<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Deep Jive Interests &#187; Lifestreaming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/category/lifestreaming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Web 2.0, Social Media, Marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 02:51:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Teens Not Twittering? Absolutely.  Here&#8217;s the Evidence.</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2009/07/13/teens-not-twittering-absolutely-heres-the-evidence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2009/07/13/teens-not-twittering-absolutely-heres-the-evidence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 02:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Hung</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lifestreaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Parr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caroline McCarthy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[participatory media network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teens on Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/?p=1577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, I didn&#8217;t conduct the research myself, but as astutely pointed out by Ben Parr, the recent report commissioned by Morgan Stanley regarding one teen (and his friend&#8217;s) internet / technology related activities may seem the sweeping generalizations of a (&#8230;)</p><p><a href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2009/07/13/teens-not-twittering-absolutely-heres-the-evidence/">Read the rest of this entry &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I didn&#8217;t conduct<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=aG2UIb23pNQ0" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.bloomberg.com');" target="_blank"> the research </a>myself, but as <a href="http://mashable.com/2009/07/13/twitter-teenager-morgan/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/mashable.com');" target="_blank">astutely pointed out by Ben Parr</a>, the recent report commissioned by Morgan Stanley regarding one teen (and his friend&#8217;s) internet / technology related activities may seem the sweeping generalizations of a small group of individuals &#8230; but they do have some roots in evidence.</p>
<p>Well, that bit about teens not twittering anyway.  Earlier last month, Caroline McCarthy pointed out an <a href="http://thepmn.org/Default.aspx?PageID=2537256&amp;A=SearchResult&amp;SearchID=298262&amp;ObjectID=2537256&amp;ObjectType=1" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/thepmn.org');" target="_blank">interesting study from Pace University and the Participatory Media Network</a>.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s kind of interesting that isn&#8217;t mentioned in the original CNet article, is that the survey is made of 200 individuals who were members and consumers from the Participatory Media Network.  I take this to mean that these are individuals who already have a bias to be tech-friendly and social-media minded.</p>
<p>And yet, out of those 200 individuals aged 19-24, only 22% of them were on Twitter.</p>
<p>However, in keeping with the Morgan Stanley report, which talks about teens being on social networks, 99% of those surveyed were also on social networks.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m sure this is all just the tip of the iceberg (<a href="http://arstechnica.com/web/news/2009/02/study-twitter-users-are-mobile-urban-and-engaged-online.ars" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/arstechnica.com');" target="_blank">in a Pew poll conducted last year, only 19% of teens / young adults were on Twitter</a>).  In my anecdotal and non-scientific polling of friends and family this is entirely consistent.  Most teens and young adults I know aren&#8217;t on Twitter, and if they have heard of it, just don&#8217;t &#8220;get&#8221; it to any degree.</p>
<p>Even as Twitter continues to explode, one wonders how sustainable it is, if it doesn&#8217;t have the power of demographics on its side.  Or, perhaps, if it will, perhaps like Facebook, inevitably skew to an older individuals over time, <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/13/why-teens-arent-using-twitter/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.techcrunch.com');" target="_blank">safety issues or no</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2009/07/13/teens-not-twittering-absolutely-heres-the-evidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Happened With Pownce?</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2008/07/25/what-happened-with-pownce/</link>
		<comments>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2008/07/25/what-happened-with-pownce/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 02:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Hung</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lifestreaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Micro-messaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pownce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leah Culver]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/?p=1373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[*image via Quantcast Almost 8 months into its public launch, Pownce is looking like a bit of a lame duck. Which is strange (or not). On paper, Pownce seems like a better Twitter than Twitter, given that you can also (&#8230;)</p><p><a href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2008/07/25/what-happened-with-pownce/">Read the rest of this entry &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone" src="http://www.quantcast.com/livegraph.png?gt=mwg&amp;dty=pp&amp;dtr=dd&amp;wunit=wd:com.pownce|0%20wd:com.twitter|1&amp;c=1" alt="" width="500" height="330" /><br />
<em>*image via Quantcast</em></p>
<p>Almost 8 months into its public launch, <a href="http://www.pownce.com" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.pownce.com');" target="_blank">Pownce</a> is looking like a <strong>bit of a lame duck. </strong></p>
<p><strong>Which is strange (or not).</strong></p>
<p>On paper, <strong>Pownce seems like a better Twitter than Twitter</strong>, given that you can also share files (up to 100 MB in size), as well as embed photos, videos, or MP3&#8242;s.  Plus, it handles sharing links in a sleeker way, more dedicated way.  Oh, the mobile interface is kind of nice as well, and when compared against Twitter&#8217;s native mobile interface, it doth rocketh a teensiest harder.</p>
<p>What else does it have going for it?  How about a tight pedigree, with Kevin &#8220;I&#8217;ll Still Be A Dark Tipper After <a href="http://www.techmeme.com/080722/p124#a080722p124" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.techmeme.com');" target="_blank">$200M</a>, I swear!&#8221; Rose&#8217;s mark behind it.</p>
<p>So, why hasn&#8217;t it gotten the traction that Twitter has?  It&#8217;s been out of private beta since January, but according to public traffic estimates across the board, things have remained kind of flat.  In fact, even with Twitter&#8217;s outages, dropping of Twitter followers, and public cries of &#8220;I swear, THIS time, I&#8217;m dropping it!&#8221;, Pownce &#8212; or, other micro-messaging services &#8212; really haven&#8217;t seemed to make a dent into Twitter.</p>
<p><strong>My best guess(es):</strong> a combination of first mover advantage plus network effects.  Business history is littered with the examples of lesser products hauling marketing share over products that seem brilliant and better; in this case, Twitter *defined* what micro-messaging services was, captured the imagination of early adopters, exploded at SXSW 2007, and remained challengerless while those early adopters &#8220;figured&#8221; out how Twitter was useful (Twitter not as a life-streaming service per se, but more of a stateless hive mind, where you can have one-to-many interactions seemlessly).</p>
<p>And by the time they *did*, it was really too late, because far too many people were on Twitter to begin with.  Changing services would be monumental, and convincing others to use it would be a colossal pain in the ass.</p>
<p><strong>Merely *being* better, as in Pownce&#8217;s case, can&#8217;t be enough.</strong></p>
<p>And having that built in audience is just as surely saving Twitter&#8217;s bacon time, after time, after time.</p>
<p>How could services like Pownce (and Plurk, for that matter), grow their audiences?  Its hard to know.  There&#8217;s really only one Web 2.0 company that seems to be thriving, in spite of having features that seem to follow the leader: Mixx.</p>
<p>Mixx will never out-digg Digg, but because of industry connections, they&#8217;ve been able to convince mainstream media outlets to put their little &#8220;Mixx&#8221; it button on their sites, creating the impression, anyway, that they&#8217;re on equal footing with Digg (and Propeller, for that matter).</p>
<p>Bottom line?<br />
<img src="http://www.quantcast.com/livegraph.png?gt=mwg&amp;dty=pp&amp;dtr=dd&amp;wunit=wd:com.mixx|0%20wd:com.pownce|1&amp;c=1" alt="" width="450" height="300" /></p>
<p>An upward ticking graph that makes everyone happy.  Sure, <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/mixx_still_tiny.php" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.readwriteweb.com');" target="_blank">you&#8217;d think</a> the traffic would go through the roof with inbound traffic from the New York Times, CNN and USA Today, but at least its up.</p>
<p>Unlike Pownce.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2008/07/25/what-happened-with-pownce/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

