<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Deep Jive Interests &#187; frustration free packging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/tag/frustration-free-packging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Web 2.0, Social Media, Marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:37:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Could Anyone BUT Amazon Do &#8220;Frustration Free&#8221; Packaging?</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2008/11/03/could-anyone-but-amazon-do-frustration-free-packaging/</link>
		<comments>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2008/11/03/could-anyone-but-amazon-do-frustration-free-packaging/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 01:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Hung</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bullet proof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frustration free packging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[packaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plastic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/?p=1441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may have heard that Amazon has decided to some pretty amazing stuff with &#8220;Frustration Free&#8221; packaging with its 19 most popular items, moving away from plastic clamshells that might was as well be bullet proof.  I have ranted on this before, and I think its fantastic that Amazon has gone &#8212; and is continuing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may have heard that <a href="http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=176060&amp;p=irol-newsArticle&amp;ID=1220930&amp;highlight=" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/phx.corporate-ir.net');" target="_blank">Amazon has decided to some pretty amazing stuff with &#8220;Frustration Free&#8221; packaging</a> with its 19 most popular items, moving away from plastic clamshells that might was as well be bullet proof.  <a href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/08/12/bullet-proof-plastic-wrapping-health-hazard-or-theft-prevention-device/"  target="_blank">I have ranted on this before</a>, and I think its fantastic that Amazon has gone &#8212; and is continuing &#8212; to go to lengths to find a solution to this problem: by going directly to manufacturers to help repackage these items that make sense.</p>
<p>Why hasn&#8217;t anyone else done this?  Probably because Amazon is the only one who could.</p>
<p>Consider that bulletproof plastic clamshells exist for (the perhaps erroneous) reason of deterring retail theft, and you&#8217;ll realize that Amazon probably went to these manufacturers and said &#8220;hey &#8212; there&#8217;s no threat of that <strong>when you order online</strong>.&#8221;</p>
<p>Couple that with the thought that Amazon is probably the only<strong> 900 lb online gorrilla</strong> that has the clout to do this sort of thing first &#8212; and the fact that most manufacturers and packagers will be happy to grab the halo effect of seeming more environmentally friendly, and it looks like a slam dunk.</p>
<p>In fact, if its a success, one wonders how fast the rest of the online e-tailing industry will follow suit.  If and when it&#8217;ll ever impact retail packaging &#8230; well, one can only hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2008/11/03/could-anyone-but-amazon-do-frustration-free-packaging/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
