<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Deep Jive Interests &#187; WebbAlert</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/category/webbalert/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Web 2.0, Social Media, Marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 02:51:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is There Another Federated Media &#8220;Conversation&#8221; Conspiracy?</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/08/02/is-there-another-federated-media-conversation-conspiracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/08/02/is-there-another-federated-media-conversation-conspiracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 01:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Hung</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Allen Stern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Center Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federated Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morgan Webb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebbAlert]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/08/02/is-there-another-federated-media-conversation-conspiracy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, this is the third posting in a day on Morgan Webb&#8217;s WebbAlert, I know, but in Allen Stern of CenterNetworks queries whether there is an FM (Federated Media) Conspiracy regarding WebbAlert.  After all, its FM sells space on WebbAlert.  (&#8230;)</p><p><a href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/08/02/is-there-another-federated-media-conversation-conspiracy/">Read the rest of this entry &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, this is the <a href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/08/02/webbalert-morgan-webb-reads-techmeme/"  target="_blank">third posting</a> <a href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/08/02/one-more-thing-about-webbalert/"  target="_blank">in a day</a> on Morgan Webb&#8217;s WebbAlert, I know, but in Allen Stern of CenterNetworks queries <a href="http://www.centernetworks.com/is-this-federated-medias-new-conversation" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.centernetworks.com');" target="_blank">whether there is an FM (Federated Media) Conspiracy regarding WebbAlert</a>.  After all, its FM sells space on WebbAlert.  And  many of the reviews of WebbAlert done by the other FM blogs are actually positive of WebbAlert.</p>
<p>In the context of past FM <a href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/06/23/understanding-the-real-nature-of-conversational-marketing-its-more-insidious-than-payperpost/"  target="_blank">&#8216;conversational marketing&#8217; shennanigans</a>, does this constitute another form of subtle conversational marketing?  Marketing done on the sly?  Has John Batelle quietly asked &#8212; velvet fist-styles &#8212; his FM authors to skew their posts to favourably influence traffic and opinion towards another FM authored blog?</p>
<p>Maybe.</p>
<p>(God knows I love a good conspiracy).</p>
<p>The problem is that most of the reviews are generally warranted.  I think this is a good move on Webb&#8217;s part.  She does the part well.  She has fan-boy cred.  Its not half bad.  And its still way, way, way too early to really judge how this thing is going to go.</p>
<p>Now, if WebbAlert sucked raw donkey sphincter, that&#8217;d be a completely different story.  But because things have yet to pan out, I&#8217;ll agree with Allen on this one.  I mean, the picture of FM blogs pimping one another seems laughable on the surface, but I suppose stranger things have happened in the blogosphere.  And the conversation is one that deserves watching carefully, if for no other reason that the issue of a potential conflicts of interest is always a worthy one &#8212; and does come up here, since the common denominator is the company which is funneling payments to everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/08/02/is-there-another-federated-media-conversation-conspiracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

