<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Deep Jive Interests &#187; GrandCentral</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/category/grandcentral/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Web 2.0, Social Media, Marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 02:51:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Unanswered Question About GrandCentral</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/06/25/the-unanswered-question-about-grandcentral/</link>
		<comments>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/06/25/the-unanswered-question-about-grandcentral/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Hung</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GrandCentral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Arrington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/06/25/the-unanswered-question-about-grandcentral/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not that its going to be sold &#8212; there are lots of folks who think that its going to happen.  For what its worth, I think it makes a lot of sense, from Google&#8217;s own desire to organize the world&#8217;s (&#8230;)</p><p><a href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/06/25/the-unanswered-question-about-grandcentral/">Read the rest of this entry &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/google-to-acquire-grand-central-for-50-million/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.techcrunch.com');">Not that its going to be sold</a> &#8212; there are lots of folks who think that its going to happen. </p>
<p>For what its worth, I think it makes a lot of sense, from <a target="_blank" href="http://www.google.com/corporate/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.google.com');">Google&#8217;s own desire to organize the world&#8217;s information</a>.  GrandCentral allows users to have a central phone number, but it also allows users to access phone messages, address books, and all manner of goodies through a completely digital / online interface.</p>
<p>With this acquisition, it will allow Google to organize, track, and categorize phone messages &#8212; and give it a foothold in an arena that it hasn&#8217;t yet spread its vast tentacles into.</p>
<p>So what I mean about the &#8220;unanswered question&#8221;?</p>
<p>Well, I&#8217;ll start with this.  I was interested in trying GrandCentral.  Lots of pleasant hype.  <a target="_blank" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19196680/site/newsweek/page/0/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.msnbc.msn.com');">Mike Arrington gave it his blessing</a> out of all other web applications he&#8217;s reviewed in recent weeks.  Fine and dandy.</p>
<p>Now, GrandCentral&#8217;s &#8220;one phone number&#8221; thing means that it will ring all of your other phone numbers when a central number is called.  Pretty cool, right?  You only have to hand out a single phone number again. </p>
<p><strong>So, the question *I* had were there any extra charges with GrandCentral?</strong>  No, I don&#8217;t mean with the Beta, because all is free during the Beta.  Rather, are there any extra *phone* charges?  Am I going to get dinged with a long distance charge every time I get an incoming call because its telephone technology?</p>
<p>Hey &#8212; <a target="_blank" href="http://grandcentral.com/support/howitworks/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/grandcentral.com');">there isn&#8217;t a FAQ to address this issue</a> (maybe there should be &#8212; or maybe I couldn&#8217;t find it).</p>
<p><strong>Answer:</strong> There should in fact be no extra charges on any of your listed phones.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s why.  When you sign up with GrandCentral, it will ask you to determine that phone number &#8212; that central &#8220;one phone number to rule them all&#8221; number.  As long as you pick a phone number in an area code that all of your other phone numbers are in (or, an area code where long distance charges aren&#8217;t applied to your phone number), you should be fine &#8212; because GrandCentral calls &#8220;from&#8221; that area code.</p>
<p><strong>Example:</strong> I got phone number in San Franciso.  When I get calls from that number to any phone number that I list as ones they should call (when that universal phone number gets rung)?  San Francisco, California!</p>
<p>Now the only problem is that it doesn&#8217;t yet have service in Toronto, or Canada for that matter.  When it does &#8212; and with that Google acquisition on the horizon, you can bet it probably will &#8212; a more in depth review will be forthwith!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/06/25/the-unanswered-question-about-grandcentral/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

