<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prince &#8220;Chartreuse&#8221; Campbell Has Gone MIA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/23/prince-chartreuse-campbell-has-gone-mia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/23/prince-chartreuse-campbell-has-gone-mia/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Web 2.0, Social Media, Marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:17:06 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ankit</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/23/prince-chartreuse-campbell-has-gone-mia/comment-page-1/#comment-2994</link>
		<dc:creator>Ankit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 05:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/23/prince-chartreuse-campbell-has-gone-mia/#comment-2994</guid>
		<description>He was a great writer. Its really sad to see him disappear. I used to love most of him posts, though many a times I didn`t agree with him, but the way he use to tell his ideas via short stories and simple lines was unmatched. 

The last post of him I read was on the &quot;BloggingTimes&quot;. I wish he could start his chartreuse blog again. 

&gt;&gt;I can’t believe the whole Chartreuse thing collapsed so fast - the subscription idea (and all that went with it) was never going to work - it was like he was purposely self-destructing his image.

Yeah, I too agree with you Martin on this, but he is such prolific writer, he can build a blog from zero in no time. He has such great abilities, that he can rise from anywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He was a great writer. Its really sad to see him disappear. I used to love most of him posts, though many a times I didn`t agree with him, but the way he use to tell his ideas via short stories and simple lines was unmatched. </p>
<p>The last post of him I read was on the &#8220;BloggingTimes&#8221;. I wish he could start his chartreuse blog again. </p>
<p>&gt;&gt;I can’t believe the whole Chartreuse thing collapsed so fast &#8211; the subscription idea (and all that went with it) was never going to work &#8211; it was like he was purposely self-destructing his image.</p>
<p>Yeah, I too agree with you Martin on this, but he is such prolific writer, he can build a blog from zero in no time. He has such great abilities, that he can rise from anywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/23/prince-chartreuse-campbell-has-gone-mia/comment-page-1/#comment-2941</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 13:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/23/prince-chartreuse-campbell-has-gone-mia/#comment-2941</guid>
		<description>Hope it&#039;s just a case of him not wanting to be found, or he&#039;s onto another gig and nothing else.

Either way, not much we can do expect to keep an eye if he appears on the b&#039;sphere someplace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hope it&#8217;s just a case of him not wanting to be found, or he&#8217;s onto another gig and nothing else.</p>
<p>Either way, not much we can do expect to keep an eye if he appears on the b&#8217;sphere someplace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/23/prince-chartreuse-campbell-has-gone-mia/comment-page-1/#comment-2940</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 13:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/23/prince-chartreuse-campbell-has-gone-mia/#comment-2940</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I noticed that -- didn&#039;t want to dwell on that too much and wanted to focus on the fact the chap is missing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I noticed that &#8212; didn&#8217;t want to dwell on that too much and wanted to focus on the fact the chap is missing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/23/prince-chartreuse-campbell-has-gone-mia/comment-page-1/#comment-2939</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 13:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/23/prince-chartreuse-campbell-has-gone-mia/#comment-2939</guid>
		<description>Not sure, but by the sounds of Loren&#039;s post things didn&#039;t end happily between them. Read the post closely, something happened.

I can&#039;t believe the whole Chartreuse thing collapsed so fast - the subscription idea (and all that went with it) was never going to work - it was like he was purposely self-destructing his image. Strange.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure, but by the sounds of Loren&#8217;s post things didn&#8217;t end happily between them. Read the post closely, something happened.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t believe the whole Chartreuse thing collapsed so fast &#8211; the subscription idea (and all that went with it) was never going to work &#8211; it was like he was purposely self-destructing his image. Strange.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: engtech</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/23/prince-chartreuse-campbell-has-gone-mia/comment-page-1/#comment-2924</link>
		<dc:creator>engtech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 04:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/23/prince-chartreuse-campbell-has-gone-mia/#comment-2924</guid>
		<description>Too bad, I quite enjoyed chartreuse every 2 posts out of 5. 

Which is a pretty good ratio.

When chartreuse2 first came up the password for the protected posts was publicly available if you snooped enough through the pages. There really wasn&#039;t anything to though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad, I quite enjoyed chartreuse every 2 posts out of 5. </p>
<p>Which is a pretty good ratio.</p>
<p>When chartreuse2 first came up the password for the protected posts was publicly available if you snooped enough through the pages. There really wasn&#8217;t anything to though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
