<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Deep Jive Interests &#187; insulting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/category/insulting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Web 2.0, Social Media, Marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 02:51:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Technorati Dumps On Small Minded Bloggers (Yours Truly Included)</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/06/technorati-dumps-on-small-minded-bloggers-yours-truly-included/</link>
		<comments>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/06/technorati-dumps-on-small-minded-bloggers-yours-truly-included/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 06:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Hung</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technorati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insulting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irrelevance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/06/technorati-dumps-on-small-minded-bloggers-yours-truly-included/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw small minded, because only small minded people would care about their Technorati ranking, and only the small minded would care if Technorati were indexing older, and clearly &#60;dripping with sarcasm&#62; irrelevant &#60;/still dripping with sarcasm&#62; posts that took (&#8230;)</p><p><a href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/06/technorati-dumps-on-small-minded-bloggers-yours-truly-included/">Read the rest of this entry &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/kiss-my-ass.jpg" alt="Homer Can Tell Technorati What To Do" align="right" />I saw small minded, because only small minded people would care about their Technorati ranking, and only the small minded would care if Technorati were indexing older, and clearly <strong>&lt;dripping with sarcasm&gt; irrelevant &lt;/still dripping with sarcasm&gt;</strong> posts that took time to write, think about and otherwise put together.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll admit that I am small minded, and and am thus am more than a little outraged that Technorati has decided to drop &#8212; until further notice, or it is otherwise economically feasible &#8212; <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.techcrunch.com');" target="_blank">posts that are more than 6 months old</a>.</p>
<p>Yes, there are the arguments that Technorati is irrelevant, so &#8220;who cares&#8221;; there is also the assertion that Technorati is trying to move away from archiving and indexing blogs in favour of other &#8220;new media&#8221;, because that&#8217;s what is &#8220;cool&#8221;, &#8220;hip&#8221;, and &#8220;relevant&#8221;.</p>
<p><strong>Well, bollocks to both of those things.</strong></p>
<p>I think its tremendously disrespectful that Technorati has elected to ignore a ton of great postings for the sake of expediency, and worse yet, <a href="http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/11/05/technorati-deletes-index-hopes-customers-wont-notice/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.zoliblog.com');" target="_blank"><strong>not really even tell anyone about it</strong></a>, perhaps thinking that no one would notice &#8212; even if its &#8216;temporary&#8217;.  It is doing a great job of hastening its own irrelevance, and I can see with the recent WordPress 2.3.x update that it is becoming even more irrelevant still.</p>
<p>For those who haven&#8217;t yet upgraded (and you should, although watch out for the business about categories and tagging), you will find out when you do that on your WordPress Dashboard the <a href="http://www.online-tech-tips.com/wordpress/how-to-revert-back-to-technorati-links-in-the-wordpress-23-dashboard/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.online-tech-tips.com');" target="_blank">incoming links are no longer powered by Technorati</a>, but by Google Blogsearch.</p>
<p>Now, when I found out about this change, I was going to install <a href="http://www.nusuni.com/blog/nusuni-technorati-links-wordpress-plugin/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.nusuni.com');" target="_blank">this plugin to revert things back</a> (and I still may &#8212; I am small minded after all) &#8212; but with how Technorati has shrunk its index &#8230; well, bollocks indeed, Technorati, bollocks indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/06/technorati-dumps-on-small-minded-bloggers-yours-truly-included/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

