Why I think the Whole Digg/ Aliwood Thing is a Big Deal

You might be wondering why I’m bothering to post a few things on this whole Aliwood/Digg thing. Well, I think its a Big Deal, and here’s why.

Digg is the posterchild of the web2.0 – and the story around it is a phenomenal one. Kevin Rose, previously only known to geeks who happen to be fans of G4TV and/or TechTV and/or one of the many incarnations has skyrocketed into the blogosphere.

With Digg, he’s pierced the consciousness of corporate America and with the absolute torrential flood of traffic Digg is getting, is highlighting the Web2.0 in a way that no one else really has. You only need to look to the frontpage of Businessweek to affirm this.

There’s been talk of Digg changing the model of the way people view and read news. “Taken out of the hands of big media and back to the People”, I’ve heard.

And if the number of Digg clones all around the world are signal of things, this opinion may be gaining traction.

For all of those reasons and more, I think it makes the Aliwood issue even more important.

If Digg is founded on the principles that it should be The People that determine what is newsworthy, then why do we have the sudden and unexpected disappearance of one of its users AND all of her posts?

The People have been playing by the rules that Digg has drawn up for themselves. And they have thought that the Aliwood issue was newsworthy — and in doing so, dugg up her stories.

To quote Yodosama, a digger:

I know I didn’t digg her annoying posts (college athletics in tech deals, give me a break). But I did have some great fun with the comments, and now I don’t get to share them with my friends, like I was really, REALLY hoping to do (if anyone knows how they could possibly be accessed, they were my first post after all… and they were dugg…). And another detail we should note, her profile is gone, too ( http://digg.com/users/AliWood/homepage )

Although the stories themselvs may have been stale, the Aliwood issue was not. Unfortunately, because of the rules that Digg have written, those stories appear to be promoted because they’re newsworthy, rather than the story around the Digger herself.

Well, if that’s NOT have Digg ought to be, then Digg ought to say so.
The sudden disappearance of Aliwood’s profile AND all of her posts is disturbing in that editorial judgement seems to have been exerted where all Diggers believe there currently exists none.

It looks like Digg plays by a different set of rules than those that currently apply to normal “Diggers”.

At the time of this writing, Digg hasn’t replied yet as to why this is going on.

I really hope to hear from them or someone who knows the case sometime soon.
Otherwise, as from the words of a fellow digger, ziggyluvsu, this looks, smell, and feels, like a coverup.

I have to disclose that I am a great fan of Kevin Rose and his gang — I hope this is not what it turns out to be.

More to come as it becomes available.

8 Comments

  1. Posted August 18, 2006 at 4:36 pm | Permalink

    Sorry, man. I submitted your story. It lasted an hour and then they killed it.

  2. Tony
    Posted August 18, 2006 at 5:10 pm | Permalink

    Its all good.

    Thanks for the interest, btw.

    Like I said before — its surprising there isn’t bigger interest in this story at all.

    I suspect we may never get a real answer from Digg — this is either below their radar, or we’re not important enough to bother writing about.

    Well, more to come as it breaks … but thanks again for the Digg. I appreciate it. ;)

    t

  3. Posted August 22, 2006 at 3:08 pm | Permalink

    You are lame. The story is lame.

  4. Tony
    Posted August 22, 2006 at 3:59 pm | Permalink

    Hey, my first troll!

    Thanks for stopping by.

    I think I’ve finally hit the big time now ;)

  5. Posted August 26, 2006 at 9:25 pm | Permalink

    I am a regular reader of Digg but certainly not a power digger. I knew nothing of this story.

    I think Digg has many problems. There does seem to be “club mentality” where the cool kids control everything. The average geek reader of Digg is going to have their eyes opened up in the near future. They are going to realize that Digg is all about money and it was from the beginning. As Seinfeld would say, “not that there is nothing wrong with that.” But the average Digg user was given the impression it was something different. Read this story currently on Digg and some of the comments: http://digg.com/tech_news/Digg_Forces_Shutdown_of_DiggGames_com_Domain/blog

    I could write much more on my feelings of Digg and maybe I will if you post again about it.

  6. Tony
    Posted August 27, 2006 at 2:20 am | Permalink

    Hey there Roy,

    Thanks for your thoughts.

    Actually I have read that latest posts — while I am no Lawyer, it seems like they’re probably within their legal rights to threaten a lawsuit against this much smaller fish.

    The worrisome thing, as a commenter has mentioned, is how the culture has changed; if Digg has a sort of geek or hacker-chic, that cachet has certainly changed, if all but disappeared.

    And it has nothing to do with the simple fact they’re going “mainstream” — but everything with the way that they’re dealing with things.

    Using the law as an instrument to bully smaller players is one way I think Digg has really changed.

    The Kevin Rose of “Dark Tips” would have never strayed down this road.

    But that’s life, I suppose — and all the more reason to catalogue the variety of controversies.

    Thanks again for your thoughts.
    If you enjoy the blog you might think of subscribing so you don’t miss a thing. ;)

    Cheeres
    t@DJI

  7. The Monkey Man
    Posted September 6, 2006 at 3:35 pm | Permalink

    Hah, great. Just what the Web 2.0 needs, another Calacanus. If it smells like a Rose….right.

  8. yodasama
    Posted September 6, 2006 at 3:37 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for that nod to my comment, I was really surprised when I came across that while reading the article :)

    I still want to know what happened… If she closed her account and took her (crappy) stories with her, why can’t the digg powers-that-be just say so? Who all here have directly asked Digg about this, and what response–if any–have you received?

    I also wonder, do you think Ali got an automatic ‘A’ for accidently causing such a stir (and exposing multiple Digg deficiencies)?

3 Trackbacks

  1. [...] I was trying to bring honest attention to the controversy over at Digg with “Aliwood” — because I think it represents something really signficant in the posterchild of the Web2.0. [...]

  2. [...] A Brief History of Digg Controversy August 25th, 2006 at 1:58 am by Tony After blogging about the “Aliwood” incident, which was received with deafening silence, I looked into whether or not this was the first time anyone had been interested in controversy over at Digg.com. [...]

  3. By Digg Controversy at diggaddict.com on September 6, 2006 at 3:25 pm

    [...] Well, its not the case. Just ask ForeverGeek. Or Aliwood. http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/08/18/why-i-think-the-whole-digg-aliwood-thing-is-a-big-deal/ http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/08/25/a-brief-history-of-digg-controversy/ [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.

Powered by WP Hashcash