<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digg Has Moderators &#8212; They Just Suck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/24/digg-has-moderators-they-just-suck/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/24/digg-has-moderators-they-just-suck/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Web 2.0, Social Media, Marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sex shop</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/24/digg-has-moderators-they-just-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-227963</link>
		<dc:creator>sex shop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 10:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/24/digg-has-moderators-they-just-suck/#comment-227963</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much! I checked out the other two tutorials you’ve put up linked from digg and found them helpful, but this sealed it for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much! I checked out the other two tutorials you’ve put up linked from digg and found them helpful, but this sealed it for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: limewire</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/24/digg-has-moderators-they-just-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-227941</link>
		<dc:creator>limewire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 06:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/24/digg-has-moderators-they-just-suck/#comment-227941</guid>
		<description>the Vortex syste amazed even me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the Vortex syste amazed even me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deep Jive Interests &#187; Recommended Reads: July 3, 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/24/digg-has-moderators-they-just-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-50215</link>
		<dc:creator>Deep Jive Interests &#187; Recommended Reads: July 3, 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 04:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/24/digg-has-moderators-they-just-suck/#comment-50215</guid>
		<description>[...] [STALE] I love Richard MacManus&#8217;s Read/Write Web.  But jeez, isn&#8217;t this whole conversation about Digg requiring / having / needing better editors / moderators about 8 months old? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [STALE] I love Richard MacManus&#8217;s Read/Write Web.  But jeez, isn&#8217;t this whole conversation about Digg requiring / having / needing better editors / moderators about 8 months old? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deep Jive Interests &#187; Digg Revolt? Oh, The Delicious Irony.</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/24/digg-has-moderators-they-just-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-33677</link>
		<dc:creator>Deep Jive Interests &#187; Digg Revolt? Oh, The Delicious Irony.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 05:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/24/digg-has-moderators-they-just-suck/#comment-33677</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;spam&#8221; button so that he doesn&#8217;t have to employ a serious number of moderators? He&#8217;s *depending* on the community to &#8220;police&#8221; itself, because he doesn&#8217;t have the will to hire enough people to police itself? (or the cash. Or, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;spam&#8221; button so that he doesn&#8217;t have to employ a serious number of moderators? He&#8217;s *depending* on the community to &#8220;police&#8221; itself, because he doesn&#8217;t have the will to hire enough people to police itself? (or the cash. Or, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digg, The Democracy Is Put In Observation &#124; Am I Famous Now&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/24/digg-has-moderators-they-just-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-5566</link>
		<dc:creator>Digg, The Democracy Is Put In Observation &#124; Am I Famous Now&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 15:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/24/digg-has-moderators-they-just-suck/#comment-5566</guid>
		<description>[...] Top Diggers should become moderator if they are interested (eventually even renumerated). The Netscape model has proven his value. A moderator should be allowed to correct typos, correct links and many more. But at the same time moderators should have the power to immediately ban spam entries (close down as Netscape calls it) and to move entries among categories. Every action of a moderator should be disclosed. Moderator&#8217;s submissions should not have any higher status. Read more about Digg&#8217;s moderators at Deep Jive Interests. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Top Diggers should become moderator if they are interested (eventually even renumerated). The Netscape model has proven his value. A moderator should be allowed to correct typos, correct links and many more. But at the same time moderators should have the power to immediately ban spam entries (close down as Netscape calls it) and to move entries among categories. Every action of a moderator should be disclosed. Moderator&#8217;s submissions should not have any higher status. Read more about Digg&#8217;s moderators at Deep Jive Interests. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Stratton</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/24/digg-has-moderators-they-just-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-4797</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Stratton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 00:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/24/digg-has-moderators-they-just-suck/#comment-4797</guid>
		<description>Leo Laporte and Amber MacArthur interviewed Kevin on Net@night episode 5:The Digg Effect http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=3185(where they take caller questions)

The question of how Digg is monitered/moderated is asked by a caller, and Kevin answers him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leo Laporte and Amber MacArthur interviewed Kevin on Net@night episode 5:The Digg Effect <a href="http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=3185(where" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/www.talkshoe.com');" rel="nofollow">http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=3185(where</a> they take caller questions)</p>
<p>The question of how Digg is monitered/moderated is asked by a caller, and Kevin answers him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neunetz.com &#187; Wikio- Ein weiterer Anwärter für den deutschen Diggthron</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/24/digg-has-moderators-they-just-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-4004</link>
		<dc:creator>neunetz.com &#187; Wikio- Ein weiterer Anwärter für den deutschen Diggthron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/24/digg-has-moderators-they-just-suck/#comment-4004</guid>
		<description>[...] Auch digg hat immer wieder mit seiner Glaubw&#252;rdigkeit zu k&#228;mpfen. Seine Moderatoren wurden in der englischsprachigen Blogwelt immer wieder (zum Gro&#223;teil zu Recht) kritisiert. Scheindemokratie, anyone? Wer eine Seite zu einem gro&#223;en Teil auf usergenerated Content aufbaut, ist besser so transparent wie m&#246;glich, sonst fliegt ihm der ganze Mumpitz irgendwann um die Ohren. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Auch digg hat immer wieder mit seiner Glaubw&#252;rdigkeit zu k&#228;mpfen. Seine Moderatoren wurden in der englischsprachigen Blogwelt immer wieder (zum Gro&#223;teil zu Recht) kritisiert. Scheindemokratie, anyone? Wer eine Seite zu einem gro&#223;en Teil auf usergenerated Content aufbaut, ist besser so transparent wie m&#246;glich, sonst fliegt ihm der ganze Mumpitz irgendwann um die Ohren. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

