<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jakob Nielson &#8212; With The Humblest Respect?  You Don&#8217;t Understand Blogging, Sir.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/07/10/jakob-nielson-with-the-humblest-respect-you-dont-understand-blogging-sir/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/07/10/jakob-nielson-with-the-humblest-respect-you-dont-understand-blogging-sir/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Web 2.0, Social Media, Marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 06:10:44 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jay Ferrari</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/07/10/jakob-nielson-with-the-humblest-respect-you-dont-understand-blogging-sir/comment-page-1/#comment-54833</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Ferrari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 17:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/07/10/jakob-nielson-with-the-humblest-respect-you-dont-understand-blogging-sir/#comment-54833</guid>
		<description>Solid points Tony. Seems like Jakob is trying to rationalize the shift, and apply is set thinking to the new approach. A classic case of holding on too tight. Some of his counsel applies no matter what you&#039;re writing (blogs, billboards, or bumperstickers), but old boy needs to lighten up.

I said as much in a recent post on our blog not too long ago:
http://inspireaction.mindandmedia.com/index.php/2007/07/10/a-blog-post-even-jakob-nielsen-could-love/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Solid points Tony. Seems like Jakob is trying to rationalize the shift, and apply is set thinking to the new approach. A classic case of holding on too tight. Some of his counsel applies no matter what you&#8217;re writing (blogs, billboards, or bumperstickers), but old boy needs to lighten up.</p>
<p>I said as much in a recent post on our blog not too long ago:<br />
<a href="http://inspireaction.mindandmedia.com/index.php/2007/07/10/a-blog-post-even-jakob-nielsen-could-love/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/inspireaction.mindandmedia.com');" rel="nofollow">http://inspireaction.mindandmedia.com/index.php/2007/07/10/a-blog-post-even-jakob-nielsen-could-love/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Write Blog Posts Not Articles : Instigator Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/07/10/jakob-nielson-with-the-humblest-respect-you-dont-understand-blogging-sir/comment-page-1/#comment-54809</link>
		<dc:creator>Write Blog Posts Not Articles : Instigator Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 15:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/07/10/jakob-nielson-with-the-humblest-respect-you-dont-understand-blogging-sir/#comment-54809</guid>
		<description>[...] Tony Hung is also right when he says that one or two off-quality posts won&#8217;t kill a blog, as Nielsen [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tony Hung is also right when he says that one or two off-quality posts won&#8217;t kill a blog, as Nielsen [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael A. Stelzner</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/07/10/jakob-nielson-with-the-humblest-respect-you-dont-understand-blogging-sir/comment-page-1/#comment-54669</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael A. Stelzner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 03:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/07/10/jakob-nielson-with-the-humblest-respect-you-dont-understand-blogging-sir/#comment-54669</guid>
		<description>While I would have loved it if Nielsen wrote about white papers in his don&#039;t blog post, he did not.

See the original post here: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/articles-not-blogs.html

White papers are my specialty, and we was talking about articles.

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I would have loved it if Nielsen wrote about white papers in his don&#8217;t blog post, he did not.</p>
<p>See the original post here: <a href="http://www.useit.com/alertbox/articles-not-blogs.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/www.useit.com');" rel="nofollow">http://www.useit.com/alertbox/articles-not-blogs.html</a></p>
<p>White papers are my specialty, and we was talking about articles.</p>
<p>:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/07/10/jakob-nielson-with-the-humblest-respect-you-dont-understand-blogging-sir/comment-page-1/#comment-54651</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 01:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/07/10/jakob-nielson-with-the-humblest-respect-you-dont-understand-blogging-sir/#comment-54651</guid>
		<description>I agree and I DON&#039;T get his high level point. 

I don&#039;t blog about what everyone else is writing about. At least 75% of my content is fresh and new: opinion pieces, how-to pieces, days in my life pieces, what I&#039;m thinking about pieces.

I write for a living -- and get paid well for it. I blog for pleasure, to journalize my life, and to help promote my paid writing work. I have a lot of respect for Nielsen. I&#039;ve quoted him in a book I wrote about building Web sites and in blog posts. But I agree with you: he doesn&#039;t quite understand what blogging is all about.

Or maybe he&#039;s just looking at the wrong blogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree and I DON&#8217;T get his high level point. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t blog about what everyone else is writing about. At least 75% of my content is fresh and new: opinion pieces, how-to pieces, days in my life pieces, what I&#8217;m thinking about pieces.</p>
<p>I write for a living &#8212; and get paid well for it. I blog for pleasure, to journalize my life, and to help promote my paid writing work. I have a lot of respect for Nielsen. I&#8217;ve quoted him in a book I wrote about building Web sites and in blog posts. But I agree with you: he doesn&#8217;t quite understand what blogging is all about.</p>
<p>Or maybe he&#8217;s just looking at the wrong blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Kukral</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/07/10/jakob-nielson-with-the-humblest-respect-you-dont-understand-blogging-sir/comment-page-1/#comment-53490</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Kukral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 20:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/07/10/jakob-nielson-with-the-humblest-respect-you-dont-understand-blogging-sir/#comment-53490</guid>
		<description>Tony, I agree, although I get his &quot;high-level&quot; point.

But yes, I agree with you.

http://www.jimkukral.com/holy-crap-i-agree-with-jakob-nielsen/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony, I agree, although I get his &#8220;high-level&#8221; point.</p>
<p>But yes, I agree with you.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jimkukral.com/holy-crap-i-agree-with-jakob-nielsen/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/www.jimkukral.com');" rel="nofollow">http://www.jimkukral.com/holy-crap-i-agree-with-jakob-nielsen/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Hung</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/07/10/jakob-nielson-with-the-humblest-respect-you-dont-understand-blogging-sir/comment-page-1/#comment-52300</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Hung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 04:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/07/10/jakob-nielson-with-the-humblest-respect-you-dont-understand-blogging-sir/#comment-52300</guid>
		<description>Thanks Jan ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jan ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/07/10/jakob-nielson-with-the-humblest-respect-you-dont-understand-blogging-sir/comment-page-1/#comment-52198</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 20:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/07/10/jakob-nielson-with-the-humblest-respect-you-dont-understand-blogging-sir/#comment-52198</guid>
		<description>Please Tony, get the mans name right :-) His name is Jakob Nielsen. Not &quot;Jakbo&quot; not &quot;Nielson&quot; or any other variation. 

This name thing threw me from concentrating on your (I am sure excellent) points so I will have to read this again... Maybe I should read what Jakob Nielsen said first though so I can see what you are getting so worked up about :-) 

As far as I know was his usability tips always somewhat controversial as well as he is a hardliner or purist or whatever you would call it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please Tony, get the mans name right :-) His name is Jakob Nielsen. Not &#8220;Jakbo&#8221; not &#8220;Nielson&#8221; or any other variation. </p>
<p>This name thing threw me from concentrating on your (I am sure excellent) points so I will have to read this again&#8230; Maybe I should read what Jakob Nielsen said first though so I can see what you are getting so worked up about :-) </p>
<p>As far as I know was his usability tips always somewhat controversial as well as he is a hardliner or purist or whatever you would call it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
