<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Print Media: Not Dead, But Not Quite Alive &#8230; Sort of A Living Death</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/03/28/print-media-not-dead-but-not-quite-alive-sort-of-a-living-death/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/03/28/print-media-not-dead-but-not-quite-alive-sort-of-a-living-death/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Web 2.0, Social Media, Marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lungani</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/03/28/print-media-not-dead-but-not-quite-alive-sort-of-a-living-death/comment-page-1/#comment-228729</link>
		<dc:creator>lungani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 17:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/03/28/print-media-not-dead-but-not-quite-alive-sort-of-a-living-death/#comment-228729</guid>
		<description>junk information</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>junk information</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cell Phone Reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/03/28/print-media-not-dead-but-not-quite-alive-sort-of-a-living-death/comment-page-1/#comment-70808</link>
		<dc:creator>Cell Phone Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 21:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/03/28/print-media-not-dead-but-not-quite-alive-sort-of-a-living-death/#comment-70808</guid>
		<description>I agree with you that the print media is going to have to change for die. A lot of them are SLOWLY going online...but not quick enough to be monopolies of the Internet. It&#039;s refreshing to see that the little guys can compete with the mega-companies online.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you that the print media is going to have to change for die. A lot of them are SLOWLY going online&#8230;but not quick enough to be monopolies of the Internet. It&#8217;s refreshing to see that the little guys can compete with the mega-companies online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jhay</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/03/28/print-media-not-dead-but-not-quite-alive-sort-of-a-living-death/comment-page-1/#comment-26008</link>
		<dc:creator>jhay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 03:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/03/28/print-media-not-dead-but-not-quite-alive-sort-of-a-living-death/#comment-26008</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s the old refusing to give to the new. Change has never been easy, has anyone given birth to a child without a single drop of blood or the faintest of pains?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the old refusing to give to the new. Change has never been easy, has anyone given birth to a child without a single drop of blood or the faintest of pains?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Odom</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/03/28/print-media-not-dead-but-not-quite-alive-sort-of-a-living-death/comment-page-1/#comment-25831</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Odom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 06:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/03/28/print-media-not-dead-but-not-quite-alive-sort-of-a-living-death/#comment-25831</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree more!

Two papers here in Nevada are desperately trying to shift everything to the internet, but the attempt is failing because they&#039;re doing the exact same thing online as they did in print.

They just don&#039;t get it.

Good post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more!</p>
<p>Two papers here in Nevada are desperately trying to shift everything to the internet, but the attempt is failing because they&#8217;re doing the exact same thing online as they did in print.</p>
<p>They just don&#8217;t get it.</p>
<p>Good post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

