<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Truth About Viral And Social Marketing?  Its All About The Sock Puppets.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/22/the-truth-about-viral-and-social-marketing-its-all-about-the-sock-puppets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/22/the-truth-about-viral-and-social-marketing-its-all-about-the-sock-puppets/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Web 2.0, Social Media, Marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:17:06 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: azlan</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/22/the-truth-about-viral-and-social-marketing-its-all-about-the-sock-puppets/comment-page-1/#comment-105542</link>
		<dc:creator>azlan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 23:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/22/the-truth-about-viral-and-social-marketing-its-all-about-the-sock-puppets/#comment-105542</guid>
		<description>i defenitely favour this method compare to other PPC ad.. infact there was &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.azlanhussain.com/archives/35&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a sosial marketing experiment&lt;/a&gt; done by MarketingExperiments.com which shows Social Marketing campaign yielded a 1,427% greater return on their investment, then if they ran a Google adwords campaign over a 12 month period..

cheers
Azlan
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.azlanhussain.com/sitemap&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Online Business with a kampung boy&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i defenitely favour this method compare to other PPC ad.. infact there was <a href="http://www.azlanhussain.com/archives/35" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/www.azlanhussain.com');" rel="nofollow">a sosial marketing experiment</a> done by MarketingExperiments.com which shows Social Marketing campaign yielded a 1,427% greater return on their investment, then if they ran a Google adwords campaign over a 12 month period..</p>
<p>cheers<br />
Azlan<br />
<a href="http://www.azlanhussain.com/sitemap" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/www.azlanhussain.com');" rel="nofollow">Online Business with a kampung boy</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wildfire Strategic Marketing &#124; (3i) &#187; The great viral swindle?</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/22/the-truth-about-viral-and-social-marketing-its-all-about-the-sock-puppets/comment-page-1/#comment-101686</link>
		<dc:creator>Wildfire Strategic Marketing &#124; (3i) &#187; The great viral swindle?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 17:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/22/the-truth-about-viral-and-social-marketing-its-all-about-the-sock-puppets/#comment-101686</guid>
		<description>[...] Tony Hung has a good post on this as well&#8230;. a choice bit: Mike Arrington himself seems a bit taken [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tony Hung has a good post on this as well&#8230;. a choice bit: Mike Arrington himself seems a bit taken [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: King Tut</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/22/the-truth-about-viral-and-social-marketing-its-all-about-the-sock-puppets/comment-page-1/#comment-100482</link>
		<dc:creator>King Tut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 21:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/22/the-truth-about-viral-and-social-marketing-its-all-about-the-sock-puppets/#comment-100482</guid>
		<description>&quot;Mike Arrington himself seems a bit taken aback by how honest the post is, but is anyone *really* shocked?&quot;

He ain&#039;t shocked.

He&#039;s putting on his &quot;I&#039;m on the &quot;working man&#039;s&quot; side. How dare they?!! We&#039;ll get to the bottom of this! oh noes!&quot; face...they banned my blog cuz I destroy them ;p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Mike Arrington himself seems a bit taken aback by how honest the post is, but is anyone *really* shocked?&#8221;</p>
<p>He ain&#8217;t shocked.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s putting on his &#8220;I&#8217;m on the &#8220;working man&#8217;s&#8221; side. How dare they?!! We&#8217;ll get to the bottom of this! oh noes!&#8221; face&#8230;they banned my blog cuz I destroy them ;p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: King Tut</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/22/the-truth-about-viral-and-social-marketing-its-all-about-the-sock-puppets/comment-page-1/#comment-100477</link>
		<dc:creator>King Tut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 21:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/22/the-truth-about-viral-and-social-marketing-its-all-about-the-sock-puppets/#comment-100477</guid>
		<description>&quot;Mike Arrington himself seems a bit taken aback by how honest the post is, but is anyone *really* shocked?&quot;

Yeah, I thought that was cute of him. Nice nieve-acting oh-noes! on his part: &quot;I will post a longer response to this later, but frankly I’m disgusted by this.&quot;

And I love how they block my trackback -- guess I bitch them out too much. Go figure. Pussies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Mike Arrington himself seems a bit taken aback by how honest the post is, but is anyone *really* shocked?&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, I thought that was cute of him. Nice nieve-acting oh-noes! on his part: &#8220;I will post a longer response to this later, but frankly I’m disgusted by this.&#8221;</p>
<p>And I love how they block my trackback &#8212; guess I bitch them out too much. Go figure. Pussies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Hung</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/22/the-truth-about-viral-and-social-marketing-its-all-about-the-sock-puppets/comment-page-1/#comment-100404</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Hung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 18:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/22/the-truth-about-viral-and-social-marketing-its-all-about-the-sock-puppets/#comment-100404</guid>
		<description>@Jim -- no question that there are many other considerations that are worthwhile thinking of ... including conversation rates (to a landing page, to someone actually doing something -- signing up, purchasing things etc) and actual brand recognition.  Which is something I ranted about in broad terms during the Dove &quot;Real Beauty&quot; campaign, although this is clearly something very different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jim &#8212; no question that there are many other considerations that are worthwhile thinking of &#8230; including conversation rates (to a landing page, to someone actually doing something &#8212; signing up, purchasing things etc) and actual brand recognition.  Which is something I ranted about in broad terms during the Dove &#8220;Real Beauty&#8221; campaign, although this is clearly something very different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Hung</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/22/the-truth-about-viral-and-social-marketing-its-all-about-the-sock-puppets/comment-page-1/#comment-100402</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Hung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 18:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/22/the-truth-about-viral-and-social-marketing-its-all-about-the-sock-puppets/#comment-100402</guid>
		<description>@Darren -- me saying its neither a good or bad thing was said in jest; as a Canadian I find it inherently difficult to criticize ... unless its done in a passively aggressive way, of course (hence my parenthetical &quot;but probably mostly bad&quot;)

Cheers ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Darren &#8212; me saying its neither a good or bad thing was said in jest; as a Canadian I find it inherently difficult to criticize &#8230; unless its done in a passively aggressive way, of course (hence my parenthetical &#8220;but probably mostly bad&#8221;)</p>
<p>Cheers ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Kukral</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/22/the-truth-about-viral-and-social-marketing-its-all-about-the-sock-puppets/comment-page-1/#comment-100374</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Kukral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 16:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/22/the-truth-about-viral-and-social-marketing-its-all-about-the-sock-puppets/#comment-100374</guid>
		<description>The whole thing is stupid because &quot;going viral&quot; is a complete waste of time in the manner they describe.

Going viral like www.willitblend.com is the right way. 

Stuffing hot chicks in a lame videos to get views is just dumb, and views don&#039;t translate into anything. Those studios got ripped off big time.

As I said on my blog Tony, chasing viral is about as dumb as chasing web traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole thing is stupid because &#8220;going viral&#8221; is a complete waste of time in the manner they describe.</p>
<p>Going viral like <a href="http://www.willitblend.com" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/www.willitblend.com');" rel="nofollow">http://www.willitblend.com</a> is the right way. </p>
<p>Stuffing hot chicks in a lame videos to get views is just dumb, and views don&#8217;t translate into anything. Those studios got ripped off big time.</p>
<p>As I said on my blog Tony, chasing viral is about as dumb as chasing web traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
