http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/21/diggs-editors-show-their-invisible-hand-again/ Thoughts on Web 2.0, Social Media, Marketing. Sat, 20 Mar 2010 06:10:44 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/21/diggs-editors-show-their-invisible-hand-again/comment-page-1/#comment-3108 Working Pathways » If Not Traffic and Page Views, What Do We Measure? Mon, 27 Nov 2006 15:00:37 +0000 http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/21/diggs-editors-show-their-invisible-hand-again/#comment-3108 [...] Related Elsewhere: Deep Jive Interests: Digg’s Failure: When “No Moderation” Doesn’t Work Deep Jive Interests: Digg’s Editors Show Their Invisible Hand (Again) Micro Persuasion: Fake News Story Games Thousands of Digg Users November 22, 2006 at 12:36 pm by Garrick Van Buren Tags: Customer Relationship, Social Networks [...] [...] Related Elsewhere: Deep Jive Interests: Digg’s Failure: When “No Moderation” Doesn’t Work Deep Jive Interests: Digg’s Editors Show Their Invisible Hand (Again) Micro Persuasion: Fake News Story Games Thousands of Digg Users November 22, 2006 at 12:36 pm by Garrick Van Buren Tags: Customer Relationship, Social Networks [...]

]]> http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/21/diggs-editors-show-their-invisible-hand-again/comment-page-1/#comment-2933 Poke Times » Late breaking news Fri, 24 Nov 2006 06:46:08 +0000 http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/21/diggs-editors-show-their-invisible-hand-again/#comment-2933 [...] Muhammad and I have been having a discussion via IM about the fact that Digg appears to have removed the story, not just from the front page but from the site completely. He argues that this is wrong, and that Digg administrators should have removed it from the front page but left the story up and flagged it as inaccurate. As it is, it looks as though the site is trying to pretend that the incident never happened. Tony Hung says that by removing it, Digg is going against its stated principles as a social media site. What do you think? [...] [...] Muhammad and I have been having a discussion via IM about the fact that Digg appears to have removed the story, not just from the front page but from the site completely. He argues that this is wrong, and that Digg administrators should have removed it from the front page but left the story up and flagged it as inaccurate. As it is, it looks as though the site is trying to pretend that the incident never happened. Tony Hung says that by removing it, Digg is going against its stated principles as a social media site. What do you think? [...]

]]> http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/21/diggs-editors-show-their-invisible-hand-again/comment-page-1/#comment-2796 Otro retoque de Digg a sus noticias « Ondas, cables, luces, cacharritos y cachivaches Tue, 21 Nov 2006 20:30:33 +0000 http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/21/diggs-editors-show-their-invisible-hand-again/#comment-2796 [...] Como en tantas otras cosas, errores puede haber. Incluso estupideces soberanas. Pero si sabes de que pié cojea cada uno, es muy fácil aclararse. El problema de verdad es cuando, bajo la bandera de los ’sitios sociales’ y de lo modernos que son, nos dedicamos a publicar o borrar las noticias que queramos, que parece que es lo que pasa en Digg una y otra vez, como cuentan también en deep jive interests… [...] [...] Como en tantas otras cosas, errores puede haber. Incluso estupideces soberanas. Pero si sabes de que pié cojea cada uno, es muy fácil aclararse. El problema de verdad es cuando, bajo la bandera de los ’sitios sociales’ y de lo modernos que son, nos dedicamos a publicar o borrar las noticias que queramos, que parece que es lo que pasa en Digg una y otra vez, como cuentan también en deep jive interests… [...]

]]>