<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Deep Jive Interests &#187; Jaiku</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/category/jaiku/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Web 2.0, Social Media, Marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 02:51:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Leo Laporte Quietly Abandons Jaiku, Comes Back To Twitter.</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/11/leo-laporte-quietly-abandons-jaiku-comes-back-to-twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/11/leo-laporte-quietly-abandons-jaiku-comes-back-to-twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 07:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Hung</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jaiku]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leo Laporte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/11/leo-laporte-quietly-abandons-jaiku-comes-back-to-twitter/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Update @ 11/12/07 ~ 1200h: Looks like Leo gives 10 reason why he&#8217;s back.  Nothing so far about his concerns about TWiT / Twitter confusion. When Leo Laporte leapt from Twitter to Jaiku earlier this year, the blogosphere was in (&#8230;)</p><p><a href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/11/leo-laporte-quietly-abandons-jaiku-comes-back-to-twitter/">Read the rest of this entry &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><strong>Update @ 11/12/07 ~ 1200h: </strong>Looks like <a href="http://leoville.com/blog/2007/11/12/1144/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/leoville.com');" target="_blank">Leo gives 10 reason why he&#8217;s back</a>.  Nothing so far about his concerns about TWiT / Twitter confusion.</em></p>
<p>When Leo Laporte <a href="http://leoville.vox.com/library/post/goodbye-twitter-hello-jaiku.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/leoville.vox.com');" target="_blank">leapt from Twitter to Jaiku earlier this year</a>, the blogosphere was in a bit of an uproar.  I was.  Sort of.  And the reason was because Leo didn&#8217;t want people confusing the service, Twitter, with his podcast, TWiT.</p>
<p>At the time I <a href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/04/07/why-is-leo-laporte-acting-like-a-petulant-child/"  target="_blank">wondered why Leo just didn&#8217;t sicc some high-powered lawyers</a> on the gents at Twitter; generally that seems to be the established thing to do when it comes to protecting your trademark / copyright (although I am no lawyer), as my understanding is that if you don&#8217;t defend it you can lose it.</p>
<p>By abandoning Twitter for Jaiku for this reason &#8212; well, it just seemed ineffective and childish.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, it seems like Leo has come *back* to Twitter today at <a href="http://twitter.com/leolaporte" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/twitter.com');" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/leolaporte</a>, raising the white flag with &#8220;<a href="http://twitter.com/leolaporte/statuses/399724442" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/twitter.com');" target="_blank">I surrender, Twitter.  You win</a>&#8220;.</p>
<p>(Incidentally, <a href="http://leoville.com/blog/2007/09/10/977/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/leoville.com');" target="_blank">he&#8217;s also dropped SixApart&#8217;s Vox for WordPress</a> for his blogging platform of choice, although that happened almost two months ago).</p>
<p>At any rate, there&#8217;s no apparent reason why he&#8217;s come back to Twitter, and there&#8217;s no further updates as to his thoughts about people confusing the two terms.  Did it have anything to do with his thoughts about Jaiku?  That because its in closed beta he <a href="http://chieftwit.jaiku.com/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/chieftwit.jaiku.com');" target="_blank">only had 76 people following his Jaiku feed?</a> (compared to the 1200+ followers within hours of announcing that he&#8217;s back on Twitter?)  Or perhaps he&#8217;s merely come to his senses about the non-issue of people confusing Twitter with his podcast.</p>
<p>Or, maybe its a little of all of the above.</p>
<p>Given the <a href="http://www.google.ca/search?q=leo+laporte+twitter+copyright&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;aq=t&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.google.ca');" target="_blank">amount of consternation earlier this year</a>, I wonder if anyone else has taken notice &#8212; and furthermore, if Leo&#8217;s going to let us in on why he&#8217;s come back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/11/leo-laporte-quietly-abandons-jaiku-comes-back-to-twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8230; But Is The World Ready For Mobile Lifestreaming? (Or Microblogging? Or Presence Management?)</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/10/09/but-is-the-world-ready-for-mobile-lifestreaming-or-microblogging-or-presence-management/</link>
