Even With Pay Per Post Ethics Irrelevant, PayPerPost Acquires Performancing.com

UPDATE: PayPerPosts’s purchase only involves the stat tracking software, and not the ad network after all. Thanks to Nick and Clickz for clearing it up.Bloggers selling out is a non issue; PayPerPost surges ahead in spite of all that

Mike Arrington has scooped things yet again with a news item that will no doubt dominate the blogosphere in some way for the next day or soPayPerPost, once the bane of ethical bloggers everywhere, has bought out Performancing.com. As a recap, Performancing.com offers a free stats package to bloggers (that I’ve never really liked; its always gotten the titles wrong on my installation), a free Firefox plugin that allows you to edit posts and start new posts directly to your blog, but most importantly, the new Performancing Ad Network.

This was launched in a beta form some months ago, and it allowed bloggers to sign up and essentially sell ad space on their blog, matching ad buyers with prospective bloggy sellers of ad space. The breakdown, for the truly interested, is around 70/30, with bloggers getting 70% of the ad revenue sold on the ad network, and 30% going back to Preformancing.

So, let’s get back to the deal. What does the deal all mean?

Well, the details are forthcoming with a press release tomorrow — but irrespective of how much PPP paid for Performancing, there are some interesting inferences one can make, and I think they all have to do with Performancing’s Ad Network.

1) PPP has purchased lots of potential bloggers for its own network: This is the most obvious, but their purchase just bought them even MORE bloggers into their fold; more potential bloggers for them to blog about their publishers, means more dollars in their own pocket, and obviously plain ol’ growth. But that might not even be the most important part — not by far.

2) PPP has acquired in-the-door relationships with many more prospective purchasers of PayPerPost “Opportunities” : The number of potential bloggers they could bring into the fold is nice, but the real news is how many publishers that they’re also now actively courting. What do I mean? Only that the demand for bloggers to be paid to blog probably far outpaces the amount of bloggable inventory. How’s that? Well, if you’re ever wondering how active their own network of bloggers is, just check out how “active” their forums are, and more importantly, how “active” the post is on “the one that got away” to give you an idea of how hungry these guys are looking for the work. PayPerPost might need bloggers — but I suspect they are probably MORE interested in publishers who have giant ad spending budgets. Performancing’s purchase doesn’t automatically get them more advertisers, but it does get them the opportunity to get more advertisers — and I suspect to Performancing, who has an eye on growth, that’s vital.

3) PPP has just acquired some (more) legitimacy through its Performancing’s own blog and bloggers: Performancing has an active blog on its own. Nick and Chris in their own right have a great blog, although in recent months it has seemed to focus on getting Performancing’s Ad network just right. i don’t know if the Performancing purchase means that Nick Wilson will be staying on to blog — but if he does, it ads instant credibility to PayPerPost. That’s not to say that things written will be all sunshine and roses, but Nick Wilson’s a smart guy, and with all of the initially negative publicity on PayPerPost, getting him and his blog on board is going to be important.

4) PPP has expanded their own offerings to allow publishers more varied offerings than merely “pay per post”: PPP focuses on selling “Opportunities” to create word of mouth advertising, which is fine and good; clearly with Performancing’s own ad network, they have the opportunity to offer much more than that. They can sell traditional ad space in an established marketplace with buyers and sellers of that ad space. Once integrated into their own system, they’ll have the opportunity to create a more full-service outfit that can offer a more diverse set of “opportunities” to bloggers and advertisers alike. They’ll need to commit capital and manpower to get it all up and working, but again, if the eye is on growth, this is nothing but a good thing.

I expect this announcement to be huge. The year has been a big one for PayPerPost, with all of the hoopla surrounding the issue of disclosure that I, myself, have blogged about once or twice. However, since their mandate to force all bloggers to disclose (albeit following an official statement by the FTC suggesting that people who do NOT disclose might face penalties), I think that PPP, along with ReviewMe and CreamAid have long since gone past the idea of whether or not pay-for-posting is ethical — because “blue-collar” bloggers have happily picked up the cause and have run with it. The idea that purity of blogging shouldn’t be sullied by paying for posts has gone from outrageous to quaint in only a matter of months.

