<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Om Malik Was Right: With Facebook, Your Opt In Status Doesn&#8217;t Make A Whit Of Difference.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/12/01/om-malik-was-right-with-facebook-your-opt-in-status-doesnt-make-a-whit-of-difference/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/12/01/om-malik-was-right-with-facebook-your-opt-in-status-doesnt-make-a-whit-of-difference/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Web 2.0, Social Media, Marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:17:06 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Advertising&#8217;s newest snake in the grass — Shooting at Bubbles</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/12/01/om-malik-was-right-with-facebook-your-opt-in-status-doesnt-make-a-whit-of-difference/comment-page-1/#comment-226279</link>
		<dc:creator>Advertising&#8217;s newest snake in the grass — Shooting at Bubbles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 03:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/12/01/om-malik-was-right-with-facebook-your-opt-in-status-doesnt-make-a-whit-of-difference/#comment-226279</guid>
		<description>[...] only thing that selecting to opt-in does is make public the data Facebook is already collecting. As Tony Hung at Deep Jive Interests accurately phrases it: Above and beyond the fact that opting out of “publishing the information [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] only thing that selecting to opt-in does is make public the data Facebook is already collecting. As Tony Hung at Deep Jive Interests accurately phrases it: Above and beyond the fact that opting out of “publishing the information [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deep Jive Interests &#187; One Last Late Thought On Facebook&#8217;s Beacon Buckling Down</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/12/01/om-malik-was-right-with-facebook-your-opt-in-status-doesnt-make-a-whit-of-difference/comment-page-1/#comment-106822</link>
		<dc:creator>Deep Jive Interests &#187; One Last Late Thought On Facebook&#8217;s Beacon Buckling Down</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 04:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/12/01/om-malik-was-right-with-facebook-your-opt-in-status-doesnt-make-a-whit-of-difference/#comment-106822</guid>
		<description>[...] that Mark Zuckerburg&#8217;s mea culpa doesn&#8217;t directly address the troubling evidence that Beacon transmits data to Facebook, irrespective of whether you&#8217;re logged in.  Which leads one to wonder even if you&#8217;ve opted out of Beacon, whether Facebook is still [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that Mark Zuckerburg&#8217;s mea culpa doesn&#8217;t directly address the troubling evidence that Beacon transmits data to Facebook, irrespective of whether you&#8217;re logged in.  Which leads one to wonder even if you&#8217;ve opted out of Beacon, whether Facebook is still [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryanol</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/12/01/om-malik-was-right-with-facebook-your-opt-in-status-doesnt-make-a-whit-of-difference/comment-page-1/#comment-105551</link>
		<dc:creator>ryanol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 23:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/12/01/om-malik-was-right-with-facebook-your-opt-in-status-doesnt-make-a-whit-of-difference/#comment-105551</guid>
		<description>I just don&#039;t get it facebook is a website...they together with their partners aggregate user information....whats the big deal?

Who says we always get the option to opt out?

If its you Tony....please put in the word for me at Transunion, Experian, and Equifax....what the hey, in honor of Cosmo Kramer might as well throw the good ole USPS into the ring also.
;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just don&#8217;t get it facebook is a website&#8230;they together with their partners aggregate user information&#8230;.whats the big deal?</p>
<p>Who says we always get the option to opt out?</p>
<p>If its you Tony&#8230;.please put in the word for me at Transunion, Experian, and Equifax&#8230;.what the hey, in honor of Cosmo Kramer might as well throw the good ole USPS into the ring also.<br />
;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/12/01/om-malik-was-right-with-facebook-your-opt-in-status-doesnt-make-a-whit-of-difference/comment-page-1/#comment-105517</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/12/01/om-malik-was-right-with-facebook-your-opt-in-status-doesnt-make-a-whit-of-difference/#comment-105517</guid>
		<description>The last time a company merged browsing behavior with personally-identifiable information (PII), 10 states sued them. (Remember the DoubleClick fiasco? see http://www.clickz.com/showPage.html?page=1455141)

Facebook needs to be careful here, lest they be labeled spyware 2.0. Just when you thought it was safe to go back into the Web ...

