February 24th, 2008 at 1:36 pm

Twitter is a bit of a psychedelic experience

Just read Mr. Rheingold’s thoughts on Twitter (he’s the chap behind Smart Mobs), and I think I can sum it up even more succinctly than he can (granted, his answer was off the cuff when asked by a student), i.e. the answer to “why are you hooked on Twitter?”

My answer? <drum roll please>

Its because I can listen and participate, in real time, with a giant chat room full off interesting people, who at any given time, are thinking out loud, reporting on things they find important, but doing so in a fairly terse and concise way; and, who are almost always reachable and generally approachable about answering any particular question you might have.

Ok, fine. Its a long sentence. :)

The importance of that above explanation is partially dependent on the quality of people in the chat room, i.e. the people who you are following on Twitter, and how important what they’re doing at any one time is to you, but also dependent on the fact that Twitter necessarily restricts you to 140 characters, meaning there’s little room for bluster or irrelevant blatherings (although there are exceptions) by well meaning “friends”.

This is a good thing, because, as a whole, reducing the irrelevancy of stuff will necessarily increase the overall utility and relevancy of the remaining “content”.

Furthermore, because you can Twitter while not tethered to a desk/lap top, its possible to provide insights and report on observations while you’re out doing / seeing stuff, as in conferences, meet ups and much more. There’s a reason why Twitter took off at SXSW last year, and that’s because people were using it to report on stuff they were seeing, attending, editorialize it with their own thoughts, and other, more practical things, like where to meet up for drinks.

Not philosophical enough for you?

Well, if you wanted to get philosophical, you could phrase it thusly (I know its not really a word, “thusly”, but anyway) — getting hooked into Twitter is almost like a bit of a psychedelic experience, in that its like getting hooked into a shared consciousness, where, if you’ve got the appropriate Twitter appliance, you’ll discover an automatic flowing stream of thoughts, feelings, observations, and terse insights of a very interesting crowd of peers.

Without any pharmaceutical aids, that is. :)

Now whether or not you find that something that is utterly fascinating, utterly useful, or an utter waste of time (and its not mutually exclusive, really), is probably a function of a number of things.

But if you don’t “get” it, the best thing to do is just experience it, preferably by “friending” people you know, which is getting easier all the time with Twitter’s ability to find people that you might know, and get you hooked up into ‘finding’ them on Twitter.

5 Responses to “Summing Up Twitter In One (Long) Sentence”

  1. John Furrier :

    that post was funny as hell.. whoa :-)

  2. Tony Hung :

    Thanks, man. :)

    “Woah”, indeed!

    Cheers
    t @ dji

  3. Robert Seidman :

    Howard is a good guy but a long-standing Kool-Aide drinker. He’s been sipping at the cup for well over 20 years now!

    He loved The Well, which was very popular in the 80s and early 90s, but now most people online have never used it or even heard of it. He loved Hotwired. Gone. He loves all the aspects of virtual communities, and this I pretty much share with him.

    There’s no doubt in my mind that one to many broadcast IM will stick around. But there is also no doubt in my mind it will never ever be as popular as e-mail or one-to-one instant messaging/texting.

    There is some considerable doubt in my mind whether Twitter survives. I think it far more likely that if there’s any kind of mainstream acceptance of Twitter style one-to-many broadcast IM, it will be built-in to existing IM platforms (AIM, Yahoo Messenger, etc) or whatever those platforms evolve into.

  4. The appeal of Twitter — part XVII - - mathewingram.com/work :

    […] about why he has started using the app, along with some follow-ups from my friend Tony Hung at Deep Jive Interests and from Nick Bradbury of […]

  5. Tony Hung :

    @Robert — I think it remains to be seen exactly what will happen with Twitter, and if it catches on with the mainstream community.

    In order to fully participate and get something out of it, you have to fully engage with your twitter-stream, and furthermore, find people who are similarly willing to do so.

    I consider myself a bit of an early adopter, and its taken me something like a year to really “get” it (I was blogging about this almost a year ago, actually, and my initial posts said I didn’t get it).

    Now, granted, perhaps digital “natives” will have a shorter lead in / run in time, but its one thing that might work against greater uptake of this kind of service.

    But, hey, you never know, I guess — particularly, if, as you say, some of bigger servicess pick up on this.

    Cheers
    t @ dji

Leave a Reply.

Please note the comments policy

Feb
24
2008
1:36 pm