<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Deep Jive Interests &#187; Don Dodge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/category/don-dodge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Web 2.0, Social Media, Marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 02:51:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Would An OpenSocial API &#8220;Matter&#8221; If Everyone Who Mattered Was On Facebook?</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/02/would-an-opensocial-api-matter-if-everyone-who-mattered-was-on-facebook/</link>
		<comments>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/02/would-an-opensocial-api-matter-if-everyone-who-mattered-was-on-facebook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 15:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Hung</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Don Dodge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Schonfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenSocial API]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/02/would-an-opensocial-api-matter-if-everyone-who-mattered-was-on-facebook/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a theoretical question to lob at you before the weekend: in all the clamour around an OpenSocial API, and how the blogosphere is polarizing it (hyping it) to be a Facebook vs. Google and Superfriends cage-match, when would an (&#8230;)</p><p><a href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/02/would-an-opensocial-api-matter-if-everyone-who-mattered-was-on-facebook/">Read the rest of this entry &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/shoulder_shrug.jpg" alt="Will Average Facebookers Care About OpenSocial API’s?" /></p>
<p>Just a theoretical question to lob at you before the weekend: in all the clamour around an OpenSocial API, and how the blogosphere is polarizing it (hyping it) to be a Facebook vs. Google and Superfriends cage-match, when would an OpenSocial API *not* matter?</p>
<p><strong>How about if everyone who &#8220;mattered&#8221; was already on Facebook</strong>, and was experiencing enough lock-down that they didn&#8217;t want to move social networks, and simply don&#8217;t care about the amazing cross-social applications that are developed across MySpace, Friendster, Oracle, Salesforce, and so on &#8212; because they simply don&#8217;t have friends or identities across such networks &#8230; yes, for the sake of such an example, let&#8217;s say that they either didn&#8217;t use, or didn&#8217;t care about the data and information stored through their email accounts either.</p>
<p>Now, to be sure that&#8217;s an extreme example of things, but I only use it to illustrate that voices like <a href="http://dondodge.typepad.com/the_next_big_thing/2007/11/50m-facebook-us.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/dondodge.typepad.com');" target="_blank">Don Dodge</a> and <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.techcrunch.com');" target="_blank">Eric Schonfeld</a> are worth listening to: the movement towards an open set of standards so social networks can communicate is a good thing &#8230; <strong>BUT &#8212; let&#8217;s not sell the power of network effects short.  </strong></p>
<p>In a very real, material sense, <strong>many people won&#8217;t notice or care </strong>&#8230; even if they&#8217;re told about the OpenSocial API explicitly.  And that&#8217;s because for many &#8220;average&#8221; Facebookers,  {and I tend to think about the kind of non-tech people at work, say, in hospital, who all love Facebook} <strong>many of their friends are not on any other networks.  </strong>Many of them might have identities, or might use other networks peripherally, but to many of them there is only one which &#8220;matters&#8221; (with all due respect to <a href="http://www.sixapart.com/about/news/2007/11/opensocial_kill.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.sixapart.com');" target="_blank">Anil Dash and his colorful examples</a> of friends and family using Vox, Livejournal, Typepad, and Photobucket) &#8212; because its a (recursive) function of where they spend their time, because its where their friends spend their time.</p>
<p>Facebook might have an advantage to abandoning their own standards for the OpenSocial API, but I don&#8217;t think that they&#8217;re in any position where they might need to be &#8220;forced&#8221; to; put it more bluntly, I don&#8217;t think that the failure to adopt an OpenSocial API will result in a loss of growth, due to, for example, people wanting to use new applications that aren&#8217;t able to reach into Facebook&#8217;s closed garden.</p>
<p>Rather, <strong>I expect many people to continue to have blank looks and shrug</strong> if I even put &#8220;OpenSocial API&#8221; and &#8220;Facebook&#8221; into the same sentence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/02/would-an-opensocial-api-matter-if-everyone-who-mattered-was-on-facebook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

