I usually love meeting bloggers in person. For me, certainly, its a chance to talk about things that I rarely get a chance to talk about with friends in my own social circle — and I think my wife has heard my crackpot theories about Digg about once too many times. But as I bask in the warm togetherness of happy memories, there is one funny downside to meeting bloggers in person.

And that’s when you actually do … its hard to write about them critically thereafter.

Take Dell’s most recent gaffe, for example.

I was going to write about it one way — but, well, some recent experiences made me almost change my mind.  For example, I’ve found that when you meet bloggers in person they’re all reasonably normal in their sense of humour, outlook on life, and how they like to keep their sense of personal space. Happily, everyone I’ve met seems normal in that regard.

And that’s the problem.

Sort of.

Before, you were happily analyzing what they might say or do with a coldly critical eye, without a care in the world about throw out a jovial remark or three in a blog post, sometimes personal, sometimes not.

Now — you kind of second guess yourself. Wait — they aren’t really thinking that, were they? Hold on, perhaps *this* is what they meant. I was going to write “hackneyed, tired and pedestrian”, but perhaps I should rather substitute “… this was not, actually, their best effort?”

At Mesh, for example, I met Lionel Menchaca, the guy who blogs for Dell at Direct2Dell. A brilliantly humble fellow. To be honest, you can’t help but like the guy. Now, recently there was a dust up around how a former manager at Dell released some thoughts about the purchasing experience at one of those Dell kiosks you might see at a Mall. It was published at the Consumerist, Dell got upset, asked it to be taken down — and voila. Streisand Effect.

[where trying to remove a piece of information causes more backlash and publicity than the initial offending piece of information]

Good ol’ Lionel has a post apologizing for their goof up, titled “23 Confessions”.

Now, I think that there is a lot to learn from Dell, in the way that they’ve engaged their consumer base to try and turn things around. Furthermore, Lionel’s Mea Culpa on behalf of Dell is the right way to do things. Do it quickly, do it honestly, and keep the conversation open on all frequencies.

That’s good.

The post, “23 Confessions”?

The pre-Mesh Tony [who, let’s say was in a deliciously foul mood] might have said “this piece is nothing more than a thinly veiled attempt at damage control, and in the context of their prior efforts, is seriously lacking; moreover, several of these confessions are not “confessions” at all, but unabashedly contrived attempts at selling more of Dell’s stuff.”

The post-Mesh Tony, on the other hand, might say something like “Dell’s making a good attempt at customer relations, and while some of these confessions aren’t quite confessions — its clear that they’re meant to be taken tongue in cheek. Good for Lionel.”

And I suppose what this all *really* means is that its been an epiphany for me as a blogger. Journalists, for example, have had to deal with interpersonal conflicts between what needs to be put down on paper and the relationships they have made with people in industry to get the story — relationships that need to continue to allow a certain degree of access that is critical for their continued success.

Bloggers, on the other hand, particularly ones that blog about topic events, may never get close to the participants or newsmakers in their field of interest. They write “at a distance”, and I think, in some respects, that its a good thing. It keeps the ideas and opinions impartial — or certainly more impartial than if you’re in the thick of things.

Now that I’ve had the pleasure of meeting a few interesting individuals in the area that I write about, will that change what I’m going to write? Will it water down my opinions, or cause me to pause as I prepare a particularly acerbic post?

Well, I really, really hope not.

Rather, I’m hoping that as I mature as a blogger, that I’ll be able to divorce my opinions of the people that I meet from their actions, their words and their deeds. You know how it is — hate the sin, love the sinner and all of that. After all, at the end of the day, they are all real people who are trying to make a go of things in their own way. Yes, even Ted Murphy, CEO of PayPerPost, who is vilified in the blogosphere is actually quite affable, honest and transparent about exactly what he intends to do. And Loren Feldman, who can appear brash and abrasive, is actually a really nice guy. Heck, even though he was prepared to hate Mike Arrington, it seems like even he was taken aback by how easy going (and real) Mike Arrington was.

So, will it be a little harder to write some posts about some people? Probably.

But will it stop me from telling it like I see it?

Not a chance. ;)

Jun
17
2007
10:42 pm

Mark Relph talks to Will Pate, Jordan Banks, and Lionel Menchacha about How To Build a Community

  • “Community means different things to different people — what does community to you or organization?”
    • LM: Communities can be formed around similar interests or common goals.  We look at things in terms of our customer base.  We use things like blogs ad ideastorm to build that sense of community — and give people a reason to work with and interact with Dell.
    • WP: Communities mean I can go to a conference and talk to people and do so without a badge for most of it! (laughter).  Community is those who engage with you. RE: CommandN –what it means is stories that are fed to me and Amber every day and commenting and evangelizing for us.  We all have day jobs, so we rely on our fans to do that for us.
    • JB: Community means people who have my back.  Who have my interests in mind — who want good things for me and are willing to make it happen.  Its not a very different online than off.  We think of community as people with like passions and desires who get together.  We never lose sight of who our bosses are, and they are people who use the site.
  • “What about awesomeness?”
    • WP: People are attracted to things that are awesome — people will get passionate about it and get attracted to it.  That’s my theory.
  • “What has been the implications does community have for your business?”
    • LM: Before we launched our community initiatives, our focus was on launching things and focusing things on how great Dell was.  It was a change where we became more customer centric — the blog and ideastorm is what its all about.  Ideastorm was launched 4 months ago, and its the combination of Digg and a messageboard.  Anyone can login and submit an idea about how we can make things better.  The voting helps decide which ideas are popular.  If we launched this tool it wasn’t going to work, and that’s why action is important.
  • “Has there been an internal fight around transparency?”
    • LM: At Dell its not something we had.  Michael Dell himself has been passionate about it, and he was behind launching Ideastorm right away.  Different heads of businesses need to be aware of what’s coming through to Ideastorm and they are.
  • “What about taking feedbacking and using it?”
    • JB: Its hard to hide on the Internet.  The biggest successes involve listening to the community.  The challenge involves trying to listen to disparate opinions.  The best thing to do is to acknowledge that they’ve been heard, if not acted upon, and the reasons behind it.  We fail probably more than we succeed — but at least we try and that’s important.
  • “How do you *do* it?”
    • WP: A lot of companies go in and try and expect something magical to grow; figure out where your passionate users are.  They might be on blogs, facebook, or wherever.  Its important to listen to what the rules of engagement and rules of the game — listen first.  Then ask questions.
  • “Is it important to own these things?”
    • WP: Its always good to have someone pushing it — like an evangelist.  Community success is probably defined about what people internally say as well.  You don’t have to be perfect — but you do have to be honest.
    • JB: At the heart of the community is passion.  And its easy to figure out what those favourites are.  Its easy to think of community as a vertical function — we tried to do that and we weren’t good with that.  Rather than having community as a vertical silent function, we now run it horizontally along the entire company, through different departments.
May
31
2007
3:28 pm