May 15th, 2007 at 6:07 pm

Well, some observations from the ever-observant Marshall Kirkpatrick, filtering through Mike Arrington and a few others, that MySpace News is teh dead. Or, something close to it. Crickets chirping, the slow silent death of unusage and all that rot.

This is absolutely no surprise.

I think part of the blame has to do with its poor user interface, and its premise as a half-baked social news - aggregating tool where users could only vote on news that was gathered/scraped/pre-approved, and not, for example, submit news.

I think the other part of the blame is just the users.

MySpace News, just like its upcoming video channels, are all brand extensions of a sort. Except that they don’t really make much sense to begin with, in so far as that MySpace, to many people who use it, doens’t “mean” News.

Yeah, I “get” that MySpace is “trying” something new. All that social media stuff — them kids are into it these days, right?

Except that, and this is entirely hypothetical and conjecture, I don’t think that MySpacers are the same kind of people who actively *use* social news.

I said it once a few weeks ago when it debuted, I still stand by it. The success of social news sites like Digg, Reddit and Netscape is that they were sure about their identity and their use — and people come *to* those sites for those reasons. Digg is the biggest, and I suspect, will remain the biggest, because it really had a significant first-mover advantage into that type of space.

MySpace is trying to graft a social news tool onto an existing social news site.

While I’m sure that MySpace New’s dismal failure has many different factors (such as, but not limited to, “where does a failure to promote MySpace News on MySpace” play into things), I do wonder about how many MySpacers know about, or even care about, the existence or usage of social news?

After all, the thought that MySpace could create a juggernaut in social news is only valid if, and only if, their population is predisposed to being keen to use it *anyway*.

I don’t have the data — but I suspect that they aren’t.

And if they aren’t, then no amount of fancifying the UI, or improving the mechanics, will really help it become anything but a third tier Digg clone.

You know — the kind that no one uses.

3 Responses to “MySpace News Not A Juggernaut? Its The Users, Silly.”

  1. Stan Schroeder :

    It’s not directly related to MySpace News, which is a mess, but I’m beginning to think that this space is closed/drained/dead/gone. I’ve seen a lot of Read Submit Vote Comment style startups and none of them managed to amount to anything.

  2. Tony Hung :

    There’s an appealing argument to that — its not an entirely zero sum game, but I think for certain niches, geek ones in particular, you’d have to take users away from established social news sites for new ones to be successful.

    And for others, people who enjoy those niches are probably not the kind of people who would enjoy RSVC type of environment anyway. Can you imagine a social RSVC site on knitting, for example, being successful?

    I think that may be my own biases as well, but I wonder if I’m very far off.

    Cheers
    t @ dji

  3. Community is the hard part » mathewingram.com/work :

    [...] isn’t MySpace News taking off? Because as Tony Hung suggests, it either isn’t appealing to the community or it isn’t making it easy for them to use [...]

Leave a Reply.

Please note the comments policy

May
15
2007
6:07 pm