<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Deep Jive Interests &#187; Bing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/tag/bing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Web 2.0, Social Media, Marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 02:51:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>WolframAlpha, Where Are You?</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2009/07/13/wolframalpha-where-are-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2009/07/13/wolframalpha-where-are-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 01:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Hung</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wolfram Alpha]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/?p=1572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Time will tell if it was Bing&#8217;s inherent abilities or Microsoft&#8217;s deep-pockets spending that caused the initial bump of 8% in unique users after the first month &#8212; but its clear what is suffering from a lack of Buzz &#8230; Wolfram Alpha. (&#8230;)</p><p><a href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2009/07/13/wolframalpha-where-are-you/">Read the rest of this entry &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time will tell if it was Bing&#8217;s inherent abilities or Microsoft&#8217;s deep-pockets spending that <a href="http://www.bing.com/community/blogs/search/archive/2009/07/13/bing-at-month-one.aspx" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.bing.com');" target="_blank">caused the initial bump of 8%</a> in unique users after the first month &#8212; but its clear what is suffering from a lack of Buzz &#8230; Wolfram Alpha.</p>
<p>About two months after its initial launch, there&#8217;s been thundering silence from the blogosphere / socialstream on WolframAlpha&#8217;s computational awesomeness.  And now,<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10285645-2.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news&amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-20" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/news.cnet.com');" target="_blank"> even with some buzzworthy stuff</a>, it seems like its wholly underwhelming [not being a stats nut, I will take WebWare's take on VORPs for example].</p>
<p>While WolframAlpha was never meant to in any way replace Google, its got to be a little disappointing to see a <a href="http://www.blogpulse.com/trend?query1=wolframalpha.com&amp;operator=" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.blogpulse.com');" target="_blank">50% drop off in traffic</a> and an <a style="text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.blogpulse.com/trend?query1=wolframalpha.com&amp;operator=" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.blogpulse.com');" target="_blank">almost complete drop off in buzz</a>.</p>
<p>With its growing community, some pretty fantastic stuff with its development in frameworks, astronomy, and other eggheadedness awesomeness, I&#8217;m not sure if the problem is a piece of software which is inherently lackluster &#8212; Cuil, I&#8217;m looking at you.</p>
<p>Maybe buzz isn&#8217;t important.  Maybe traffic isn&#8217;t important.  But, I suspect that for WolframAlpha&#8217;s investors, and as a means to ultimately monetize things, both metrics probably *are*important to some degree.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s hoping that the WolframAlpha team continues to improve its marketing outreach.  Its not that Google needs more competitors, because WolframAlpha really isn&#8217;t about Google &#8212; its about developing a unique piece of computational answer-ware which deserves to live and thrive in its own right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2009/07/13/wolframalpha-where-are-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Many Geeks Are Even Trying Bing?</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2009/06/14/how-many-geeks-are-even-trying-bing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2009/06/14/how-many-geeks-are-even-trying-bing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 21:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Hung</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geeks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google fanboy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/?p=1487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think one of the great advantages that Google has isn&#8217;t just the strength of its search technology, or the bottom-line deliciousness of adwords / adsense.  Its really the thought leadership of what &#8220;Search&#8221; &#8212; and even, probably &#8220;The Internet&#8221; (&#8230;)</p><p><a href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2009/06/14/how-many-geeks-are-even-trying-bing/">Read the rest of this entry &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think one of the great advantages that Google has isn&#8217;t just the strength of its search technology, or the bottom-line deliciousness of adwords / adsense.  Its really the thought leadership of what &#8220;Search&#8221; &#8212; and even, probably &#8220;The Internet&#8221; &#8212; means to so many ordinary people.</p>
<p>So much so, (and moreso than say, &#8220;Internet Explorer&#8221; ever meant to browsers, or Windows ever meant to PCs) that I wonder how many folks are actually going to give Bing a try.  Notwithstanding the opinions of reputable technology publications like the <a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/06142009/business/fear_grips_google_174235.htm" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.nypost.com');" target="_blank">New York Daily Post</a>, how much of an uphill climb is Bing&#8217;s marketing approach going to be when you&#8217;re trying to penetrate some fairly hardened assumptions?  <a href="http://bobcaswell.com/2009/06/14/its-official-i-now-use-bing-instead-of-google/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/bobcaswell.com');" target="_blank">And what about Geeks</a>?</p>
<p>Personally some part of it for me is the simple disdain that Microsoft != &#8220;cool&#8221; (Xbox and its intellectual properties excluded, naturally), and that Microsoft could never really touch the sainted toe lint of Google.  And if that isn&#8217;t a touch of Google fanboy-ism I dont&#8217; know what is.</p>
<p>Maybe that&#8217;s true.  It probably isn&#8217;t.  To that end, I&#8217;m going to try and make Bing my default search tool for a couple weeks to try it out.  Who knows?  The last time I tried making anything my default [whatever] I ended up switching out of Firefox right into Chrome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2009/06/14/how-many-geeks-are-even-trying-bing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

