<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Deep Jive Interests &#187; Bing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/category/bing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Web 2.0, Social Media, Marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 02:51:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bing Bigger Than Digg? Twitter? Not Quite.</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2009/07/09/bing-bigger-than-digg-twitter-not-quite/</link>
		<comments>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2009/07/09/bing-bigger-than-digg-twitter-not-quite/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 12:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Hung</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Parr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mashable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/?p=1530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Parr at Mashable says Bing, Microsoft&#8217;s latest search engine offering, is doing well.  So well, in fact, that its bigger than Digg, Twitter and CNN. But none of that matters if Bing doesn’t grow and find a way to (&#8230;)</p><p><a href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2009/07/09/bing-bigger-than-digg-twitter-not-quite/">Read the rest of this entry &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben Parr at Mashable says Bing, Microsoft&#8217;s latest search engine offering, is doing well.  So well, in fact, that its bigger than Digg, Twitter and CNN.</p>
<blockquote>
<p style="margin-bottom: 1em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-left: 0px; line-height: 1.5; text-align: justify; padding: 0px;">But none of that matters if Bing doesn’t grow and find a way to compete with <span style="white-space: nowrap;">Google<span style="white-space: nowrap;"> </span></span>. So after a month, where are we? We knew that <a style="text-decoration: none; color: #409ed3;" href="http://mashable.com/2009/06/17/bing-keeps-growing/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/mashable.com');">Bing was growing</a>, but the numbers being released tonight tell a tale of success, as Bing is now the 13th most visited site on the web.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 1em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-left: 0px; line-height: 1.5; text-align: justify; padding: 0px;">According to <a style="text-decoration: none; color: #409ed3;" href="http://compete.com/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/compete.com');" target="_blank">Compete.com</a>, Bing was able to amass 49.57 million unique visitors in its first month as Microsoft’s official search engine. Bing’s traffic trumps that of <a style="text-decoration: none; color: #409ed3;" href="http://mashable.com/category/digg" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/mashable.com');">Digg</a><span style="white-space: nowrap;"> </span> (38.96 million) <a style="text-decoration: none; color: #409ed3;" href="http://mashable.com/tag/twitter" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/mashable.com');">Twitter</a> (23 million), and <a style="text-decoration: none; color: #409ed3;" href="http://cnn.com/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/cnn.com');" target="_blank">CNN</a> (28.54 million). We want to stress that this focuses on U.S. visitors, since Compete does not track international visits.</p>
</blockquote>
<p style="margin-bottom: 1em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-left: 0px; line-height: 1.5; text-align: justify; padding: 0px;">The problem is that all of those stats are quite misleading without attributing the fact that Microsoft&#8217;s previous search engine, Live.com, redirects directly to Bing.com.  If you look at the stats for Live.com, you&#8217;ll notice that prior to Bing.com it hit an apogee of around 100 million visitors per month.  In fact, I&#8217;d say that since traffic for Bing is &#8220;only&#8221; at around half of what Live.com was the month prior to its debut, its probably far too early to tell how popular it actually is.</p>
<p><a href="http://siteanalytics.compete.com/bing.com+live.com+cnn.com/?metric=uv" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/siteanalytics.compete.com');"><img src="http://grapher.compete.com/bing.com+live.com+cnn.com_uv_460.png" alt="" /></a></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 1em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-left: 0px; line-height: 1.5; text-align: justify; padding: 0px;">Furthermore, when you take into consideration that MSN.com directly feeds into Bing (previously Live) at the top of its page (primo real estate if there ever was any), and that MSN.com is the default home page for millions of Internet Explorer home pages, its further reason to take it all with a grain of salt.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 1em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-left: 0px; line-height: 1.5; text-align: justify; padding: 0px;">I think the jury&#8217;s out on how popular Bing is &#8212; and with all due respect to Ben Parr,  that jury&#8217;s only due in several months I&#8217;d say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2009/07/09/bing-bigger-than-digg-twitter-not-quite/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

