http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/03/04/are-usatodays-changes-about-5-years-too-early/ Thoughts on Web 2.0, Social Media, Marketing. Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:30:48 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/03/04/are-usatodays-changes-about-5-years-too-early/comment-page-1/#comment-227937 limewire Sun, 16 May 2010 06:29:49 +0000 http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/03/04/are-usatodays-changes-about-5-years-too-early/#comment-227937 the Vortex system amazed even me. the Vortex system amazed even me.

]]> http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/03/04/are-usatodays-changes-about-5-years-too-early/comment-page-1/#comment-227280 USAToday.com Socializes News | PR2.0 Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:42:48 +0000 http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/03/04/are-usatodays-changes-about-5-years-too-early/#comment-227280 [...] just became a social networkDeep Jive Interests- Are USAToday’s Changes About 5 Years Too Early?John Dodge – Finds that 92% Don’t Like It. (My take, most people aren’t ready for [...] [...] just became a social networkDeep Jive Interests- Are USAToday’s Changes About 5 Years Too Early?John Dodge – Finds that 92% Don’t Like It. (My take, most people aren’t ready for [...]

]]> http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/03/04/are-usatodays-changes-about-5-years-too-early/comment-page-1/#comment-126036 Information Architects Japan » Blog Archive » USA Today: Mission Accomplished Thu, 31 Jan 2008 07:45:03 +0000 http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/03/04/are-usatodays-changes-about-5-years-too-early/#comment-126036 [...] newspapers have to change is obvious. Don’t belive that staying as you are is going to help you in any [...] [...] newspapers have to change is obvious. Don’t belive that staying as you are is going to help you in any [...]

]]> http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/03/04/are-usatodays-changes-about-5-years-too-early/comment-page-1/#comment-75153 Interesting: USAToday » Webomatica - Technology and Entertainment Digest Sat, 15 Sep 2007 16:08:41 +0000 http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/03/04/are-usatodays-changes-about-5-years-too-early/#comment-75153 [...] I really hope this succeeds and boosts the traffic to USAToday.com. This could be a way forward for newspapers that are being squeezed by a scary future. They certainly earn credit for giving it a try rather than sitting still and waiting to be pushed. Even if it might be an idea ahead of its time. [...] [...] I really hope this succeeds and boosts the traffic to USAToday.com. This could be a way forward for newspapers that are being squeezed by a scary future. They certainly earn credit for giving it a try rather than sitting still and waiting to be pushed. Even if it might be an idea ahead of its time. [...]

]]> http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/03/04/are-usatodays-changes-about-5-years-too-early/comment-page-1/#comment-19452 Burst Blog » USAToday.com Redesign Features BlogBurst! Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:19:49 +0000 http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/03/04/are-usatodays-changes-about-5-years-too-early/#comment-19452 [...] Are USA Today’s Changes About 5 Years Too Early? (Deep Jive Interests) [...] [...] Are USA Today’s Changes About 5 Years Too Early? (Deep Jive Interests) [...]

]]> http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/03/04/are-usatodays-changes-about-5-years-too-early/comment-page-1/#comment-19425 Uldis Zariņš » USA Today jaunā lapa: neveiksme vai panākums? Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:40:29 +0000 http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/03/04/are-usatodays-changes-about-5-years-too-early/#comment-19425 [...] Visdrīzāk, ka ne viens, ne otrs. The Globe and Mail žurnālists Metjū Ingrems norāda, ka līdzīga bija arī lasītāju reakcija uz jauno The Globe and Mail lapas versiju, un atgādināja par sašutuma vētru, kas pavadīja jauno Netscape dizainu; Dons Dodžs norāda uz nepieciešamību rūpīgāk testēt jaunus risinājumus un aktīvāk komunikēt ar lietotājiem, kā arī aicina neieviest vienlaikus gan jaunu lietotāja saskarni, gan jaunu funkcionalitāti. Taču ir arī skeptiķi, kas ir aizdomājušies - bet varbūt sociālo mediju revolūcija ir tikai mūsu iztēles auglis? Ja 92% auditorijas ir neapmierināti ar revolucionārajām izmaiņām, tad kam gan ir taisnība - auditorijai vai revolucionāriem (tā vaicā Skots Karps). Varbūt mēs, tehnogīki, gluži vienkārši pārvērtējam vidējo aritmētisko lasītāju? Arī Tonijs Hangs spriež (piesaucot to pašu Netscape piemēru) - varbūt publika vēl nav gatava, varbūt USA Today nāk gadus piecus par agru? Bet varbūt vairums cilvēku pavisam vienkārši nevēlas mainīt savus informācijas uzņemšanas paradumus un mēs ar visu savu sociālo mediju revolūciju varam iet ieskrieties? [...] [...] Visdrīzāk, ka ne viens, ne otrs. The Globe and Mail žurnālists Metjū Ingrems norāda, ka līdzīga bija arī lasītāju reakcija uz jauno The Globe and Mail lapas versiju, un atgādināja par sašutuma vētru, kas pavadīja jauno Netscape dizainu; Dons Dodžs norāda uz nepieciešamību rūpīgāk testēt jaunus risinājumus un aktīvāk komunikēt ar lietotājiem, kā arī aicina neieviest vienlaikus gan jaunu lietotāja saskarni, gan jaunu funkcionalitāti. Taču ir arī skeptiķi, kas ir aizdomājušies – bet varbūt sociālo mediju revolūcija ir tikai mūsu iztēles auglis? Ja 92% auditorijas ir neapmierināti ar revolucionārajām izmaiņām, tad kam gan ir taisnība – auditorijai vai revolucionāriem (tā vaicā Skots Karps). Varbūt mēs, tehnogīki, gluži vienkārši pārvērtējam vidējo aritmētisko lasītāju? Arī Tonijs Hangs spriež (piesaucot to pašu Netscape piemēru) – varbūt publika vēl nav gatava, varbūt USA Today nāk gadus piecus par agru? Bet varbūt vairums cilvēku pavisam vienkārši nevēlas mainīt savus informācijas uzņemšanas paradumus un mēs ar visu savu sociālo mediju revolūciju varam iet ieskrieties? [...]

]]> http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/03/04/are-usatodays-changes-about-5-years-too-early/comment-page-1/#comment-19366 Samsa news » Blog Archive » USA Today: trop tôt, trop 2.0? Tue, 06 Mar 2007 10:05:12 +0000 http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/03/04/are-usatodays-changes-about-5-years-too-early/#comment-19366 [...] est-ce que les dispositifs 2.0 sont compréhensibles (et attendus) aujourd’hui par une portion suffisante du grand public? (voir à ce propos) [...] [...] est-ce que les dispositifs 2.0 sont compréhensibles (et attendus) aujourd’hui par une portion suffisante du grand public? (voir à ce propos) [...]

]]>