<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Patent Office 2.0 Is Sheer Idiocy (Or, When Crowdsourcing Is Clearly Inappropriate)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/03/05/patent-office-20-is-sheer-idiocy-or-when-crowdsourcing-is-clearly-inappropriate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/03/05/patent-office-20-is-sheer-idiocy-or-when-crowdsourcing-is-clearly-inappropriate/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Web 2.0, Social Media, Marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth Noveck</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/03/05/patent-office-20-is-sheer-idiocy-or-when-crowdsourcing-is-clearly-inappropriate/comment-page-1/#comment-20039</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth Noveck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/03/05/patent-office-20-is-sheer-idiocy-or-when-crowdsourcing-is-clearly-inappropriate/#comment-20039</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the feedback.  I&#039;d like to channel your interest in responding to the actual project as opposed to a lot of misimpressions. Hope this clarifies:

http://cairns.typepad.com/blog/2007/03/peer_to_patent__1.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the feedback.  I&#8217;d like to channel your interest in responding to the actual project as opposed to a lot of misimpressions. Hope this clarifies:</p>
<p><a href="http://cairns.typepad.com/blog/2007/03/peer_to_patent__1.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/cairns.typepad.com');" rel="nofollow">http://cairns.typepad.com/blog/2007/03/peer_to_patent__1.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: engtech</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/03/05/patent-office-20-is-sheer-idiocy-or-when-crowdsourcing-is-clearly-inappropriate/comment-page-1/#comment-19416</link>
		<dc:creator>engtech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 16:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/03/05/patent-office-20-is-sheer-idiocy-or-when-crowdsourcing-is-clearly-inappropriate/#comment-19416</guid>
		<description>I think 6 months is a pessimistic number.

Give it a week after opening. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think 6 months is a pessimistic number.</p>
<p>Give it a week after opening. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Coddington</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/03/05/patent-office-20-is-sheer-idiocy-or-when-crowdsourcing-is-clearly-inappropriate/comment-page-1/#comment-19397</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Coddington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/03/05/patent-office-20-is-sheer-idiocy-or-when-crowdsourcing-is-clearly-inappropriate/#comment-19397</guid>
		<description>Dumbest idea ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dumbest idea ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yer patents are teh SuXx0r! &#187; mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/03/05/patent-office-20-is-sheer-idiocy-or-when-crowdsourcing-is-clearly-inappropriate/comment-page-1/#comment-19301</link>
		<dc:creator>Yer patents are teh SuXx0r! &#187; mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 02:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/03/05/patent-office-20-is-sheer-idiocy-or-when-crowdsourcing-is-clearly-inappropriate/#comment-19301</guid>
		<description>[...] Tony Hung at Deep Jive Interests doesn&#8217;t think it&#8217;s such a great plan, and has come up with a whole pile of reasons why.  Technorati Tags: Internet, patents, social &#124;  Share This &#124;  Sphere It [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tony Hung at Deep Jive Interests doesn&#8217;t think it&#8217;s such a great plan, and has come up with a whole pile of reasons why.  Technorati Tags: Internet, patents, social |  Share This |  Sphere It [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Office In The Country &#187; Patent Office 2.0 Is Sheer Idiocy (Or, When Crowdsourcing Is &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/03/05/patent-office-20-is-sheer-idiocy-or-when-crowdsourcing-is-clearly-inappropriate/comment-page-1/#comment-19283</link>
		<dc:creator>Office In The Country &#187; Patent Office 2.0 Is Sheer Idiocy (Or, When Crowdsourcing Is &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 00:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/03/05/patent-office-20-is-sheer-idiocy-or-when-crowdsourcing-is-clearly-inappropriate/#comment-19283</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post by Tony and software by Elliott Back [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post by Tony and software by Elliott Back [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

