<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FM Conspiracy Redux: Its All About Disclosure.  Maybe.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/08/03/fm-conspiracy-redux-its-all-about-disclosure-maybe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/08/03/fm-conspiracy-redux-its-all-about-disclosure-maybe/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Web 2.0, Social Media, Marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:17:06 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/08/03/fm-conspiracy-redux-its-all-about-disclosure-maybe/comment-page-1/#comment-59500</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 12:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/08/03/fm-conspiracy-redux-its-all-about-disclosure-maybe/#comment-59500</guid>
		<description>I think Allen may have been hit on the head by one of those chestnuts from the disclosure tree he&#039;s been shaking. Using the same ad network service isn&#039;t the same thing as being part of the same blog network. I don&#039;t get the fuss being made. It&#039;s not like you have to declare a relationship with every blog you mention or link to just because you both use Feeburner&#039;s ad service or Adwords for that matter.

If an FM severed blog links to another FM served blog, there&#039;s nothing in it for them, except the usual hope of a link back -- at some point -- in return. This applies regardless of the FM relationship.

I don&#039;t get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Allen may have been hit on the head by one of those chestnuts from the disclosure tree he&#8217;s been shaking. Using the same ad network service isn&#8217;t the same thing as being part of the same blog network. I don&#8217;t get the fuss being made. It&#8217;s not like you have to declare a relationship with every blog you mention or link to just because you both use Feeburner&#8217;s ad service or Adwords for that matter.</p>
<p>If an FM severed blog links to another FM served blog, there&#8217;s nothing in it for them, except the usual hope of a link back &#8212; at some point &#8212; in return. This applies regardless of the FM relationship.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen Stern</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/08/03/fm-conspiracy-redux-its-all-about-disclosure-maybe/comment-page-1/#comment-59374</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen Stern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 01:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/08/03/fm-conspiracy-redux-its-all-about-disclosure-maybe/#comment-59374</guid>
		<description>LOL Tony - I am not keeping an eye on things. Just pointing out things I notice along the road that are worthy of discussion.

Innovation and testing new ideas is good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL Tony &#8211; I am not keeping an eye on things. Just pointing out things I notice along the road that are worthy of discussion.</p>
<p>Innovation and testing new ideas is good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
