<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gmail 2.0 Is Nice &#8212; Still No Sorting Function, Though.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/05/gmail-20-is-nice-still-no-sorting-function-though/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/05/gmail-20-is-nice-still-no-sorting-function-though/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Web 2.0, Social Media, Marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deep Jive Interests &#187; When Will Twitter&#8217;s Gmail Import Feature Get Updated?</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/05/gmail-20-is-nice-still-no-sorting-function-though/comment-page-1/#comment-101835</link>
		<dc:creator>Deep Jive Interests &#187; When Will Twitter&#8217;s Gmail Import Feature Get Updated?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 01:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/05/gmail-20-is-nice-still-no-sorting-function-though/#comment-101835</guid>
		<description>[...] Twitter&#8217;s invite-through-Gmail process is actually going to get updated?  I understand that Gmail 2.0 (or whatever they&#8217;re calling it) with its updated contact management has broken things for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Twitter&#8217;s invite-through-Gmail process is actually going to get updated?  I understand that Gmail 2.0 (or whatever they&#8217;re calling it) with its updated contact management has broken things for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Hung</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/05/gmail-20-is-nice-still-no-sorting-function-though/comment-page-1/#comment-91079</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Hung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 18:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/05/gmail-20-is-nice-still-no-sorting-function-though/#comment-91079</guid>
		<description>on the surface, it doesn&#039;t seem like it would be a hard thing to do -- on the other hand, to be able to search by &quot;name&quot;, or &quot;date&quot;, would require another set column of links to denote each column on the actual main gmail page.

Doesn&#039;t seem like a big deal to me, but hey ... what do I know? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>on the surface, it doesn&#8217;t seem like it would be a hard thing to do &#8212; on the other hand, to be able to search by &#8220;name&#8221;, or &#8220;date&#8221;, would require another set column of links to denote each column on the actual main gmail page.</p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t seem like a big deal to me, but hey &#8230; what do I know? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: engtech</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/05/gmail-20-is-nice-still-no-sorting-function-though/comment-page-1/#comment-91078</link>
		<dc:creator>engtech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 18:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/11/05/gmail-20-is-nice-still-no-sorting-function-though/#comment-91078</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve heard mention that searches can be bookmarked, but haven&#039;t gotten that working yet.

You&#039;re correct though that they&#039;re missing sort operators on search results.

I can find everything with an attachment with has:attachment, but I can&#039;t sort them by size.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard mention that searches can be bookmarked, but haven&#8217;t gotten that working yet.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re correct though that they&#8217;re missing sort operators on search results.</p>
<p>I can find everything with an attachment with has:attachment, but I can&#8217;t sort them by size.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

