<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Deep Jive Interests &#187; Web Applications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/tag/web-applications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Web 2.0, Social Media, Marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 02:51:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Will Microsoft Use Office 10 To Push Internet Explorer and Silverlight?</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2009/07/13/will-microsoft-use-office-10-to-push-internet-explorer-and-silverlight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2009/07/13/will-microsoft-use-office-10-to-push-internet-explorer-and-silverlight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 12:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Hung</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office 10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silverlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web-enabled operating system]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/?p=1570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In advance of the inevitable blogging orgy around Microsoft&#8217;s Office 10, only a couple of questions I&#8217;d like answered: Will Office 10 work &#8220;better&#8221; in Internet Explorer, and will it require Silverlight to work?  It would be fascinating (and stupid) (&#8230;)</p><p><a href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2009/07/13/will-microsoft-use-office-10-to-push-internet-explorer-and-silverlight/">Read the rest of this entry &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/13/the-complete-guide-to-microsofts-office-2010/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.techcrunch.com');" target="_blank">advance</a> of the inevitable blogging orgy around Microsoft&#8217;s Office 10, only a couple of questions I&#8217;d like answered:</p>
<p>Will Office 10 work &#8220;better&#8221; in Internet Explorer, and will it require Silverlight to work?  It would be fascinating (and stupid) if Microsoft made that the case, but I suppose, perhaps, that its no different than Google OS working &#8220;better&#8221; in Chrome (although Google&#8217;s current applications do not use a web application framework like Silverlight).</p>
<p>The other silly one is that so far all signs point to it being &#8220;free&#8221; for web-versions of Office 10 &#8212; does that mean it&#8217;s Free, ONLY if you&#8217;ve a paid version of Office 10?  Because the last time I saw a paid version of Office is probably the last time I saw a paid version of Photoshop.</p>
<p>(Work and student-bought copies being the natural exception to the rule).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2009/07/13/will-microsoft-use-office-10-to-push-internet-explorer-and-silverlight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s Chrome Could Be Crap &#8212; And It Would Still Gain Market Share</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2008/09/01/googles-chrome-could-be-crap-and-it-would-still-gain-market-share/</link>
		<comments>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2008/09/01/googles-chrome-could-be-crap-and-it-would-still-gain-market-share/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 01:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Hung</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Adams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Applications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/?p=1386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lots of interesting news about Google&#8217;s new browser, Chrome, and lots more interesting questions around it.  I love the comic by Scott Adams McCloud, being a fan of his work (mainly Understanding Comics and Making Comics ) as well, but (&#8230;)</p><p><a href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2008/09/01/googles-chrome-could-be-crap-and-it-would-still-gain-market-share/">Read the rest of this entry &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lots of interesting news about <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/09/fresh-take-on-browser.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/googleblog.blogspot.com');" target="_blank">Google&#8217;s new browser, Chrome</a>, and <a href="http://technologizer.com/2008/09/01/ten-questions-about-google-chrome/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/technologizer.com');" target="_blank">lots more interesting questions around it</a>.  <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=8UsqHohwwVYC&amp;printsec=frontcover" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/books.google.com');" target="_blank">I love the comic</a> by Scott <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">Adams</span> McCloud, being a fan of his work (mainly <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Understanding-Comics-Invisible-Scott-Mccloud/dp/006097625X" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.amazon.com');" target="_blank">Understanding Comics</a> and <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Making-Comics-Storytelling-Secrets-Graphic/dp/0060780940/ref=pd_bxgy_b_img_b" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.amazon.com');" target="_blank">Making Comics</a> ) as well, but that&#8217;s beside the point.  The most surprising news, for me, is that its not being released at some unknown period in the future, but tomorrow.  As in two hours from now.  For news this big, its kind of amazing we haven&#8217;t heard anything trickle out except for unsubstantiated rumours.  That&#8217;s awesome.</p>
<p>The other thing that struck me is that Chrome could be crap &#8212; and it probably won&#8217;t, but it could be &#8212; and yet, the penetration of this product could be *huge*.  Google owns almost 70% of the total search in North America.  70%!  Even if no one else wrote about it, there was no blogger buzz, and no coverage that we all expect in tomorrow&#8217;s news &#8230; all it has to do is throw up some strategic links on its SERP&#8217;s, on its home page, and on all of its applications (since Chrome will exist for web applications it would be especially apropros), and this will still get thousands and thousands of downloads on the strength of Google&#8217;s web presence alone.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s not even taking into the consideration some people think of <a href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2008/07/17/the-mainstream-deception-is-googles-achilles-heel/"  target="_blank">Google as the Internet itself.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2008/09/01/googles-chrome-could-be-crap-and-it-would-still-gain-market-share/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

