<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Speaking Of Calming Down &#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/08/09/speaking-of-calming-down/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/08/09/speaking-of-calming-down/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Web 2.0, Social Media, Marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:17:06 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim Savage</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/08/09/speaking-of-calming-down/comment-page-1/#comment-85284</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Savage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 07:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/08/09/speaking-of-calming-down/#comment-85284</guid>
		<description>Litigation is not an issue. Under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1995 (the part that WASN&#039;T thrown out by the Supreme Court), internet companies are immune from liability for damage (with the exception of copyright violations) for content posted on their sites that is created by a third party. So Google has nothing to worry about from its commentators, which is why I&#039;m certain that it&#039;s not going to worry too much about moderating them. If anything, it&#039;s verification of identity (assuming that can be done effectively) would make it easier for an injured party to sue the poster directly, thus reducing their incentive to drag Google into a court case that they&#039;re going to lose anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Litigation is not an issue. Under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1995 (the part that WASN&#8217;T thrown out by the Supreme Court), internet companies are immune from liability for damage (with the exception of copyright violations) for content posted on their sites that is created by a third party. So Google has nothing to worry about from its commentators, which is why I&#8217;m certain that it&#8217;s not going to worry too much about moderating them. If anything, it&#8217;s verification of identity (assuming that can be done effectively) would make it easier for an injured party to sue the poster directly, thus reducing their incentive to drag Google into a court case that they&#8217;re going to lose anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
