<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UPDATE: Digg Deletes AliWood &#8212; Editorial &#8220;Execution&#8221; or Personal Preference?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/08/17/update-digg-deletes-aliwood-editorial-execution-or-personal-preference/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/08/17/update-digg-deletes-aliwood-editorial-execution-or-personal-preference/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Web 2.0, Social Media, Marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deep Jive Interests &#187; Digg&#8217;s Editors Show Their Invisible Hand (Again)</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/08/17/update-digg-deletes-aliwood-editorial-execution-or-personal-preference/comment-page-1/#comment-2779</link>
		<dc:creator>Deep Jive Interests &#187; Digg&#8217;s Editors Show Their Invisible Hand (Again)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/08/17/update-digg-deletes-aliwood-editorial-execution-or-personal-preference/#comment-2779</guid>
		<description>[...] Consider &#8220;Aliwood&#8221;, where a few months ago, the Diggnation got &#8216;tricked&#8217; into voting up a page for reasons other than its intrinsic newsworthiness.  A college student basically mentioned that she was getting graded on her ability to post articles and get them &#8220;dugg&#8221;; as a result, the first few articles she submitted, although stale, got hundreds, and in one case, over 1000 diggs not because they were fresh and interesting &#8212; but because of the story around her.  What may or may not have helped is that she was also not unattractive.  In a demographic composed almost entirely of males, this may have also pumped up the number of diggs. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Consider &#8220;Aliwood&#8221;, where a few months ago, the Diggnation got &#8216;tricked&#8217; into voting up a page for reasons other than its intrinsic newsworthiness.  A college student basically mentioned that she was getting graded on her ability to post articles and get them &#8220;dugg&#8221;; as a result, the first few articles she submitted, although stale, got hundreds, and in one case, over 1000 diggs not because they were fresh and interesting &#8212; but because of the story around her.  What may or may not have helped is that she was also not unattractive.  In a demographic composed almost entirely of males, this may have also pumped up the number of diggs. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deep Jive Interests &#187; What Kevin Rose Could Learn from Jason Calacanis (Or, A Look at Why Digg&#8217;s PR Shockingly Bad)</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/08/17/update-digg-deletes-aliwood-editorial-execution-or-personal-preference/comment-page-1/#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator>Deep Jive Interests &#187; What Kevin Rose Could Learn from Jason Calacanis (Or, A Look at Why Digg&#8217;s PR Shockingly Bad)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 15:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/08/17/update-digg-deletes-aliwood-editorial-execution-or-personal-preference/#comment-256</guid>
		<description>[...] Jay Adelson has started posting comments telling people, likewise, to lay off trying to target elite diggers &#8212; it wasn&#8217;t their fault. Digg will take care of the abuse. And &#8230; well, that&#8217;s about it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jay Adelson has started posting comments telling people, likewise, to lay off trying to target elite diggers &#8212; it wasn&#8217;t their fault. Digg will take care of the abuse. And &#8230; well, that&#8217;s about it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Brief History of Digg Controversy at diggaddict.com</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/08/17/update-digg-deletes-aliwood-editorial-execution-or-personal-preference/comment-page-1/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>A Brief History of Digg Controversy at diggaddict.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 20:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/08/17/update-digg-deletes-aliwood-editorial-execution-or-personal-preference/#comment-123</guid>
		<description>[...] Another post about controversy and Digg: After blogging about the “Aliwood” incident, which was received with deafening silence, I looked into whether or not this was the first time anyone had been interested in controversy over at Digg.com. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Another post about controversy and Digg: After blogging about the “Aliwood” incident, which was received with deafening silence, I looked into whether or not this was the first time anyone had been interested in controversy over at Digg.com. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deep Jive Interests &#187; A Brief History of Digg Controversy</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/08/17/update-digg-deletes-aliwood-editorial-execution-or-personal-preference/comment-page-1/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Deep Jive Interests &#187; A Brief History of Digg Controversy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 06:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/08/17/update-digg-deletes-aliwood-editorial-execution-or-personal-preference/#comment-85</guid>
		<description>[...] A Brief History of Digg Controversy August 25th, 2006 at 1:58 am by Tony After blogging about the &#8220;Aliwood&#8221; incident, which was received with deafening silence, I looked into whether or not this was the first time anyone had been interested in controversy over at Digg.com. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A Brief History of Digg Controversy August 25th, 2006 at 1:58 am by Tony After blogging about the &#8220;Aliwood&#8221; incident, which was received with deafening silence, I looked into whether or not this was the first time anyone had been interested in controversy over at Digg.com. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deep Jive Interests &#187; A Brief History of Dig Controversies</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/08/17/update-digg-deletes-aliwood-editorial-execution-or-personal-preference/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Deep Jive Interests &#187; A Brief History of Dig Controversies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 05:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/08/17/update-digg-deletes-aliwood-editorial-execution-or-personal-preference/#comment-84</guid>
		<description>[...] A Brief History of Dig Controversies August 25th, 2006 at 1:45 am by Tony After blogging about the &#8220;Aliwood&#8221; incident, which was received with deafening silence, I looked into whether or not this was the first time anyone had been interested in controversy over at Digg.com. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A Brief History of Dig Controversies August 25th, 2006 at 1:45 am by Tony After blogging about the &#8220;Aliwood&#8221; incident, which was received with deafening silence, I looked into whether or not this was the first time anyone had been interested in controversy over at Digg.com. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/08/17/update-digg-deletes-aliwood-editorial-execution-or-personal-preference/comment-page-1/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/08/17/update-digg-deletes-aliwood-editorial-execution-or-personal-preference/#comment-81</guid>
		<description>http://digg.com/tech_news/Digg_Should_Disclose_if_Moderating_Submissions

and another one bites the dust.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://digg.com/tech_news/Digg_Should_Disclose_if_Moderating_Submissions" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/digg.com');" rel="nofollow">http://digg.com/tech_news/Digg_Should_Disclose_if_Moderating_Submissions</a></p>
<p>and another one bites the dust.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/08/17/update-digg-deletes-aliwood-editorial-execution-or-personal-preference/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 20:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/08/17/update-digg-deletes-aliwood-editorial-execution-or-personal-preference/#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I&#039;ve heard about that as well.

Whether that&#039;s a function of their popularity in and of itself, or the fact they have so many &quot;friends&quot; driving up their posts irrespective of their worth is debatable ... but worth trying to investigate.

Thanks for stopping by!

t</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;ve heard about that as well.</p>
<p>Whether that&#8217;s a function of their popularity in and of itself, or the fact they have so many &#8220;friends&#8221; driving up their posts irrespective of their worth is debatable &#8230; but worth trying to investigate.</p>
<p>Thanks for stopping by!</p>
<p>t</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

