<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Second Law of Ambient Broadcasting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/04/17/the-second-law-of-ambient-broadcasting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/04/17/the-second-law-of-ambient-broadcasting/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Web 2.0, Social Media, Marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:25:56 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Yang-May</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/04/17/the-second-law-of-ambient-broadcasting/comment-page-1/#comment-30044</link>
		<dc:creator>Yang-May</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/04/17/the-second-law-of-ambient-broadcasting/#comment-30044</guid>
		<description>The Steve Rubel is a good object lesson in managing one&#039;s enthusiasm - he was twittering so much and so excitedbly before the PC magazine debacle that even his greatest fans were complaining that he should give it a rest as they were getting tired of getting so many of his tweets. He did calm down and I&#039;ve found his more selective tweeting useful and interesting. The trouble with something like Twitter is that it&#039;s so easy and quick - as you point out - and it&#039;s so easy to bash something out without thinking. And therein lies the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Steve Rubel is a good object lesson in managing one&#8217;s enthusiasm &#8211; he was twittering so much and so excitedbly before the PC magazine debacle that even his greatest fans were complaining that he should give it a rest as they were getting tired of getting so many of his tweets. He did calm down and I&#8217;ve found his more selective tweeting useful and interesting. The trouble with something like Twitter is that it&#8217;s so easy and quick &#8211; as you point out &#8211; and it&#8217;s so easy to bash something out without thinking. And therein lies the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/04/17/the-second-law-of-ambient-broadcasting/comment-page-1/#comment-29682</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 03:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/04/17/the-second-law-of-ambient-broadcasting/#comment-29682</guid>
		<description>Hey Allen,

Thanks for the kind words -- glad you found some food for thought over here ... its all I&#039;m trying to do. ;)

Cheers
t @ dji</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Allen,</p>
<p>Thanks for the kind words &#8212; glad you found some food for thought over here &#8230; its all I&#8217;m trying to do. ;)</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
t @ dji</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen Stern</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/04/17/the-second-law-of-ambient-broadcasting/comment-page-1/#comment-29635</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen Stern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 01:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/04/17/the-second-law-of-ambient-broadcasting/#comment-29635</guid>
		<description>Tony - I just gave you some link love on my post (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.centernetworks.com/a-very-serious-topic-communication&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.centernetworks.com/a-very-serious-topic-communication&lt;/a&gt;). Your writeup is excellent (as always). We seem to be on similar paths in our thoughts regarding communications.

Thanks for the good read!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony &#8211; I just gave you some link love on my post (<a href="http://www.centernetworks.com/a-very-serious-topic-communication" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/www.centernetworks.com');" rel="nofollow">http://www.centernetworks.com/a-very-serious-topic-communication</a>). Your writeup is excellent (as always). We seem to be on similar paths in our thoughts regarding communications.</p>
<p>Thanks for the good read!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/04/17/the-second-law-of-ambient-broadcasting/comment-page-1/#comment-29585</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 21:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/04/17/the-second-law-of-ambient-broadcasting/#comment-29585</guid>
		<description>Patricia,

I will say this for Steve.  When he wants to, the man can really put together a good blog post.  Check out his series on using Gmail as a hub for all of your communications.  Really good stuff.

His abilities as a PR man?  I don&#039;t know.  But what I do know is that from the lens of a fellow blogger looking *in* on what he does, I also agree -- he always seems to be apologizing for what he&#039;s done, or *not* done (in the case of Edelman&#039;s Walmart fiasco).

Which, ironically, seems like bad PR. :P

Cheers
t @ dji</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patricia,</p>
<p>I will say this for Steve.  When he wants to, the man can really put together a good blog post.  Check out his series on using Gmail as a hub for all of your communications.  Really good stuff.</p>
<p>His abilities as a PR man?  I don&#8217;t know.  But what I do know is that from the lens of a fellow blogger looking *in* on what he does, I also agree &#8212; he always seems to be apologizing for what he&#8217;s done, or *not* done (in the case of Edelman&#8217;s Walmart fiasco).</p>
<p>Which, ironically, seems like bad PR. :P</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
t @ dji</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/04/17/the-second-law-of-ambient-broadcasting/comment-page-1/#comment-29577</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 21:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/04/17/the-second-law-of-ambient-broadcasting/#comment-29577</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll admit -- I&#039;ve never had much use for Steve Rubel. And it seems I only hear about Edelman when they&#039;re apologizing for something (Wal-Mart Across America, anyone?). His mea culpa letter holds no water. Rubel can join Arrington, Calcanis, Scoble and their pompous loudmouth brethren in the category of people who read, fight with, comment upon and bring media attention to each other more than the rest of us care about all of them put together. For someone who&#039;s spent his career in PR, Rubel seems to act/speak before thinking frighteningly often.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll admit &#8212; I&#8217;ve never had much use for Steve Rubel. And it seems I only hear about Edelman when they&#8217;re apologizing for something (Wal-Mart Across America, anyone?). His mea culpa letter holds no water. Rubel can join Arrington, Calcanis, Scoble and their pompous loudmouth brethren in the category of people who read, fight with, comment upon and bring media attention to each other more than the rest of us care about all of them put together. For someone who&#8217;s spent his career in PR, Rubel seems to act/speak before thinking frighteningly often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
