<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Live at Mesh 07 @ 1005 &#8212; Arrington Keynote Part 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/05/30/live-at-mesh-07-1005-arrington-keynote-part-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/05/30/live-at-mesh-07-1005-arrington-keynote-part-3/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Web 2.0, Social Media, Marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Truth vs. traffic: An age-old battle - - mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/05/30/live-at-mesh-07-1005-arrington-keynote-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-131320</link>
		<dc:creator>Truth vs. traffic: An age-old battle - - mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 20:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/05/30/live-at-mesh-07-1005-arrington-keynote-part-3/#comment-131320</guid>
		<description>[...] to jump into print with something quickly even if he hasn&#8217;t pinned it down 100 per cent? He admitted that it does (although he also made the point that trust must be gained over time, and can be easily [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to jump into print with something quickly even if he hasn&#8217;t pinned it down 100 per cent? He admitted that it does (although he also made the point that trust must be gained over time, and can be easily [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deep Jive Interests &#187; Blog Marketing Rule #42: He Who Is The Most Controversial Wins (Bigger Bloggers Are Best)</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/05/30/live-at-mesh-07-1005-arrington-keynote-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-131283</link>
		<dc:creator>Deep Jive Interests &#187; Blog Marketing Rule #42: He Who Is The Most Controversial Wins (Bigger Bloggers Are Best)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/05/30/live-at-mesh-07-1005-arrington-keynote-part-3/#comment-131283</guid>
		<description>[...] yes, its important to throw out the usual biscuit about blogger integrity, and so on, and so on.  But the takeaway message is clearly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] yes, its important to throw out the usual biscuit about blogger integrity, and so on, and so on.  But the takeaway message is clearly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3+1 Things Blogger&#8217;s Should Never Ever Do.</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/05/30/live-at-mesh-07-1005-arrington-keynote-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-51318</link>
		<dc:creator>3+1 Things Blogger&#8217;s Should Never Ever Do.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 16:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/05/30/live-at-mesh-07-1005-arrington-keynote-part-3/#comment-51318</guid>
		<description>[...] Bloggers like to echo what other bloggers say. In fact I recently noticed quite a few popular tech blog out there seem to be re-posting news that&#8217;s already out there, all they do is rewrite the content and give a link back. While I am not against this, but do such people take the trouble to research and verify the facts. In fact a number of so called A-list Blogs are guilty of this example TechCrunch, GigaOM, Scoble (Lately I been getting a bit annoyed with his blog posts, it look more like a 10 year old kids blog) etc. here&#8217;s what Mike Arrington said a while back. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bloggers like to echo what other bloggers say. In fact I recently noticed quite a few popular tech blog out there seem to be re-posting news that&#8217;s already out there, all they do is rewrite the content and give a link back. While I am not against this, but do such people take the trouble to research and verify the facts. In fact a number of so called A-list Blogs are guilty of this example TechCrunch, GigaOM, Scoble (Lately I been getting a bit annoyed with his blog posts, it look more like a 10 year old kids blog) etc. here&#8217;s what Mike Arrington said a while back. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

