Jerry Yang, New CEO Of Yahoo: Exactly What Yahoo *Doesn’t* Need?

While I am not a Yahoo! watcher by any means, the change in the guard at Yahoo! is clearly something that’s reverberating throughout the technosphere, so heck — I’ll give my unqualified $0.02 as well. You know, Terry Semel may or may not have been bad for Yahoo. Sue Decker may or may not have been a bit of a failure as it applies to Panama’s launch.

But what I do know is that Jerry Yang, the new CEO of Yahoo!, is clearly the Master of Vacuously Bland Corporate Marketingspeak.

Take this paragraph, for example, on his new vision:

What is that vision? A Yahoo! that executes with speed, clarity and discipline. A Yahoo! that increases its focus on differentiating its products and investing in creativity and innovation. A Yahoo! that better monetizes its audience. A Yahoo! whose great talent is galvanized to address its challenges. And a Yahoo! that is better focused on what’s important to its users, customers, and employees.

This has got to be the most vague, useless, and idiotic vision sentiment that I have ever had read. Its full of unspecific and uninspiring platitudes, the exact *opposite* of the what Yahoo! needs in its fight to get out of being a perennial second place finisher to Google.

I mean, its nice to think that Mr. Yang wants Yahoo to be fast, clear, disciplined, differentiated, focused and galvanized. But so what? Aren’t most companies wanting to be fast, clear, disciplined, differentiated, focused, and galvanized?

And if they weren’t *already* that way, what were they before?

Slow, vague, lazy, unfocused, and lethargic?

Come on.

Some people have said that Mr. Yang is no Steve Jobs. That’s not a fair comparison, because I think there is no one who comes even *close* to what Steve Jobs has done for Apple.

Rather, I think what everyone is actually craving for is someone who has the singular vision and will to pull Yahoo! into something that is bigger than the sum of its parts — to create something that is worthy of the its legacy as one of the first real pioneers of the Internet.

Of course, being fast, focused, galvanized and — well, all that other stuff — is important, that’s all tactical. Vision statements (or sentiments) are bigger than that. To put it into the parlance of Getting Things Done — its 50,000 feet level stuff. Its stuff that’s meant to put fire in your belly, inspire everyone to bigger and better things, and define your very reason for being.

Heck, one quick and dirty way of creating Yahoo!’s vision statment — just be the opposite of Google.

How about a web entity that is utterly devoted to being enabling the best of every human interaction on the Internet? This could encompass every aspect of its media aspirations, but could also provide a way to chart its way to social networks and web2.0 applications, from everything to Flickr to MyBlogLog, to, one day, perhaps, Facebook.

Keeping a focus on making sure that every day operations are done properly important — but at this point, Yahoo! is in dire need of someone with the guts to have a singular vision to pull all of its desperate components together into something that is bigger than any one of them apart. Someone who is at the same time both inspiring, but ruthless enough to have the cajones to make changes that are necessary.

Is Jerry Yang that kind of guy?

While I’d like to think that he is, its precisely his kind of blog post which make me think otherwise. But hey — the proof of the pudding is in the tasting, and I’m willing to give him the benefit of the doubt.

For now.

[While I consider shorting Yahoo ... ;) ]

3 Comments

  1. Posted June 19, 2007 at 1:56 am | Permalink

    Search is still where the money is. They need to build a better search mousetrap than Google – or at least create a different sort of search experience. Kind of like you’re talking about “human interaction” they could focus on human-centric search vs algorithmic search (leave that to Google and Ask).

    I think they could integrate Flickr and del.icio.us directly into search results. This could be similar to Answers integration (tacking onto existing search results) or more like Google’s universal search where Flickr/del.icio.us results are ranked with and alter the search results.

    BTW, I bet they could grab Technorati on the cheap. Hmm, a search that combines the best of Yahoo! Search + Answers, Flickr, del.icio.us and Technorati. Forget Mahalo and ChaCha. Yahoo! could be perceived as the human-powered search alternative to Google. Could it?

  2. Posted June 19, 2007 at 7:33 am | Permalink

    Richard does raise valid points. Though I was never a Yahoo! zealot, at the rate things are going, they really need to get their act together.

  3. Posted June 21, 2007 at 1:39 am | Permalink

    . . . and now they are entertaining giving up 25% of their company for Myspace. Quick math, that is a 9.1 billion dollar price tag. Somebody has got to get control of these guys, before they shoot themselves in the foot (again).

    Nice post/ no, Great post, well written.

    Peace, I’m out!

4 Trackbacks

  1. [...] Yang, New CEO Of Yahoo: Exactly What Yahoo *Doesn?t* Need?Source:Deep Jive Interests2007-06-19 [...]

  2. [...] still insists Yahoo is the last old-media company, Deep Jive Interests calls Jerry Yang the Master of Vacuously Bland Corporate Marketingspeak, and Wired doubts Yahoo will be able to pull things out vs. Google no matter what it [...]

  3. [...] can’t believe any one is excited about a vision that is predicated on such vagaries as “speed, clarity and discipline“. That’s like saying my vision is predicated upon being “awesome”, or being [...]

  4. [...] Right away, Valleywag is saying Yang is no Steve Jobs and jumping on Semel’s exit. Others are politely doubting Yang, or hinting this is just a precursor for a merger. But Yang is certainly a morale boost which is [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.

Powered by WP Hashcash