<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Are We *Still* Confusing &#8220;Blogging Code of Conduct&#8221; With &#8220;Having a Comments Policy&#8221;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/04/09/why-are-we-still-confusing-blogging-code-of-conduct-with-having-a-comments-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/04/09/why-are-we-still-confusing-blogging-code-of-conduct-with-having-a-comments-policy/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Web 2.0, Social Media, Marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:17:06 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bootstrapper &#187; Delegating Tasks: 15 Key Roles for a Revenue-Producing Website</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/04/09/why-are-we-still-confusing-blogging-code-of-conduct-with-having-a-comments-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-62070</link>
		<dc:creator>Bootstrapper &#187; Delegating Tasks: 15 Key Roles for a Revenue-Producing Website</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 17:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/04/09/why-are-we-still-confusing-blogging-code-of-conduct-with-having-a-comments-policy/#comment-62070</guid>
		<description>[...] Have a comment policy, display it clearly, and stick to it. If your weblog uses WordPress, use the Comment-Policy plugin. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Have a comment policy, display it clearly, and stick to it. If your weblog uses WordPress, use the Comment-Policy plugin. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deep Jive Interests &#187; When Crowds Get Out Of Control -- A Case for Stronger Digg Censorship?</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/04/09/why-are-we-still-confusing-blogging-code-of-conduct-with-having-a-comments-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-47638</link>
		<dc:creator>Deep Jive Interests &#187; When Crowds Get Out Of Control -- A Case for Stronger Digg Censorship?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/04/09/why-are-we-still-confusing-blogging-code-of-conduct-with-having-a-comments-policy/#comment-47638</guid>
		<description>[...] might remember Kathy Sierra&#8217;s difficulties after a bunch of well known bloggers allowed comments to run rampa... &#8212; thereby allowing some nasty sentiments to ferment, eventually culminating in a few [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] might remember Kathy Sierra&#8217;s difficulties after a bunch of well known bloggers allowed comments to run rampa&#8230; &#8212; thereby allowing some nasty sentiments to ferment, eventually culminating in a few [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How To Get A Code of Conduct Widely Adopted : The Blog Herald</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/04/09/why-are-we-still-confusing-blogging-code-of-conduct-with-having-a-comments-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-37458</link>
		<dc:creator>How To Get A Code of Conduct Widely Adopted : The Blog Herald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 02:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/04/09/why-are-we-still-confusing-blogging-code-of-conduct-with-having-a-comments-policy/#comment-37458</guid>
		<description>[...] has reared its ugly head once again. Its not new. I blogged about it about a week ago, wondering, like today, whether or not it had its use in a self-regulating environment, and more to the point, whether or [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has reared its ugly head once again. Its not new. I blogged about it about a week ago, wondering, like today, whether or not it had its use in a self-regulating environment, and more to the point, whether or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: www.mathematics.mil</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/04/09/why-are-we-still-confusing-blogging-code-of-conduct-with-having-a-comments-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-27892</link>
		<dc:creator>www.mathematics.mil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 09:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/04/09/why-are-we-still-confusing-blogging-code-of-conduct-with-having-a-comments-policy/#comment-27892</guid>
		<description>2007 04:10
Re: Tim O&#039;Reilly proposes &quot;Blogger Code of Conduct&quot; WarRites
by Someone on 2007-04-12 05:00:19

Link http_//_radar_oreilly_com/archives/2007/04/draft_bloggers_1_html- Entailment -:=

www_mathematics_mil [04_12_07 01:43 AM]

&quot;Blogging Code of Conduct&quot; equals &quot;Jew or not Jew&quot;
[It&#039;s all disgusting jewish-zionistic propaganda.]
Examples:
www_mathematics_mil Apr 11th, 2007 - 22:23:17

