<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bloggers Need To Get Over Themselves And &#8220;The Impossible Standard&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/02/03/bloggers-need-to-get-over-themselves-and-the-impossible-standard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/02/03/bloggers-need-to-get-over-themselves-and-the-impossible-standard/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Web 2.0, Social Media, Marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:17:06 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Scoble please quit ruining my quiet weekends — Shooting at Bubbles</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/02/03/bloggers-need-to-get-over-themselves-and-the-impossible-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-220723</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Scoble please quit ruining my quiet weekends — Shooting at Bubbles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/02/03/bloggers-need-to-get-over-themselves-and-the-impossible-standard/#comment-220723</guid>
		<description>[...] with this was a very thoughtful post on Deep Jive Interests where Tony wrote: But its NOT ok for bloggers without influence, capital, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with this was a very thoughtful post on Deep Jive Interests where Tony wrote: But its NOT ok for bloggers without influence, capital, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/02/03/bloggers-need-to-get-over-themselves-and-the-impossible-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-108768</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/02/03/bloggers-need-to-get-over-themselves-and-the-impossible-standard/#comment-108768</guid>
		<description>I will say &quot;ethical blogging and advertising&quot; will be the only way of the future of blog ads. Google Ads are not intrusive and just are there for readers to read, nothing intrusive but when bloggers are asking those to pay to view their writings, to me are not true bloggers. There are many ways to make money blogging but it must be combined with the proper business sense of integrity. Check out my blog written in About Us on my webpage..&quot;Who&#039;s Who in Whoville&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will say &#8220;ethical blogging and advertising&#8221; will be the only way of the future of blog ads. Google Ads are not intrusive and just are there for readers to read, nothing intrusive but when bloggers are asking those to pay to view their writings, to me are not true bloggers. There are many ways to make money blogging but it must be combined with the proper business sense of integrity. Check out my blog written in About Us on my webpage..&#8221;Who&#8217;s Who in Whoville&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Duck</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/02/03/bloggers-need-to-get-over-themselves-and-the-impossible-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-19121</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Duck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 04:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/02/03/bloggers-need-to-get-over-themselves-and-the-impossible-standard/#comment-19121</guid>
		<description>A nicely articulated rant!   Yes, I&#039;m tired of hearing about how outrageous the PPP concept is, and although I have reservations about the whole mess of Pay Per Post I agree that there is more enough hypocrisy to go around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A nicely articulated rant!   Yes, I&#8217;m tired of hearing about how outrageous the PPP concept is, and although I have reservations about the whole mess of Pay Per Post I agree that there is more enough hypocrisy to go around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HMTKSteve</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/02/03/bloggers-need-to-get-over-themselves-and-the-impossible-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-14428</link>
		<dc:creator>HMTKSteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 00:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/02/03/bloggers-need-to-get-over-themselves-and-the-impossible-standard/#comment-14428</guid>
		<description>That would be correct. HMTK is Steve&#039;s &#039;No Frills&#039; HackMaster Toolkit. It&#039;s a piece of software I used to develop... until my license ran out and I decided not to renew.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would be correct. HMTK is Steve&#8217;s &#8216;No Frills&#8217; HackMaster Toolkit. It&#8217;s a piece of software I used to develop&#8230; until my license ran out and I decided not to renew.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms. Q</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/02/03/bloggers-need-to-get-over-themselves-and-the-impossible-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-14427</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms. Q</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 23:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/02/03/bloggers-need-to-get-over-themselves-and-the-impossible-standard/#comment-14427</guid>
		<description>Tony - way off the topic, but you mentioned, &quot;HMTKSteve (I’m going to have to ask you what the HMTK stands for one day, Steve)&quot; and it made me wonder.

I just assumed that HMTK was something along the lines of &quot;His Majesty The King.&quot; A tongue-in-cheek over-the-top kind of name.

I went to Steve&#039;s site, rummaged around and saw that it stands for HackMaster Toolkit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony &#8211; way off the topic, but you mentioned, &#8220;HMTKSteve (I’m going to have to ask you what the HMTK stands for one day, Steve)&#8221; and it made me wonder.</p>
<p>I just assumed that HMTK was something along the lines of &#8220;His Majesty The King.&#8221; A tongue-in-cheek over-the-top kind of name.</p>
<p>I went to Steve&#8217;s site, rummaged around and saw that it stands for HackMaster Toolkit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HMTKSteve</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/02/03/bloggers-need-to-get-over-themselves-and-the-impossible-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-14355</link>
		<dc:creator>HMTKSteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 17:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/02/03/bloggers-need-to-get-over-themselves-and-the-impossible-standard/#comment-14355</guid>
		<description>Tony,

I agree. That check in the mail that helps keep my bank balance in the black is best :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony,</p>
<p>I agree. That check in the mail that helps keep my bank balance in the black is best :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/02/03/bloggers-need-to-get-over-themselves-and-the-impossible-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-14353</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 17:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/02/03/bloggers-need-to-get-over-themselves-and-the-impossible-standard/#comment-14353</guid>
		<description>Dawud -- I don&#039;t think anyone should be penalized for a late start either, and just to clarify, I think Leigh was questioning why checks and balances were necessary if PPP is &quot;bad&quot;. Good luck with healthywebdesign though ... and keep up the good work.

Leigh -- PPP has already made an about-face with disclosure, requiring it in some form (but, according to Bob Scoble, not in its best form) what with the FTC issuing an opinion in December about deceptive disclosure practices.  I&#039;ve said it before -- its going to be around for awhile for no other reason that some bloggers are happy to take their money.  As I said, checks and balances are probably best ... but I&#039;m not sure how that can be created at the moment.

Cheers
tony.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dawud &#8212; I don&#8217;t think anyone should be penalized for a late start either, and just to clarify, I think Leigh was questioning why checks and balances were necessary if PPP is &#8220;bad&#8221;. Good luck with healthywebdesign though &#8230; and keep up the good work.</p>
<p>Leigh &#8212; PPP has already made an about-face with disclosure, requiring it in some form (but, according to Bob Scoble, not in its best form) what with the FTC issuing an opinion in December about deceptive disclosure practices.  I&#8217;ve said it before &#8212; its going to be around for awhile for no other reason that some bloggers are happy to take their money.  As I said, checks and balances are probably best &#8230; but I&#8217;m not sure how that can be created at the moment.</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
tony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