The extent of Facebook&#039;s profiling reach (PII + browsing behavior) goes well beyond beacon partners. It&#039;s anywhere they place an ad, image, etc. Or for instance, across Microsoft&#039;s entire ad network.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last time a company merged browsing behavior with personally-identifiable information (PII), 10 states sued them. (Remember the DoubleClick fiasco? see <a href="http://www.clickz.com/showPage.html?page=1455141)" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/www.clickz.com');" rel="nofollow">http://www.clickz.com/showPage.html?page=1455141)</a></p>
<p>Facebook needs to be careful here, lest they be labeled spyware 2.0. Just when you thought it was safe to go back into the Web &#8230;</p>
<p>The extent of Facebook&#8217;s profiling reach (PII + browsing behavior) goes well beyond beacon partners. It&#8217;s anywhere they place an ad, image, etc. Or for instance, across Microsoft&#8217;s entire ad network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linking Corner &#187; Li Ka-Shing thinks Facebook is cool</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/12/01/om-malik-was-right-with-facebook-your-opt-in-status-doesnt-make-a-whit-of-difference/comment-page-1/#comment-105277</link>
		<dc:creator>Linking Corner &#187; Li Ka-Shing thinks Facebook is cool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 14:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/12/01/om-malik-was-right-with-facebook-your-opt-in-status-doesnt-make-a-whit-of-difference/#comment-105277</guid>
		<description>[...] with Facebook, especially with a lot of native competitors and copycats already in place (at least their newest monetizing-bruhaha should be in full compliance with China&#8217;s whistleblowing-requirements). My guessing would be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with Facebook, especially with a lot of native competitors and copycats already in place (at least their newest monetizing-bruhaha should be in full compliance with China&#8217;s whistleblowing-requirements). My guessing would be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Advertising&#8217;s newest snake in the grass &#124; WinExtra</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/12/01/om-malik-was-right-with-facebook-your-opt-in-status-doesnt-make-a-whit-of-difference/comment-page-1/#comment-105109</link>
		<dc:creator>Advertising&#8217;s newest snake in the grass &#124; WinExtra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 00:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/12/01/om-malik-was-right-with-facebook-your-opt-in-status-doesnt-make-a-whit-of-difference/#comment-105109</guid>
		<description>[...] only thing that selecting to opt-in does is make public the data Facebook is already collecting. As Tony Hung at Deep Jive Interests accurately phrases it: Above and beyond the fact that opting out of “publishing the information [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] only thing that selecting to opt-in does is make public the data Facebook is already collecting. As Tony Hung at Deep Jive Interests accurately phrases it: Above and beyond the fact that opting out of “publishing the information [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deep Jive Interests &#187; Facebook Bottom Line Takes Hit With Beacon Boondoggle</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/12/01/om-malik-was-right-with-facebook-your-opt-in-status-doesnt-make-a-whit-of-difference/comment-page-1/#comment-104966</link>
		<dc:creator>Deep Jive Interests &#187; Facebook Bottom Line Takes Hit With Beacon Boondoggle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 16:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/12/01/om-malik-was-right-with-facebook-your-opt-in-status-doesnt-make-a-whit-of-difference/#comment-104966</guid>
		<description>[...] I guess the bigger question is if there are other blue-chip companies who are going to follow Coke&#8217;s suit around these severe &#8220;trust issues&#8221;, and moreover, how long this &#8220;probationary period&#8221; will take particularly since it is saying one thing, and doing something very different &#8212; right now &#8212; and right to our faces. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I guess the bigger question is if there are other blue-chip companies who are going to follow Coke&#8217;s suit around these severe &#8220;trust issues&#8221;, and moreover, how long this &#8220;probationary period&#8221; will take particularly since it is saying one thing, and doing something very different &#8212; right now &#8212; and right to our faces. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
