<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Deep Jive Interests &#187; readwriteweb</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/category/readwriteweb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Web 2.0, Social Media, Marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 02:51:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The &#8220;Mainstream&#8221; Deception Is Google&#8217;s Achille&#8217;s Heel</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2008/07/17/the-mainstream-deception-is-googles-achilles-heel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2008/07/17/the-mainstream-deception-is-googles-achilles-heel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 20:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Hung</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marshall kirpatrick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[readwriteweb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[early adopters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/?p=1341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marshall Kirkpatrick comments on a recent Hitwise study, remarking that a whole load of people *still* type in the URL not in the Address Bar, but directly into a search engine, to find their site.  Marshall&#8217;s wondering if civilization as (&#8230;)</p><p><a href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2008/07/17/the-mainstream-deception-is-googles-achilles-heel/">Read the rest of this entry &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marshall Kirkpatrick comments on a recent Hitwise study,<a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_mainstream_users_ever_learn.php" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.readwriteweb.com');" target="_blank"> remarking that a whole load of people *still* type in the URL not in the Address Bar,</a> but directly into a search engine, to find their site.  Marshall&#8217;s wondering if civilization as we know it would collapse around our ears if some elements of the web going community were to grow a few IQ points (that&#8217;s how I parsed it, anyway).</p>
<p>Personally, I think it confirms what I&#8217;ve always believed &#8212; that there is a <strong>wide, WIIIIDE gulf between &#8220;average&#8221; users of the web</strong> (and I grossly assume people using dating sites, as the example used by Marshall, are average) and the above average power user / keen early <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">adopters</span> devourers (read: geekasaurus maximus and proud of it) of new media. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure that the split occurs along some generational lines, some attitudinal lines, and other psycho-social demographics &#8212; I&#8217;m not going to rant about what they *are*, because I&#8217;m not sure they&#8217;re as important as recognizing that the split will likely always exist in some form or another.</p>
<p><strong>Why is that?</strong>  You might think that given the graphical web as we know it is probably more than 10 years old (probably pushing 15), there&#8217;s been a lot of time for people to get used to certain conventions.  And I&#8217;d certainly think &#8212; if you were being a little age-ist &#8212; that it even applies to people of a younger age, as, on the whole, its probably less likely that the geriatric amongst us are frequenting such dating sites (and thus making the &#8220;mistake&#8221; of &#8220;searching&#8221; for the URL of a site).</p>
<p>Yes, I think that the biggest piece of evidence the gulf exists &#8212; and will likely always exist &#8212; is in web advertising, particularly the direct-advertising variety, namely, <strong>and specifically, Google Adwords</strong>.</p>
<p>Google&#8217;s life blood, I think, is built upon the <strong>naivite of thousands of thousands</strong> of people clicking on ads that they don&#8217;t realize are *not* really ads.  I think if this deception were somehow magically lifted, there would be a whole lot FEWER people clicking on those benignly blue underlined links (even though its clearly noted as &#8220;sponsored&#8221; or &#8216;advertisements&#8217;), and quite a bit fewer people wandering into giant spam blog networks and other (but not necessarily) spammy and / or overly commercial and unhelpful areas of the web.</p>
<p>So would the whole world collapse on itself if mainstream users ever learn to the address bar?  Not quite &#8212; but as a surrogate for the behaviour of a dramatically large percentage of web users world wide, it might, for example, mean the end of &lt;gasp&gt; direct advertising on the web &#8230; and perhaps, therefore, Google itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2008/07/17/the-mainstream-deception-is-googles-achilles-heel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

