<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Deep Jive Interests &#187; Wordpress 2.3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/category/wordpress-23/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Web 2.0, Social Media, Marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 02:51:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google vs. Technorati: Who Wins In Inbound Links?</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/10/google-vs-technorati-who-wins-in-inbound-links/</link>
		<comments>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/10/google-vs-technorati-who-wins-in-inbound-links/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 05:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Hung</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technorati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wordpress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wordpress 2.3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/10/google-vs-technorati-who-wins-in-inbound-links/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, if you&#8217;re like me and have updated to WordPress 2.3, you may have also noted that on the WordPress dashboard, the &#8220;inbound links&#8221; list is now being populated by Google&#8217;s Blogsearch and not Technorati. There&#8217;s been some talk about (&#8230;)</p><p><a href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/10/google-vs-technorati-who-wins-in-inbound-links/">Read the rest of this entry &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/youmightbesurprised.jpg" alt="Google vs. Technorati — You might be surprised" /></p>
<p>So, if you&#8217;re like me and have updated to WordPress 2.3, you may have also noted that on the WordPress dashboard, the &#8220;inbound links&#8221; list is now being populated by Google&#8217;s Blogsearch and not Technorati.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s been some talk about how relevant Technorati has been (including a <a href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/06/technorati-dumps-on-small-minded-bloggers-yours-truly-included/"  target="_blank">particularly shrill post by yours truly</a>), and perhaps because it *hasn&#8217;t* been, getting Google to index inbound links, therefore, is a Good Thing.</p>
<p>But is it?</p>
<p>Is Google&#8217;s Blogsearch <strong>*good* at finding those inbound Blog links? </strong></p>
<p>Now, a quick look by myself shows that for Deep Jive Interests, <strong>the answer is resounding &#8220;HELL NO.&#8221;</strong>  The last time Google shows any inbound link <a href="http://blogsearch.google.com/blogsearch?hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=link%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.deepjiveinterests.com%2F&amp;btnG=Search+Blogs" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/blogsearch.google.com');" target="_blank">is October 30th</a>, but in fact I have inbound links all the way until yesterday.  In fact, Technorati is able to find <a href="http://www.technorati.com/blogs/deepjiveinterests.com?reactions" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.technorati.com');" target="_blank">blogs that have linked to me within the minute those posts</a> (that have those links) are published.  Google looks like its about a week behind.<br />
Now the caveat here is that I am still waiting for my blog to get re-indexed by Google <a href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/07/i-was-hacked/"  target="_blank">after I was hacked</a>.  So, maybe *that*&#8217;s the reason why Google doesn&#8217;t look so good, right?</p>
<p>Well, I had a few cursory looks at a few of my other<a href="http://blogsearch.google.com/blogsearch?hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=link%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork&amp;btnG=Search+Blogs" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/blogsearch.google.com');" target="_blank"> favourite blogs</a>, and the same sort of <a href="http://www.technorati.com/blogs/mathewingram.com%2Fwork?reactions" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.technorati.com');" target="_blank">pattern emerges</a>.  Technorati is able to find the &#8220;reactions&#8221; within minutes of those inbound links actually being published.</p>
<p>Google? <strong> It has trouble.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Now, I don&#8217;t know the actual &#8220;why&#8217;s&#8221; for this happening</strong>; perhaps its because everyone and their sister who has a blog registers it formally *with* Technorati so they can follow their own Authority ranking and so on.  And furthermore, because by Default, WordPress pings Pingo-matic, which by default usually pings Technorati.</p>
<p>On the other hand, I&#8217;ve read that <a href="http://ewebscapes.com/blog-visibility-google-ping-service/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/ewebscapes.com');" target="_blank">Google also monitors Pingo-matic</a>, and should therefore also update whenever Pingo-matic updates.  If that&#8217;s the case, then, I don&#8217;t know &#8212; perhaps actually registering your site (and pinging) with Technorati makes it easier to work these kinds of relationships out and in a much quicker fashion.</p>
<p><strong>In any case, I suggest you try and figure this out for yourself.</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>1. Go to Google&#8217;s BlogSearch at <a href="http://blogsearch.google.com" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/blogsearch.google.com');" target="_blank">http://blogsearch.google.com/</a></p>
<p>2. For the search term, enter &#8220;link:URL_OF_YOUR_BLOG&#8221; &#8211;&gt; and of course replace the URL of your blog as necessary.</p>
<p>3. Note the results which are sorted by default according to date.  Marvel at how dated some of these results are.</p>
<p>4. Then, go to Technorati at <a href="http://www.technorati.com" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.technorati.com');" target="_blank">http://www.technorati.com</a> (naturally)</p>
<p>5. Enter your own blog URL again, and note the number of reactions.  Marvel at how fresh these results are.</p></blockquote>
<p>If you find that I&#8217;m totally off my rocker, let me know.  However, in the few blogs that I&#8217;ve checked I&#8217;ve come up with similar results.  Maybe I *will* install <a href="http://www.nusuni.com/blog/nusuni-technorati-links-wordpress-plugin/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.nusuni.com');" target="_blank">this plugin now</a>. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/10/google-vs-technorati-who-wins-in-inbound-links/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

