With all of the hoopla surrounding the TechCrunch 7 love-in August Capital Party, the photos, the hobnobbing, and all the seeing-and-beeing-seen, you can’t help but notice a distinct hierarchy in the blogosphere.
I mean, when you look at all of the photos, it really resembles a giant Hollywood style party – I half expected Entertainment Tonight to show up, with Mary Hart or Vanessa Minillo trying to grab 30 second sound bites about “What the Web2.0 Means To Them”.
“That”, you might say, “sure as hell sounds like sour grapes”.
But its not.
I also recognize that many or all of them have gotten to be where they are through a combination of sheer will, innovation (or mashing up), timing, a helluva lot of hard work none of us see, an ungodly amount of networking, and a whisper of luck.
For those of them that are bloggers, those A-listers they’ve been rewarded with a certain amount of power, influence, and credibility (while command eyeballs and traffic).
For everyone else — well, we’re still working our asses off. ;)
Take me for instance.
I’ll be the first one to admit there is nothing original about this blog. How many other tech and web2.0 related blogs are there? Probably enough to fill a Star Trek convention. But I’m pounding the blogosphere everyday blogging about stuff that I’m interested and have a genuine passion for.
And I guess a lot of us fill that boat.
So, as a brief aside, for all of us who wield absolutely NO power or influence — who struggle with a pagerank of zero, and whose “linkpopularity” is so laughably low we would love to be obscure because we border on the invisible, I raise my flagon to you, you blogging-to-the-bone D-listers, you.
But back to my rant: for me, the most frustrating part of being a D-List blogger (I hope I’m at least that), however, isn’t the lack of traffic, adsense dollars, or mentions in prominent blogs. It isn’t even the possibility of being invited to the TechCrunch-allapalooza … as part of the waitstaff.
Personally, its the lack of credibility.
“Sure”, you might ask, “what have you done to earn it?”
“Well”, I might rejoinder, “admittedly, not much”.
I just blog everyday. Sometimes twice. Sometimes even thrice.
But that’s about it.
I don’t do the mulit-post-comment-thing; nor, the submit-to-blog-networks-thing; nor even the buy-text-ads-so-I-can-get-links-thing.
Yes, I don’t know many important people in the blogosphere, and they don’t really know me.
Granted, that’s partly my fault — but I attribute my anti-social traits here to having a full time job.
Its a weak crutch, I know.
But the lack of credibility, and the “who the hell are you” factor, really hurt this week.
I was trying to bring honest attention to the controversy over at Digg with “Aliwood” — because I think it represents something really signficant in the posterchild of the Web2.0.
Sure enough, it got buried after a few days — although shout outs to: ziggyluvsu, robweber, and yodoasama, and everyone else at Digg for keeping it alive in some fashion.
I did end up sending messages to at least two A-listers who I have yet to hear back from.
I also am getting nothing back from Digg itself.
Nor, actually, the few “Alisons” who go to the United States Airforce Academy [who, incidentally, have hit this site a few times -- I know you're reading!], who’ve I’ve tried to contact over Facebook … to try and get her side of the story.
Nor, any real responses on DiggFans, who, as a community, I thought would know something about, or care about the issue.
Anyway, this “wall of silence” is fairly impenetrable … and it just goes to show how little pull a D-Lister has … even when there may be a legitimate issue worth checking out.
There’s a hierarchy, a pecking order, a clique system if you will, that exists within the blogosphere. Most of us don’t hang out with the cool “A-lister” crowd, yet — and we all have our reasons for aspiring to do so.
For the D-Lister crowd, its a bit of a hoe everyday — but I’m workin’ on it, and I’m lovin’ it.
I just wish I could get a civilized response every now and again when I ask a decent question.

11 Comments
Hey credibility has a downside too….
Oh? And what might that be?
Cheers and thanks for stopping by
t
I’d rather party with a bunch of unknown bloggers than an imaginary “A-List” anyways. You know what the “A” stands for, don’t you? :)
Well, I know what it *can* stand for, certainly. ;)
It would be interesting though … a “D-List” party. I wonder what *that* would be like.
Less photo-ops, more fun, I think. ;)
But there’d be a big guest list … which might be part of the fun.
I would have to say I would probably fall intot he D-List blogger category as well, but I’m passionate about everything I write about, so shouldn’t that be all that matters? I just started my blog, so I have a long way to go before making it to the b or c list or MAYBE even the A list!
