<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Firefox Snob Confesses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/10/20/a-firefox-snob-confesses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/10/20/a-firefox-snob-confesses/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Web 2.0, Social Media, Marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/10/20/a-firefox-snob-confesses/comment-page-1/#comment-632</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 04:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/10/20/a-firefox-snob-confesses/#comment-632</guid>
		<description>Good to hear it! ;)

One more reason to upgrade, I suppose.  I&#039;m keeping my fingers crossed to see if it indeed leaks less memory (although I&#039;m not holding my breath by any means).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to hear it! ;)</p>
<p>One more reason to upgrade, I suppose.  I&#8217;m keeping my fingers crossed to see if it indeed leaks less memory (although I&#8217;m not holding my breath by any means).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/10/20/a-firefox-snob-confesses/comment-page-1/#comment-629</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 02:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/10/20/a-firefox-snob-confesses/#comment-629</guid>
		<description>So far all bar one of my favourite extensions worked in FF2, and the one that didn&#039;t I found an alternative for anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far all bar one of my favourite extensions worked in FF2, and the one that didn&#8217;t I found an alternative for anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/10/20/a-firefox-snob-confesses/comment-page-1/#comment-628</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 01:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/10/20/a-firefox-snob-confesses/#comment-628</guid>
		<description>You know, its like the giant elephant in the room that no one likes to talk about it.

I&#039;m glad some other folks have noticed it. ;)

Always a pleasure Duncan,
t

PS I&#039;ll have to try FF2.0 soon ... I&#039;m never sure how my favourite extensions will do with the upgrade.  Sort of like a wp upgrade. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, its like the giant elephant in the room that no one likes to talk about it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad some other folks have noticed it. ;)</p>
<p>Always a pleasure Duncan,<br />
t</p>
<p>PS I&#8217;ll have to try FF2.0 soon &#8230; I&#8217;m never sure how my favourite extensions will do with the upgrade.  Sort of like a wp upgrade. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/10/20/a-firefox-snob-confesses/comment-page-1/#comment-624</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 01:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/10/20/a-firefox-snob-confesses/#comment-624</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve not seen a test yet, but FF 2.0 RC2 and 3 (just updated to 3 yesterday) don&#039;t seem to hog as much memory as the last version from my use of it, where as the last version of FF...well, you&#039;re 100% right :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve not seen a test yet, but FF 2.0 RC2 and 3 (just updated to 3 yesterday) don&#8217;t seem to hog as much memory as the last version from my use of it, where as the last version of FF&#8230;well, you&#8217;re 100% right :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