		<comments>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/10/09/but-is-the-world-ready-for-mobile-lifestreaming-or-microblogging-or-presence-management/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 02:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Hung</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jaiku]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/10/09/but-is-the-world-ready-for-mobile-lifestreaming-or-microblogging-or-presence-management/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So it looks like Google bought the &#8216;other&#8217; ambient broadcasting / lifestreaming / presence management / microblogging tool, Jaiku today. Mind, like Mat Ingram, I haven&#8217;t actually tried Jaiku, but from all accounts it has a great many similarities to (&#8230;)</p><p><a href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/10/09/but-is-the-world-ready-for-mobile-lifestreaming-or-microblogging-or-presence-management/">Read the rest of this entry &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it looks like <a href="http://www.jaiku.com/blog/2007/10/09/were-joining-google/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.jaiku.com');" target="_blank">Google bought</a> the &#8216;other&#8217; ambient broadcasting / lifestreaming / presence management / microblogging tool, Jaiku today.  Mind, <a href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/10/09/google-why-jaiku-and-not-twitter/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.mathewingram.com');" target="_blank">like Mat Ingram</a>, I haven&#8217;t actually tried Jaiku, but from <a href="http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/06/leo-laporte-leaves-twitter-for-jaiku/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/scobleizer.com');" target="_blank">all accounts it has a great many similarities to Twitter</a>, although up until now, a fraction of the buzz (and possibly userbase as well, if some imperfect measures are made).</p>
<p>The funny thing is that while I haven&#8217;t tried Jaiku, I *have* tried Twitter, and while I *get* that some people love it, I&#8217;d have to say that it must still be way, way, way up the early adoption curve.  I mean, I&#8217;d like to think that I&#8217;m somewhat early-adopterish myself, but even I don&#8217;t really *get* it in the way that I use it regularly &#8212; or any other tool, really, from Facebook&#8217;s &#8220;status&#8221;, to Pownce.</p>
<p>Now, that may have to do with the fact that I don&#8217;t have &#8220;friends&#8221; who I know might be interested in what I am doing at any given time, or merely, perhaps that I have crossed the &#8220;old&#8221; dog divide some time ago and never even realized it (not being able to learn new tricks and all of that).</p>
<p><strong>But in a regular moment of hubris I&#8217;m going to go out on a limb </strong>and say &#8212; that in the absence of any real data (<a href="http://blogs.forrester.com/charleneli/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/blogs.forrester.com');" target="_blank">Charlene Li, where are you?</a>) &#8212; that if this kind of service is something that is *so* early adopter, that I wonder if the rest of the world &#8230; who Google is really aiming at, in spite of its Geekish roots &#8230; is really ready for this.</p>
<p>Do I have any particular reasons for this?  Only that to start using this kind of service requires you to have a fundamentally different relationship with your social network than most people have right now.</p>
<p>They have to be prepared &#8212; and actually want to, of course &#8212; report on what they&#8217;re doing, regularly, during the course of the day, before work, during work, and after work.  Presuming that they might work.  Substitute &#8220;work&#8221; for &#8220;school&#8221; if you want.</p>
<p>And furthermore, they have to know that their messages are going to be reciprocated in some way.  So, its not a behaviour that&#8217;s occurring in isolation; rather, there has to be at least one, but probably more &#8220;friends&#8221; that are equally as active.</p>
<p>Now, its one thing for <a href="http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/09/google-making-big-social-media-moves/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/scobleizer.com');" target="_blank">Scoble to jump in with both feet</a> (or, <a href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/04/07/why-is-leo-laporte-acting-like-a-petulant-child/"  target="_blank">Leo Laporte, for that matter</a>) &#8212; and its another to have that brother of yours who doesn&#8217;t know how to use &#8220;blog&#8221; in a sentence without giggling, or that niece of yours who is happy to text with her friends, but might not be interested in a new activity until her friends are.</p>
<p>Now, Google has all the money in the world to invest in these relatively small bets (because you can bet that Jaiku&#8217;s a smaller bet than, say, Twitter), and maybe that&#8217;s all this is.  Dodgeball was way ahead of its time, and Google has a track record of what it does (and doesn&#8217;t do) with some of its acquisitions.</p>
<p>But if Google fast tracks Jaiku, will the world be ready for it?</p>
<p>You know what?  I&#8217;m not so sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/10/09/but-is-the-world-ready-for-mobile-lifestreaming-or-microblogging-or-presence-management/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