&#039;Zooming in on Darfur: Google teams up with _Holocaust Museum_&#039;(4/11/2007):
Reference _Holocaust Museums_: &#039;Usama bin Laden Says Israeli Regime is Behind the 9-11 Attacks KABUL, Afghanistan (Ummat): Prominent Arab mojahed (freedom fighter) Usama bin Laden or the Al-Qaida group has nothing to do with the 11 September attacks on the Bush Administration, according to an Usama bin Laden interview with Ummat, the Karachi-based Pakistani daily newspaper. In his interview, Usama bin Laden pointed out that the Israeli regime is behind the 9-11 attacks&#039;[Bin Laden: AUTHENTIC INTERVIEW by Carol A. Valentine
Curator, Waco Holocaust Electronic Museum, October, 2001 ].

Piper Apr 11th, 2007 - 23:43:33

This is not an apolitical move. Darfur is located on top of some large oil reserves that a Chinese oil company currently has dibs on. Sudan geography alone makes it an important strategic point. (it&#039;s connection to the read sea, important rivers, relation to Mideast and Africa etc.) The US government wants the ability to create a pretense to get its hands in Darfur, just as it did in Iraq. The demonstration against the genocide last year included speakers from congress and the state department. The amount of people killed is really quite smaller than those killed in Iraq. (about 200,000 vs. 655,000-900,000 deaths) Genocide has only been an issue for our government when money and power are at stake. The Sudanese government is supporting the massacres in order to push rebels and the communities that support them off the oil rich land. Given our government&#039;s record, there&#039;s no reason to think this would stop if they stepped in to get the oil themselves. Most likely the violence would increase because the political pressure to stop the killing would disapear. That a holocaust museum is involved isn&#039;t suprising. Most holocaust institutions (not to mention Jewish institutions) have been taken over by a leadership that actively collaborates with American imperialism. Instead of drawing real lessons from the holocaust that could prevent another one (such as the need for a working class movement, the threat a collapsing capitalist system poses, and the need Jews have to align ourselves with workers and oppressed nationalities (including and especially Palestinians) in order to build a new world etc.) Holocaust rememberance has been primarily used to bolster the image of American imperialism and shield it&#039;s junior parters in the Israeli government from attack. (Just one instance: The entire justification for war in Iraq was basically: Saddam=Hitler) This Darfur propaganda is only the latest installment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2007 04:10<br />
Re: Tim O&#8217;Reilly proposes &#8220;Blogger Code of Conduct&#8221; WarRites<br />
by Someone on 2007-04-12 05:00:19</p>
<p>Link http_//_radar_oreilly_com/archives/2007/04/draft_bloggers_1_html- Entailment -:=</p>
<p>www_mathematics_mil [04_12_07 01:43 AM]</p>
<p>&#8220;Blogging Code of Conduct&#8221; equals &#8220;Jew or not Jew&#8221;<br />
[It's all disgusting jewish-zionistic propaganda.]<br />
Examples:<br />
www_mathematics_mil Apr 11th, 2007 &#8211; 22:23:17</p>
<p>&#8216;Zooming in on Darfur: Google teams up with _Holocaust Museum_&#8217;(4/11/2007):<br />
Reference _Holocaust Museums_: &#8216;Usama bin Laden Says Israeli Regime is Behind the 9-11 Attacks KABUL, Afghanistan (Ummat): Prominent Arab mojahed (freedom fighter) Usama bin Laden or the Al-Qaida group has nothing to do with the 11 September attacks on the Bush Administration, according to an Usama bin Laden interview with Ummat, the Karachi-based Pakistani daily newspaper. In his interview, Usama bin Laden pointed out that the Israeli regime is behind the 9-11 attacks&#8217;[Bin Laden: AUTHENTIC INTERVIEW by Carol A. Valentine<br />
Curator, Waco Holocaust Electronic Museum, October, 2001 ].</p>
<p>Piper Apr 11th, 2007 &#8211; 23:43:33</p>
