Seems like TechCrunch isn’t the only company around that is having trademark issues.
Apple is throwing around its litigious might again, sending a cease and desist to another company whose name or products resemble the name iPod.
The blogosphere is yet again picking up on this:
- Jasan Calacanis feels getting sued by Apple out of existence is the best thing a small company (from a marketing point of view)
- Dave Winer puts podcasting into a bit of a historical perspective
- Leo Laporte feels that we ought to just call it a different name (”Netcasting?”)
However, unlike TechCrunch, Apple is having the same problem Google had a few weeks ago — which, quite frankly, in the realm of “problems” is actually a nice problem to have:
Apple and its products are so big and so popular, that they have become synomyous with a product category itself.
“Google”, for example, has moved beyond the proper noun that describes the company, on to a verb (”small g”) that describes the process of searching for stuff (using Google). As Steve Reubel notes – its even in the dictionary.
“Xerox” has also moved beyond the proper noun to a verb that describes making a copy using a photocopier.
Kleenex.
Rolodex.
Frisbee.
Palm.
Now, “Podcast” joins them. It has become synonymous with the process of an audio recording that you can easily subscribe through RSS technologies on the Internet.
Why is Apple gettings it underwear in knots? Why bother protecting your trademark by hauling out your all-star law team?

Sometimes on weekends, I’ll be posting about non-web2.0, non-blogging, whatever happens to interest me kind of stuff.
Early this morning (eastern standard time),
Metrics nerds, rejoice!
