Why PageRank Still Means Something To Me

Google’s PageRank Update — I am Removing Paid Links

Well, looks like there’s another PageRank update underway, and it looks like this blog has been penalized / slapped down, for what I can only imagine is the fact that I have paid links on this site (or, used to be: read on). It used to have a PageRank of 6, and now its been kicked down to a humble 3, and yet others being zero.

Is it a surprise to me? Well, no. I mean, as you may have noticed (or not, if you only read this through your feed reader of choice), that Text Link Ads, the company which puts puts the Pay in Paid Links, has generously sponsored this site for many months (I used to have a giant banner on the top of this blog).

Now, at this point, many bloggers would beat their chest and throw up the proverbial finger to Google. Furthermore, they would include other culturally appropriate / rude gestures as well in the mix, ending with the “PageRank don’t mean squat to me, it shouldn’t mean squat to you, and I’m just going to carry on selling links”.

Well, here’s a sad, shallow, fact about me.

I *do* care about this site’s PageRank.

And it doesn’t have anything to do with this site’s perceived traffic, which is minimal to begin with, and which I don’t believe will materially change with the downgrading of my pagerank; nor does it have anything to do with PageRank as a metric that is used by other sites to rank DJI — for example, ironically, text link ads.

No, the reason why I do care is because, to *me*, its a yardstick of how well I’ve done with this blog over the past year (almost two) that I’ve been blogging for, independently of traffic, as its all about the quality of their inbound links.

And you know what?

I like that metric.

This blog has humble amounts of traffic and a humbler amount of people subscribing to my feed, but the quality of those in bound links don’t have anything to do with that. And for a guy who

  • blogs part time,
  • only writes opinion columns,
  • is rarely in a position to break news,
  • doesn’t write link-bait material

… I’m rather proud of how far this blog has come — and for those reasons, I don’t mind people checking out my PageRank, as it stacks up to other blogs which have a lot more traffic / much more popular than mine.

And in many respects, that public metric, to me, is a measure of the great links I’ve accumulated over the past year or so, such as TechCrunch, Mashable, Valleywag, ReadWriteWeb, 37Signals, CNet, Direct2Dell, and the UK’s Guardian Unlimited are included as well.

To me, those inbound links are a small recognition that someone somewhere (’professional’) thinks my writing is worth something. And if PageRank is one of the only well recognized, albeit troubled, public validation of that metric, then its one whose rules I will have to respect and abide by.

The bottom line is that I’ve realized what those links mean to me, and as a surrogate, what PageRank means to me, and they are worth much more than what any specific sponsorships or paid links bring in.

So, I would like to publicly thank Patrick Gavin who has been nothing but gracious and supportive of this blog, but as of today, I will no longer be accepting paid text links, nor allowing public sponsorship of this blog *by* Text-Link-Ads.com, in hopes that one day my PageRank might be restored.

(And yea, I do recognize that Google is a fickle creature, and lo, I may not have my PageRank restored even though I do banish these looked-down-upon practices … by Google).

Am I making a lot of sense?  Am I merely being weak and vain in the face of The All-Mighty (Google)? Shouldn’t I take a stand on all of this on principle?

I don’t know the answers to much yet, except that for the time being my answers are “maybe”, “yes”, and “not right now”.

6 Comments

  1. Posted March 1, 2008 at 8:33 pm | Permalink

    I totally understand how you feel on thgis Tony as I jealously guard my measely PR of 5 and wouldn’t do something that might endanger it. I may not agree with Google’s policy on it but hey .. When in Rome .. ya gotta still play by goolge’s rules :)

  2. Posted March 1, 2008 at 9:02 pm | Permalink

    Hey Steve — thanks for the support. Quite frankly, I don’t think Winextra gets the pub *it* deserves either. :)

    Cheers
    t @ dji

  3. Posted March 3, 2008 at 1:48 pm | Permalink

    Yep its definitely the TextLinkAds. That’s the only difference I can think of between DeepJive and mine or WinExtra. Oh, other than your blog has better writing overall. ;)

  4. Posted March 3, 2008 at 3:56 pm | Permalink

    @Webomatica — no … no I don’t think so. I think its only Text-Link-Ads, actually. :)

  5. Posted March 4, 2008 at 8:24 am | Permalink

    Hmmm…I just went from 6 to 4. I also use Text Link Ads.

    The problem is, TextLinkAds don’t include the NoFollow code that Google wants to see. It seems tome that we should be able to modify TLA’s plugin to insert that code. But let’s face it: that’s why TLA advertisers are paying to advertise on our sites. They want to punch up their page rank. The ads are unrelated to content and I seriously doubt if anyone clicks on them.

    It becomes a measure of what’s more important: the Google assigned rank or the revenue. TLA payments cover all of my blogging expenses. AdSense revenue does not. The pay per click model is losing ground as Web surfers become more savvy and recognize ads for what they are. This is clear to me: most of my AdSense revenue comes from a local interest site that gets a fraction of the traffic of my main blog, which covers (among other things) tech content.

    What’s more important to me? I’m not sure. Google Page Rank IS a vanity thing. It certainly doesn’t lead to more clicks on AdSense ads. I like having my blogging expenses paid for, but, in general, I don’t like the quality of TLA advertisers. (I reject about 1/2 the ads submitted.) We’ll see how things go and whether TLA does something to improve the situation.

  6. Posted March 5, 2008 at 5:53 am | Permalink

    Tony,

    I never had advertising of ANY kind at Conversation Agent, ever. My links and traffic have always been genuine, yet my PageRank just went from 6 to 4 without any rhyme or reason. No explanation, no recourse, just a what? Penalty? Why? Google is probably too big, too important to care… I do and I will remember.

3 Trackbacks

  1. [...] adamcpennington [...]

  2. [...] Published March 1, 2008 Blogging , Web Tags: Google, PageRank I’d heard from Tony Hung at Deep Jive Interests that there has been another PageRank update, and out of curiosity I went online and checked the [...]

  3. By Google PageRank update? | BloggerTalks on March 2, 2008 at 5:45 pm

    [...] Rumor has it that there’s a Google PageRank update in the works, possibly already rolling out. Anyone seen or heard anything? Via! [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.

Powered by WP Hashcash