<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s Latest Gambit: Too Smart to Be Evil?  Or Are We Just Naive?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/10/31/googles-latest-gambit-too-smart-to-be-evil-or-are-we-just-naive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/10/31/googles-latest-gambit-too-smart-to-be-evil-or-are-we-just-naive/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Web 2.0, Social Media, Marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 06:10:44 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Deep Jive Interests &#187; Colbert, Stewart Safe for Now as Viacom Makes Love, Not War, With YouTube</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/10/31/googles-latest-gambit-too-smart-to-be-evil-or-are-we-just-naive/comment-page-1/#comment-1147</link>
		<dc:creator>Deep Jive Interests &#187; Colbert, Stewart Safe for Now as Viacom Makes Love, Not War, With YouTube</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 07:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/10/31/googles-latest-gambit-too-smart-to-be-evil-or-are-we-just-naive/#comment-1147</guid>
		<description>[...] Also of note the phrase &#8220;protect our talented artists&#8221; &#8212; would be incongruent if Mark Cuban&#8217;s &#8220;insider post&#8221; were true; which means that either Viacom won&#8217;t be protecting their artists financially (frozen out, because it wouldn&#8217;t be a licensing agreement, but an &#8220;investment&#8221;), or, perhaps the insider&#8217;s opinion is just plain wrong. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Also of note the phrase &#8220;protect our talented artists&#8221; &#8212; would be incongruent if Mark Cuban&#8217;s &#8220;insider post&#8221; were true; which means that either Viacom won&#8217;t be protecting their artists financially (frozen out, because it wouldn&#8217;t be a licensing agreement, but an &#8220;investment&#8221;), or, perhaps the insider&#8217;s opinion is just plain wrong. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
