<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Richard Edelman Goes On Record: Junior Execs Handled Wal-Mart Case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/01/richard-edelman-goes-on-record-junior-execs-handled-wal-mart-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/01/richard-edelman-goes-on-record-junior-execs-handled-wal-mart-case/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Web 2.0, Social Media, Marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social Media Relations at Student PR Blog: Chris Clarke&#8217;s Perspective on Public Relations and Online Communications</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/01/richard-edelman-goes-on-record-junior-execs-handled-wal-mart-case/comment-page-1/#comment-1456</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Media Relations at Student PR Blog: Chris Clarke&#8217;s Perspective on Public Relations and Online Communications</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 05:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/01/richard-edelman-goes-on-record-junior-execs-handled-wal-mart-case/#comment-1456</guid>
		<description>[...] In the post, he had this to say: Thanks to Tony Hung for the email pointing me to the interview. Tony—a third-year medical resident who blogs about a variety of issues at ”Deep Jive Interests”—has written his own observations about the interview, expressing astonishment that Edelman would assign the plum Wal-Mart account to junior executives. That’s not what Edelman meant, though; in fact, I find that inexperienced 25-year-old PR newcomers (like Chris Clarke) get the blogosphere and its morals much better than 25-year veteran account executives with deep experience in traditional PR but to whom social media is an alien world. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In the post, he had this to say: Thanks to Tony Hung for the email pointing me to the interview. Tony—a third-year medical resident who blogs about a variety of issues at ”Deep Jive Interests”—has written his own observations about the interview, expressing astonishment that Edelman would assign the plum Wal-Mart account to junior executives. That’s not what Edelman meant, though; in fact, I find that inexperienced 25-year-old PR newcomers (like Chris Clarke) get the blogosphere and its morals much better than 25-year veteran account executives with deep experience in traditional PR but to whom social media is an alien world. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/01/richard-edelman-goes-on-record-junior-execs-handled-wal-mart-case/comment-page-1/#comment-1158</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 16:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/11/01/richard-edelman-goes-on-record-junior-execs-handled-wal-mart-case/#comment-1158</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe he&#039;s trying to shift the blame for screwing up one of the firm&#039;s biggest accounts to &quot;inexperienced&quot; execs.  does he mean the execs are inexperienced PRs (if so, why would they be in a position to lead an account like this one) or that they&#039;re inexperienced in social media (in which case, why didn&#039;t they access the me2revolution resource that&#039;s been trumpeted so widely both internally and externally)?

i think it raises more questions than it answers unfortunately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe he&#8217;s trying to shift the blame for screwing up one of the firm&#8217;s biggest accounts to &#8220;inexperienced&#8221; execs.  does he mean the execs are inexperienced PRs (if so, why would they be in a position to lead an account like this one) or that they&#8217;re inexperienced in social media (in which case, why didn&#8217;t they access the me2revolution resource that&#8217;s been trumpeted so widely both internally and externally)?</p>
<p>i think it raises more questions than it answers unfortunately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

