<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Just How Vulnerable Is FriendFeed To Spam?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2008/07/14/just-how-vulnerable-is-friendfeed-to-spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2008/07/14/just-how-vulnerable-is-friendfeed-to-spam/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Web 2.0, Social Media, Marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 06:10:44 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Dykeman</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2008/07/14/just-how-vulnerable-is-friendfeed-to-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-162664</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Dykeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/?p=1337#comment-162664</guid>
		<description>Maybe I don&#039;t worry enough about this stuff, but it would seem to me that the FriendFeed community itself can probably police this problem OK by means of peer pressure, internal communication, and so on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I don&#8217;t worry enough about this stuff, but it would seem to me that the FriendFeed community itself can probably police this problem OK by means of peer pressure, internal communication, and so on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
