So I’ve had a few days to mull over Pownce. And you can add my review to the giant stack of reviews you’ve probably read, some of which have been positive and others not so much. Mine you can add to the “not so much” pile.
So, what is Pownce?
Pownce is an web-based instant messaging system that can be used ex-browser if you download the Adobe Integrated Runtime. Oh. Its wrapped up in a pretty slick package, and you can send group messages. That’s pretty much it.
It shouldn’t be confused with services like Twitter, which are really continuous partial attention services, or something that I’ve described as ambient broadcasting.
The reason is because unlike Twitter, or even the “status” system that’s available through Facebook, there is yet to be an easy way to update your status, or send messages (about your status) through a mobile device. You can only message when you’re attached to the ‘net through a PC. This difference cannot be understated because it means that when you’re at an event — literally, an event — you can broadcast information live to your friends. You can tell them where you are, what you’re doing, what you’re thinking, and where you want to meet. Twitter, after all, exploded after SXSW, where people were Twittering away about where they were during the festival — and in a peculiar voyeuristic way, you could almost “be” there too if you were observing the tweets.
The other, smaller, difference is that there is no character limit to the messages. Twitter, for example, has a 140 character limit. You might not think this is such a big thing (pun not intended), but in fact, limiting the number of characters *forces* you to create terse and important messages. It also meshes nicely with being able to, in fact, create messages, *anywhere* you are, as mobile Twittering (or now, Twittergramming) is possible.
Both of these limitations make Pownce merely, for the most part, a fancy web based instant messaging system. And if you think of it that way, its one that’s crippled in one vital respect, in that its not able to integrate with other instant messaging networks.
Sure, it might be so slick it might get you to change your mind about which instant messaging system you might use. But why should you stick with *one* instant messaging system when you can plug into *all* of them at once? That way you don’t need to port over your entire network, which is really the killer *anything* of any networked application.
Heck, that’s almost like the *other* fancy web-based instant messaging system that I *already* use. Maybe you’ve heard of it? Its called Meebo, and it works pretty damn well.
Now, in all fairness Pownce will probably continue to evolve beyond just being able to doing what it is just doing. It could add a mobile component, and that would dramatically change things. It could also add the “plug into all networks” thing, as well.
But will it? Or will it go in another direction entirely? Time, as they say, will tell.


July 9th, 2007 at 11:24 pm | Permalink
I think that Pownce has the ability to be as popular as Twitter in the same ways. However until you can update via IM or Mobile Phone, it just won’t happen.
Also, it seems that Pownce was not meant to be a Twitter-like application. I will continue to utilize both services because I am interested to see where Pownce is going to go.
July 9th, 2007 at 11:40 pm | Permalink
Tony, I totally agree. I’d done a comparison a few days ago, but you summed it up a bit better. The user-base (Friends) is the killer-feature of Twitter at this moment.
July 10th, 2007 at 4:30 am | Permalink
[…] I’m not with it when it comes new services like Pownce and Twitter, so it’s nice to see Tony Hung (Deep Jive Interests) talk about these in a little more […]
July 10th, 2007 at 3:18 pm | Permalink
[…] Deep Jive Interests » Pownce Is Not Twitter, Nor Is It As Important As Twitter. I happen to agree with Tony Hung on this - Pownce is a slick new service, but it doesn’t do what Twitter does. By the way, anyone want a Pownce invite? Email me directly - its somewhere on my blog. (tags: twitter web-services social-networking software) […]
July 10th, 2007 at 9:00 pm | Permalink
Yeah, to me the beauty of Twitter is its simplicity and mobility. I don’t even use it on a mobile device, but the ability to receive updates on live events and from people on the go is great.
Pownce might be prettier and have some advanced features, but I dig the stripped down feel of twitter, and Tony’s right on the money in terms of the 140 character limitation. It “allows” you to throw short bursts of thought to a group of friends, which is fun and can be cathartic in building up to a full fledged blog post!
Another side of it is Twitter’s open API. Twittervision and Twittergrams and the community of sites and developers that sprang up around the Twitter service continues to be a huge part of its appeal. (Does Pownce have an open API?)
July 20th, 2007 at 10:05 am | Permalink
[…] Pownce Is Not Twitter, Nor Is It As Important As Twitter. An interesting comparison of Pownce and Twitter. On Deep Jive Interests. (tags: twitter powce networking) […]
July 27th, 2007 at 12:29 am | Permalink
[…] let’s be fair. I like the idea behind twitter. I kind of get how its different and how its important and how no one is really doing what its doing, to the extent what its doing — Leo Laporte […]