<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Deep Jive Interests &#187; Google Shares</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/category/google-shares/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Web 2.0, Social Media, Marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:37:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Google Shares: Its &#8220;Meh&#8221;, But That&#8217;s Ok.  Here&#8217;s Why.</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/09/20/google-shares-its-meh-but-thats-ok-heres-why/</link>
		<comments>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/09/20/google-shares-its-meh-but-thats-ok-heres-why/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 20:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Hung</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Shares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Bookmarking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/09/20/google-shares-its-meh-but-thats-ok-heres-why/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may have heard that Google is launching a social bookmarking-type service today, called Google Shares.  Loads of coverage from the usual suspects, most of whom aren&#8217;t all that impressed, as its a pretty unsophisticated service that &#8220;even&#8221; allows you to bookmark *other* socially driven sites like Del.icio.us amongst other sites.
What&#8217;s the bloody point [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may have heard that Google is <a href="http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2007/09/google-shared-stuff.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/googlesystem.blogspot.com');" target="_blank">launching a social bookmarking-type service today</a>, called Google Shares.  Loads of coverage from the <a href="http://mashable.com/2007/09/20/google-shared-stuff/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/mashable.com');" target="_blank">usual</a> <a href="http://startupnewz.com/blog/2007/09/20/google-enters-social-bookmarking-space-digg-and-stumble-upon-better-watchout/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/startupnewz.com');" target="_blank">suspects</a>, <a href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/09/google-shared-stuff-is-delicious.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.marketingpilgrim.com');" target="_blank">most</a> <a href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/09/20/google-gets-into-the-social-swing/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.mathewingram.com');" target="_blank">of</a> <a href="http://franticindustries.com/blog/2007/09/20/google-shared-stuff-nice-but-nothing-special/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/franticindustries.com');" target="_blank">whom</a> <a href="http://searchengineland.com/070920-084335.php" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/searchengineland.com');" target="_blank">aren&#8217;t</a> <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/20/google-wants-you-to-share-stuff/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.techcrunch.com');" target="_blank">all</a> that impressed, as its a pretty unsophisticated service that &#8220;even&#8221; allows you to bookmark *other* socially driven sites like Del.icio.us amongst other sites.</p>
<p><strong>What&#8217;s the bloody point in all of this?</strong></p>
<p>Is this yet-another half-baked Google product that is doomed to mediocrity?  I think that we won&#8217;t really know until it all pans out, but in this case, I think its an issue of Google creating something that is quite deliberately a &#8220;me-too&#8221; type product.</p>
<p>Usually<strong> </strong>these fail.  But <strong>this just isn&#8217;t &#8220;any&#8221;</strong> company &#8212; this is Google, the 900 lb Gorrila that only needs to break wind to turn Steve Ballmer into a quivering mass of incoherent insults (although, granted, it doesn&#8217;t take much to do that).</p>
<p>No, I think Google will <strong>probably do just fine in copying many features</strong> as it finds necessary, and then rolling it out quietly between its users who are also, quietly, using iGoogle, Google Reader, Gmail, Google Docs, and Picasa.  While it _could_ do so, I don&#8217;t think Google needs to do anything extra other than keep up with other social news / bookmarking features, and keep itself at parity.</p>
<p>And let the non-early adopters who are familiar with Google to start having fun with this service, as it can probably be integrated fairly easily into its own suite of products.</p>
<p><strong>Another rosy-glasses way </strong>to look at it is that by joining the social bookmarking / news group, particularly as you&#8217;ll be able to share stuff from other social sites, is that it will increase awareness *of* these other sites as well.</p>
<p>You know what they say about a rising tide and all that.</p>
<p>So, yes, you might think that Google Shares is &#8220;meh&#8221;.  And it might be.  But I don&#8217;t think Google&#8217;s really worried about it at this point, for a whole bunch of reasons.  And even if it doesn&#8217;t really evolve into a killer product, there are reasons for _that_ as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/09/20/google-shares-its-meh-but-thats-ok-heres-why/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
