<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digg&#8217;s Failure: When &#8220;No Moderation&#8221; Doesn&#8217;t Work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/22/diggs-failure-when-no-moderation-doesnt-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/22/diggs-failure-when-no-moderation-doesnt-work/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Web 2.0, Social Media, Marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 06:10:44 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tracy Esau</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/22/diggs-failure-when-no-moderation-doesnt-work/comment-page-1/#comment-146758</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracy Esau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 05:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/22/diggs-failure-when-no-moderation-doesnt-work/#comment-146758</guid>
		<description>There are always people there in the market pointing at the negative aspect of things. I would say pointing at negativity is not bad at all because it helps to become efficient but on the other hand one should appreciate the positive features as well for appreciation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are always people there in the market pointing at the negative aspect of things. I would say pointing at negativity is not bad at all because it helps to become efficient but on the other hand one should appreciate the positive features as well for appreciation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cory Kemp</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/22/diggs-failure-when-no-moderation-doesnt-work/comment-page-1/#comment-13594</link>
		<dc:creator>Cory Kemp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 06:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/22/diggs-failure-when-no-moderation-doesnt-work/#comment-13594</guid>
		<description>The sad fact is, there will always be spammers, and they will always find ways around safeguards. The fact is, spammers are more determined than the &quot;good guys&quot; are to stop them. I&#039;m worried that spammers are killing the net...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sad fact is, there will always be spammers, and they will always find ways around safeguards. The fact is, spammers are more determined than the &#8220;good guys&#8221; are to stop them. I&#8217;m worried that spammers are killing the net&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WEB NEWS &#187; When A Spam Site Isn&#8217;t Spammy</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/22/diggs-failure-when-no-moderation-doesnt-work/comment-page-1/#comment-5891</link>
		<dc:creator>WEB NEWS &#187; When A Spam Site Isn&#8217;t Spammy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 20:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/22/diggs-failure-when-no-moderation-doesnt-work/#comment-5891</guid>
		<description>[...] It may be dodgy if its affiliate does not offer a valid product, but if those dental plans are legitimate, the site may be a decent example of gaming search optimization and social media without being the spam node Kennedy and other bloggers have called it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It may be dodgy if its affiliate does not offer a valid product, but if those dental plans are legitimate, the site may be a decent example of gaming search optimization and social media without being the spam node Kennedy and other bloggers have called it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Mu Life &#187; The Keepers Of The Democratic Web</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/22/diggs-failure-when-no-moderation-doesnt-work/comment-page-1/#comment-2853</link>
		<dc:creator>The Mu Life &#187; The Keepers Of The Democratic Web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 20:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/22/diggs-failure-when-no-moderation-doesnt-work/#comment-2853</guid>
		<description>[...] Both Niall Kennedy and Dr. Tony Hung make the case for some sort of regulation of the democratic (read social) web: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Both Niall Kennedy and Dr. Tony Hung make the case for some sort of regulation of the democratic (read social) web: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HMTKSteve</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/22/diggs-failure-when-no-moderation-doesnt-work/comment-page-1/#comment-2844</link>
		<dc:creator>HMTKSteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/22/diggs-failure-when-no-moderation-doesnt-work/#comment-2844</guid>
		<description>1 hour and 16 minutes and this Digg story has been buried!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1 hour and 16 minutes and this Digg story has been buried!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/22/diggs-failure-when-no-moderation-doesnt-work/comment-page-1/#comment-2841</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/22/diggs-failure-when-no-moderation-doesnt-work/#comment-2841</guid>
		<description>Well, conspiracy theorists aside, there are a healthy bunch of Digg boosters who will also &quot;bury&quot; posts, so that might be what happened as well.

When posts and diggers completely disappear -- which is something that no one can do, save for the Command and Control behind Digg -- that&#039;s when you can start strapping on your aluminum foil helmet :)

But Editorial shennanigans have been happening for a long time (see my own abbreviated short history on Digg).  Digg&#039;s people, however, will call it &quot;spam control&quot;.

Call it what you want, but its still editorial pressure -- and if they&#039;re doing that, who knows what other undocumented stuff they&#039;re doing? :)

Cheers
t</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, conspiracy theorists aside, there are a healthy bunch of Digg boosters who will also &#8220;bury&#8221; posts, so that might be what happened as well.</p>
<p>When posts and diggers completely disappear &#8212; which is something that no one can do, save for the Command and Control behind Digg &#8212; that&#8217;s when you can start strapping on your aluminum foil helmet :)</p>
<p>But Editorial shennanigans have been happening for a long time (see my own abbreviated short history on Digg).  Digg&#8217;s people, however, will call it &#8220;spam control&#8221;.</p>
<p>Call it what you want, but its still editorial pressure &#8212; and if they&#8217;re doing that, who knows what other undocumented stuff they&#8217;re doing? :)</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
t</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HMTKSteve</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/22/diggs-failure-when-no-moderation-doesnt-work/comment-page-1/#comment-2840</link>
		<dc:creator>HMTKSteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/22/diggs-failure-when-no-moderation-doesnt-work/#comment-2840</guid>
		<description>Amazing how great minds think alike!

I just blogged about this very topic today after a post about the Digg/News Corp deal, that was on my blog, got buried on Digg super fast!

The same post over on Netscape got an amazing (for Netscape) 12+ votes!

I think there is some sort of strange editorial control going on behind the scenes at Digg.

Try doing a search on Digg for &quot;Kevin Rose&quot; then do a second search with the &quot;include buried&quot; option check.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing how great minds think alike!</p>
<p>I just blogged about this very topic today after a post about the Digg/News Corp deal, that was on my blog, got buried on Digg super fast!</p>
<p>The same post over on Netscape got an amazing (for Netscape) 12+ votes!</p>
<p>I think there is some sort of strange editorial control going on behind the scenes at Digg.</p>
<p>Try doing a search on Digg for &#8220;Kevin Rose&#8221; then do a second search with the &#8220;include buried&#8221; option check.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