Again, if there is any question on the popularity of this, do yourself the favour of actually monitoring the blogosphere; the vast majority of bloggers are actually talking about positive things about pay per post — mostly because it offers them cash for something many of them feel they’d do “anyway”. Many of these bloggers like being paid irrespective of how it makes them or their blog look because bloggers like money and gifts. The concept of “selling out” is a non issue. Its that simple. And fighting that basic truism, no matter how true it may be, is ultimately useless. At the end of the day, despite all that gnashing of teeth, beating on the chest, and proud proclamations of purity, it will ultimately make no diffreence at all.

And PayPerPost, ReviewMe and Creamaid are going to reap the benefits.

Yes, with advertisers now having the mechanism to manipulate what bloggers say as part of the blogospheric reality, it seems like PPP has taken the next step past the PPP debate. The purchase of Performancing.com will allow PayPerPost to bring even more legitimacy to itself by bringing some traditional advertising mechanisms, advertisers, and bloggers into the fray — both as a new way to grow itself as an advertising marketplace, AND a way to evangelize the concept of pay-per-buzz by blogging.

8 Comments

  1. Posted December 28, 2006 at 9:00 am | Permalink

    Good perspective here Tony – I don’t think that the importance of your third point can be underscored enough…

  2. Posted December 28, 2006 at 11:05 am | Permalink

    I wont be staying on Tony. We’ll be moving our ad network and blog editor to new domains and rebranding them as seperate entities.

    hope htat clarifies a bit..

  3. Posted December 28, 2006 at 1:26 pm | Permalink

    Nick, check email. :)

  4. Posted December 28, 2006 at 2:15 pm | Permalink

    I think Nick’s comment about moving the blog tool and ad network might change your analysis somewhat, Tony — although you still make a number of good points.

    I would disagree with your comment about the blog ethics debate being over, however. I don’t think it’s true that bloggers selling out is a non-issue; I think it will continue to be an issue — the current Microsoft laptop thing is an example — and how the blogosphere deals with those issues will continue to shape how people approach it.

  5. Posted December 28, 2006 at 2:58 pm | Permalink

    Mat, its over in so far as many non-A-listers will be happy to take cash to blog about anything that their patrons want. In fact, look at political bloggers, who are practically on a retainer for particular political parties.

    While my opinion on how good or bad it is hasn’t changed at all, I think that its a fairly ivory-tower type one at that. As much as people want the idea of pay per posting to die, it won’t because, much like everyone else, bloggers like getting paid for their time.

    Heck — look at the number of bloggers who signed up for ReviewMe and did one of their posts for cash. And there are a few significant ones. Where’s the outrage now?

    Everyone has their price, and as much as I could get flamed for it, I think the price that most bloggers are willing to sell their own posts and blog for is quite low.

    Cheers
    t

  6. Posted December 28, 2006 at 5:10 pm | Permalink

    Tony, I think you’re right that people want to get paid, and so they should — but to me the issue of disclosure is still important, whether for regular blogs or political ones, and I don’t think that’s an ivory tower concern at all.

  7. Posted December 28, 2006 at 5:17 pm | Permalink

    Well, I certainly agree with you on that one.
    But the “ivory tower” concern isn’t about disclosure, its the prevailing ethos that its a bad idea for marketing companies to try and pay bloggers for their opinions. As much as I find the idea distasteful, its inevitable — and as you know, its already happening.

  8. Posted January 15, 2007 at 3:05 pm | Permalink

    What if you were writing free, honest, and objective reviews in the past? What’s wrong with getting paid for your time? Is it an issue of being vested in the product you’re reviewing? Aren’t all “journalists” somewhat vested? How about if you give full disclosure?

3 Trackbacks

  1. [...] Digg it   |   Track with co.mments   |     |   Cosmos   |   Annotate this page Click here for copyright permissions! Copyright 2006 MathewIngram [...]

  2. [...] Other blogs talking about the Performancing sale: Performancing.com | TechCrunch | WinExtra | Deep Jive Interests | On Tokyo Time | The Blog Herald | ProBlogger [...]

  3. By PayPerPost to Buy Performancing? | The Last Podcast on December 29, 2006 at 10:59 am

    [...] Another Update: Looks like my sentiments are generally shared among the blogosphere: View from the Isle, ClickZ, Download Squad, John Chow dot Com, Communicontent.com, The Blogging Times, Digital Inspiration, Online Marketing Blog, Deep Jive Interests, 10e20, ALLIED, AdMoolah News and Views, Bloggers Blog, Geek News Central and ProBlogger Blog Tips [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.

Powered by WP Hashcash