Like you, I also write on web 2.0 & blogging- drewmeyersinsights.com
Hey Drew,
Thanks for dropping by.
Your blog looks like a great read — keep up the good work.
Re: “Should that be all that matters” — I think it has to do with why you (or me, or anyone) blogs at all. If its purely for the sake of getting stuff down on the electronic page and nothing else … then I’d whole heartedly agree with you.
If it has anything else to do with either (in large or small mounts), fame, fortune and/or large bags of cash then … well, it may not.
As I said in my post, being on the D-List (and I hope I would at least make the D-List) sucks rotten eggrolls for me because when I had something interesting to say, no one’s listening.
Even when I contact them directly.
Meh — well, more on that to come as it comes out … I haven’t exhausted all my means to get down to the bottom of *that* story yet.
Thanks again for stopping by!
t
I do feel your frustration that when I have a particularly insightful thought, no one is listening. However, people are listening- but maybe only a small number (right now). Eventually, if you (or I) continue to write great content day after day- the rest will take care of itself. At least that is my thinking. Building a blog takes time. How long have you been blogging?
I do not think people start blogging to make money in 99% of cases. I do it because I think I have something worth saying. A blog is one available avenue to express yourself. Keep up the good work.
If you check out the archives, probably about 6 months now — hard to believe it, but its true.
For the first 5 months or so, it was really only for myself, as a way to remind myself of things I was doing so I didn’t have to repeat myself in re-discovering things.
That’s why if you review the “archives” most of the original posts tending to be technical in nature … which is something I might get back into.
Once my blog got ranked, I thought about trying to turn it around into something more palatable for others, since every now and again someone not related to me stumbled upon it.
Sure enough, I got ’serious’ about it and obtained the domain name and here I am.
Bloggin’ for the sake of bloggin’. ;)
Cheers
t
PS For all of the other 1.5 people who might scan this, check out Drew’s Zillow.com — its some pretty good stuff. AJAX + real estate == web2.0 goodness. ;)
Nice Blog Tony I like the way it looks. I’m a typical guy I have to comment on the looks first before I really start looking at the heart of it.
Your comments on the blogosphere are right on. Right now there is definitely a fairly small A-list. Some (not all) seem to want to keep it that way too. I have the type of blog that really doesn’t appeal to other bloggers, computer geeks, or get rich quickers. It appeals to real people interested in a particular subject. So I don’t feel like I need to rely on the A-list bloggers to keep long term traffic coming. Mine is going to be searches, word of mouth, and a few well placed links. A popular story on Digg wouldn’t even help me much because most of them would never come back.
I’m glad I found this blog from Liz’s place. I will spend some time looking around.
Hey Roy (again),
Thanks for the kind words.
First off, I think “A-List” is a relative thing — there is an “A-List” I think for most niche topics … tech stuff, because of so much VC focus, is the kind that gets lots of attention (and write ups).
ASIDE: Your own website looks interesting — what’s it about? (give your free plug here!)
As for “THE” A-List I’m referring to, there, actually, was a fascinating discussion about the topic earlier in August that I may just summarize for the sake of posterity … but basically there was a lively back and forth amongst A-listers about how the blogosphere was divided. Some agreed that some of us D-Listers are regarded as paupers seeking shekels in the form of links from our A-List overlords if we look to increase our page rank and so on.
Others (A-Listers) felt that it was nonsense, and that the blogosphere was far more democratic than that.
My feeling is that the former is probably MORE true, and they certainly act it — if you ever try and send them an email, most of the times all you’ll get is a stony response.
Cheers
t
Ummmm…. i checked your status and for a D-List rant, you’re actually a B-Lister. So you’re not going to be invited to a party for D-Listers :P. And believe me, people read your stuff. It just so happens that most of us are lurkers.
2 Trackbacks
[...] Not to mention that she’s easily one of the nicest, classiest broads I have ever had the pleasure of meeting. Every week Successful-Blog.com hosts a regular blog “chat”, and yesterday was no exception. The discussion was lively and collegial, and for someone who had just shown up to the proverbial party, the community was great. I was treated like an equal, which is nice for a change. ;) [...]
[...] A Brief History of Digg Controversy August 25th, 2006 at 1:58 am by Tony After blogging about the “Aliwood” incident, which was received with deafening silence, I looked into whether or not this was the first time anyone had been interested in controversy over at Digg.com. [...]