September 16th, 2007 at 12:46 am

No Bloat in Firefox?  That’s just crazy

In what has to be either the most: a) insulting b) drug-induced c) stupidest d) all of the above … statement of the year on Firefox, Mozilla President (of Europe) in a recent interview with TechCrunch UK has gone on — amongst other things — to deny that there is any bloat in Firefox. In fact, its getting “speedier and speedier”.

Ugh.

I have claimed a great many things to be absurd, ludicrous, and just plain ol’ stupid. Hearing that Firefox *isn’t* bloated, when it regularly eats up 200-300+ megs of RAM for *me* (and I’m not the only one) while using minimal plugins (and other settings) is simply beyond the pale.

What’s more outrageous is that Tristan Nitot goes on to champion the user by using DRM as a foil (and a rather cheap and easy one at that), by going on to say

I don’t think DRM has a future. Treating your customers like thieves is bad business practice. Today the customer is not ‘king’, they are considered thief first.

Mssr. Nitot, you know what else is bad business practice? Treating your customers like puerile idiots.

Firefox has had problems with bloat and memory leak for a long time and its the one thing that successive iterations never seem to address properly. Its almost like Mozilla is saying “well, its your fault for not optimizing Firefox and not having enough RAM — fools.”

I have no idea when Firefox will fix this issue, or if Firefox will get its comeuppance for this ongoing sin. But its just sad when the chiefs at the top won’t even acknowledge this issue, which has been plaguing an otherwise fine product for ages.

5 Responses to “Mozilla Prez Insults Intelligence Of Firefox Users Worldwide, Denies Bloat In Firefox.”

  1. Ryan Coleman :

    Oh, so it’s actually a feature when I click the red “X” in the window and it doesn’t close but rather keeps running/chewing memory in the background. right. gotcha.

  2. Steven Hodson :

    I have tried Firefox since the very first beta version was available. I have installed and tried to use each and every successive version. Throughout all this I have expperienced this non-existent memory problem and I very rarely install *any* pluigns or extensions.

    I still keep installing it and trying it out but it has never yet become my primary browser. If anything Safari will replace IE7 as my primary should that day come.

  3. Tony Hung :

    Steve — glad to know I’m not the only one who isn’t crazy. :)

  4. steve ballmer :

    Good post!

  5. Tony Hung :

    Thanks “Steve”. :)

Leave a Reply.

Please note the comments policy

Sep
16
2007
12:46 am