<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: But Is The Blogosophere Self-Regulating?  Don&#8217;t Delude Yourself</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/29/but-is-the-blogosophere-self-regulating-dont-delude-yourself/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/29/but-is-the-blogosophere-self-regulating-dont-delude-yourself/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Web 2.0, Social Media, Marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/29/but-is-the-blogosophere-self-regulating-dont-delude-yourself/comment-page-1/#comment-3556</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 03:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/29/but-is-the-blogosophere-self-regulating-dont-delude-yourself/#comment-3556</guid>
		<description>True say, Jim ... true say.
Sadly, most people will act only in their best interests, and its naive to think otherwise in most cases.

Thanks for popping on by!
t@ dji</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True say, Jim &#8230; true say.<br />
Sadly, most people will act only in their best interests, and its naive to think otherwise in most cases.</p>
<p>Thanks for popping on by!<br />
t@ dji</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/29/but-is-the-blogosophere-self-regulating-dont-delude-yourself/comment-page-1/#comment-3546</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 00:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/29/but-is-the-blogosophere-self-regulating-dont-delude-yourself/#comment-3546</guid>
		<description>Tony:

Nicely done.  It is always nice to think people can be self regulating.  However, the fact is we are selfish and self-motivated.  We operate based on what will best meet our needs and interests.  It&#039;s fact, people will regulate if they think there is a consequence to their actions otherwise forget it.  Ex: Stats are 50% of people don&#039;t wash their hands after using the bathroom, but I bet it would be 100% if an alarm alerted the whole restaurant they didn&#039;t.  If self regulating is in someone&#039;s interest then yes they will if not, forget about it.  It&#039;s too bad, but true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony:</p>
<p>Nicely done.  It is always nice to think people can be self regulating.  However, the fact is we are selfish and self-motivated.  We operate based on what will best meet our needs and interests.  It&#8217;s fact, people will regulate if they think there is a consequence to their actions otherwise forget it.  Ex: Stats are 50% of people don&#8217;t wash their hands after using the bathroom, but I bet it would be 100% if an alarm alerted the whole restaurant they didn&#8217;t.  If self regulating is in someone&#8217;s interest then yes they will if not, forget about it.  It&#8217;s too bad, but true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/29/but-is-the-blogosophere-self-regulating-dont-delude-yourself/comment-page-1/#comment-3252</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 05:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/29/but-is-the-blogosophere-self-regulating-dont-delude-yourself/#comment-3252</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the kind words franky -- its a bit naive to think that the blogosphere is self policing, and that any blogger at the drop of a hat has an equal voice.

Sure, the potential for that exists -- but without a network of existing contacts, or the ability to leverage existing popularity/ celebrity [or even having that popularity], it takes time.  

And in some cases, it takes such a long time that parity effectively doesn&#039;t exist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the kind words franky &#8212; its a bit naive to think that the blogosphere is self policing, and that any blogger at the drop of a hat has an equal voice.</p>
<p>Sure, the potential for that exists &#8212; but without a network of existing contacts, or the ability to leverage existing popularity/ celebrity [or even having that popularity], it takes time.  </p>
<p>And in some cases, it takes such a long time that parity effectively doesn&#8217;t exist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: franky</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/29/but-is-the-blogosophere-self-regulating-dont-delude-yourself/comment-page-1/#comment-3228</link>
		<dc:creator>franky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/29/but-is-the-blogosophere-self-regulating-dont-delude-yourself/#comment-3228</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t like this kind of stereotype comment, but this truly is a great post. 
Blogging popularity is a herd event. And surely subject to the avalanche effect. But this just shows us how much &lt;em&gt;real life&lt;/em&gt; the internet has become.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t like this kind of stereotype comment, but this truly is a great post.<br />
Blogging popularity is a herd event. And surely subject to the avalanche effect. But this just shows us how much <em>real life</em> the internet has become.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