<p>This is not an apolitical move. Darfur is located on top of some large oil reserves that a Chinese oil company currently has dibs on. Sudan geography alone makes it an important strategic point. (it&#8217;s connection to the read sea, important rivers, relation to Mideast and Africa etc.) The US government wants the ability to create a pretense to get its hands in Darfur, just as it did in Iraq. The demonstration against the genocide last year included speakers from congress and the state department. The amount of people killed is really quite smaller than those killed in Iraq. (about 200,000 vs. 655,000-900,000 deaths) Genocide has only been an issue for our government when money and power are at stake. The Sudanese government is supporting the massacres in order to push rebels and the communities that support them off the oil rich land. Given our government&#8217;s record, there&#8217;s no reason to think this would stop if they stepped in to get the oil themselves. Most likely the violence would increase because the political pressure to stop the killing would disapear. That a holocaust museum is involved isn&#8217;t suprising. Most holocaust institutions (not to mention Jewish institutions) have been taken over by a leadership that actively collaborates with American imperialism. Instead of drawing real lessons from the holocaust that could prevent another one (such as the need for a working class movement, the threat a collapsing capitalist system poses, and the need Jews have to align ourselves with workers and oppressed nationalities (including and especially Palestinians) in order to build a new world etc.) Holocaust rememberance has been primarily used to bolster the image of American imperialism and shield it&#8217;s junior parters in the Israeli government from attack. (Just one instance: The entire justification for war in Iraq was basically: Saddam=Hitler) This Darfur propaganda is only the latest installment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American Pundit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More on the Bloggers&#8217; Code of Conduct</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/04/09/why-are-we-still-confusing-blogging-code-of-conduct-with-having-a-comments-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-27787</link>
		<dc:creator>American Pundit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More on the Bloggers&#8217; Code of Conduct</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 01:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/04/09/why-are-we-still-confusing-blogging-code-of-conduct-with-having-a-comments-policy/#comment-27787</guid>
		<description>[...] Tony Hung also makes the important point:  The people who were responsible for the attacks weren’t bloggers. Or rather, we’ll never know if theyw were bloggers. What we do know as that were anonymous cowards, trolling behind fake email addresses, hurling their vindictives. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tony Hung also makes the important point:  The people who were responsible for the attacks weren’t bloggers. Or rather, we’ll never know if theyw were bloggers. What we do know as that were anonymous cowards, trolling behind fake email addresses, hurling their vindictives. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deep Jive Interests &#187; *Does* Civility Matter?</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/04/09/why-are-we-still-confusing-blogging-code-of-conduct-with-having-a-comments-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-27651</link>
		<dc:creator>Deep Jive Interests &#187; *Does* Civility Matter?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/04/09/why-are-we-still-confusing-blogging-code-of-conduct-with-having-a-comments-policy/#comment-27651</guid>
		<description>[...] as I wrote about initially, were never the problem.  Or, if they are, they&#8217;ll never identify themselves behind the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as I wrote about initially, were never the problem.  Or, if they are, they&#8217;ll never identify themselves behind the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bloggers Code of Conduct, A Personal Thing? &#187; SELaplana</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/04/09/why-are-we-still-confusing-blogging-code-of-conduct-with-having-a-comments-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-27235</link>
		<dc:creator>Bloggers Code of Conduct, A Personal Thing? &#187; SELaplana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 08:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/04/09/why-are-we-still-confusing-blogging-code-of-conduct-with-having-a-comments-policy/#comment-27235</guid>
		<description>[...] on the other hand, top western bloggers (Mike Arrington, Dave Taylor, Tony Hung , Jeff Jarvis, Marketing Pilgrim, Ryan Sholin, Mathey Ingram and others) call it a dumb thing, for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on the other hand, top western bloggers (Mike Arrington, Dave Taylor, Tony Hung , Jeff Jarvis, Marketing Pilgrim, Ryan Sholin, Mathey Ingram and others) call it a dumb thing, for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
